Hi - there's a little information on this at:
http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fsl/formats.html
Yes, we are gradually improving things to be more robust against
changes in the ordering, but for now we would still recommend sticking
with radiological.
Cheers.
On 1 Nov 2007, at 21:12, Susan Alice McLaughlin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm checking to make sure that it is still important to use
> radiologically ordered images in FSL 4.0 as it was in FSL 3.3?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Susan McLaughlin
> Doctoral Student
> Dept. of Speech and Hearing Sciences
> University of Washington
> 1417 NE 42nd St.
> Seattle, WA 98105
>
> Phone: 206-850-8638
> Fax: 206-543-1093
> Email: [log in to unmask]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|