JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN  2004

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN 2004

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Cockroft & Gault versus MDRD

From:

Chris Florkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Chris Florkowski <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:47:48 +1200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (88 lines)

I have pasted in (vide infra) our draft proposal for adopting a GFR prediction, based on Cockroft & Gault.  The Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) evidence-based clinical practice guidelines state that "..GFR should be estimated from prediction equations..."and that "...using timed urine colections does not improve the estimate of GFR....".  Other guidelines reviews (Clin Biochem Rev; vol 24, Aug 2003, 95-7) state that "the MDRD formula has not yet been subject to sufficient scrutiny to recommend its routine use."

CHRISTCHURCH HOSPITAL (NZ)  PROPOSAL:
Proposal to offer "Calculated Glomerular Filtration Rate" using measured plasma creatinine and the Cockroft and Gault formula.

Creatinine clearance is can be estimated from the serum creatinine level,  using the Cockroft and Gault formula (Nephron 1976 16:31-41).  A modified version of this formula (see below) uses a nominal figure for the patient's ideal body weight based on their height, which has been shown to correlate more closely with measured 24 hr creatinine clearance (Intensive Care Med 1993 19:39-43).   The same formula is currently in use at Christchurch Hospital ("Management Guidelines for Common Medical Conditions") for guidance of drug dosing.  The proposal is to offer a calculation through Canterbury Health Laboratories. 


CrCl = (140-age) x IBW x F / (Serum Cr x 48816)

· F = 1.0 for men or 0.85 for women.

· Men : IBW = 50 kg + 0.9 kg for every cm over 150 cm height
· Women: IBW = 45 kg + 0.9 kg for every cm over 150 cm height

In practice, taking the patient's self reported height to the nearest centimetre will be accurate enough for clinical purposes and it is not necessary to get the patient up to get an exact measurement during the current admission.  Alternatively, if it is not possible to use height, then actual body weight can be used as an alternative.


Practical issues for requesting "calculated GFR".

Clinicians should write "calculated GFR" in the "other tests" section of the Canterbury Health Laboratories request form.

Either height (metres and centimetres) or weight (kg) should be given.  Self reported height to the nearest centimetre is considered to be sufficiently accurate.

If both height and weight are given, then precedence will be given to height and GFR will be calculated based on ideal body weight.

If weight alone is given, then GFR will be calculated according to actual body weight.

Comments to be issued with reports:

For all reports:

Report : "calculated GFR based on ideal body weight, derived from height" OR
Report: "calculated GFR based on actual body weight"


For all reports based on ideal body weight:

"Under steady state conditions, calculated GFR is accurate enough to guide drug dosing, although may overestimate GFR in subjects with low Body Mass Index and underestimate GFR in the obese.  Caution should also be exercised in interpretation in amputees and other complex cases."

For all reports based on actual body weight:

"Under steady state conditions, calculated GFR is accurate enough to guide drug dosing, although caution should be exercised in interpretation in extremes of body weight, amputees and other complex cases."

If no weight or height given:

"Height or weight not given to enable calculation of GFR".

If plasma creatinine < 0.06 mmol:

"Serum creatinine was too low for accurate estimation of GFR by the Cockroft-Gault method."

For Children (age <16 years) - no calculation will be done

"The Cockroft-Gault equation has not been fully validated in younger subjects".

Proposal under review, with strong impetus from nephrologists to support a move away from 24h urine collections.  We expect this to be adopted.

Chris Florkowski
Christchurch, NZ




**********************************************************************
This email and attachments have been scanned for content and viruses

and is believed to be clean
This email or attachments may contain confidential or legally

privileged information intended for the sole use of the addressee(s).

Any use, redistribution, disclosure, or reproduction of this message,

except as intended, is prohibited. If you received this email in error,

please notify the sender and remove all copies of the message,

including any attachments. Any views or opinions expressed in this

email (unless otherwise stated) may not represent those of Canterbury

District Health Board
**********************************************************************

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.

ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager