 |
 |
AFAIK there was a WN package between those to be updated. Is there also a fix for tarball relocatable distros? -Piotr Markus Schulz napisa?(a): > Hi, > I guess that I now understand the "problem". > > The LCG-RB has a dependency with the LFC client/interface. Since in > the current build system the dpm and lfc clients and servers are both > build > in one go a bugs that effect any part of the the LFC or DPM (client or > servers) formally affect the LCG-RB. > > With the move to ETICS this should be split and we will see > (hopefully) less of these weak couplings. > > > markus > > > > > > On Oct 18, 2006, at 1:12 PM, Jeff Templon wrote: > >> Hi >> >> i wonder if something went wrong, because this link: >> >> http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R3.0/deployment/lcg-RB/3.0.3-2/lcg-RB-3.0.3-2-update.html >> >> >> says it is about the RB release notes but only talks about DPM. Maybe >> the date of 17 October is wrong too? >> >> JT >> >> >> Francisco Jose Bernabe Pellicer wrote: >>> There are new updates for gL3.0 with HIGH priority. >>> http://glite.web.cern.ch/glite/packages/R3.0/updates.asp >>> No announcement about it? >>> Cheers, >>> Francisco. -- Piotr Siwczak <[log in to unmask]> System Administrator Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center Supercomputing Department (www.eu-egee.org <[log in to unmask]>) --