AFAIK there was a WN package between those to be updated. Is there also
a fix for tarball relocatable distros?
-Piotr
Markus Schulz napisa?(a):
> Hi,
> I guess that I now understand the "problem".
>
> The LCG-RB has a dependency with the LFC client/interface. Since in
> the current build system the dpm and lfc clients and servers are both
> build
> in one go a bugs that effect any part of the the LFC or DPM (client or
> servers) formally affect the LCG-RB.
>
> With the move to ETICS this should be split and we will see
> (hopefully) less of these weak couplings.
>
>
> markus
>
>
>
>
>
> On Oct 18, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Jeff Templon wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> i wonder if something went wrong, because this link:
>>
>> http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R3.0/deployment/lcg-RB/3.0.3-2/lcg-RB-3.0.3-2-update.html
>>
>>
>> says it is about the RB release notes but only talks about DPM. Maybe
>> the date of 17 October is wrong too?
>>
>> JT
>>
>>
>> Francisco Jose Bernabe Pellicer wrote:
>>> There are new updates for gL3.0 with HIGH priority.
>>> http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R3.0/updates.asp
>>> No announcement about it?
>>> Cheers,
>>> Francisco.
--
Piotr Siwczak <[log in to unmask]>
System Administrator
Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center
Supercomputing Department
(www.eu-egee.org <[log in to unmask]>)
--
|