At 03:05 PM 2/13/2002 -0500, Wagner,Harry wrote:
> > ok, than i offer http://www.w3.org/2001/10/navigate/ as a
> > prototype for
> > helping shape such discussions.
>
>Thanks. I look at this all the time. What do you think influenced the UI
>of prototype 2 and 3? :)
excellent :) err... although i'll stress that
http://www.w3.org/2001/10/navigate/ is more an exercise in functional
requirements than UI design :)
> > >We have settled on the technology to use (IMO) but much of
> > the functionality
> > >is still open for discussion. Your contributions would be greatly
> > >appreciated.
> >
> > err... who is 'we'? This group? And with respect to
> > technology, do you mean
> > something like "RDF as a means of recording the semantics,
> > and Jena as a
> > toolkit for supporting the query, db interface and supporting
> > API"? yes?
>
>Hopefully my last email (which crossed yours) answered this, but if you have
yep, it did... by 'we' you meant 'you', and by technology you mean (what i
thought) "RDF as a means of recording the semantics, and Jena as a toolkit
for supporting the query, db interface and supporting API"
>suggestions regarding technology choices I am anxious to hear them.
No additional suggestions; it seems for what the DCMI requires, you've made
a fine choice :) I find myself increasingly using Jena [1] Java/Servlet
combinations for prototyping larger more stable Semantic Web/RDF services
and Python (Redfoot, and now Aaron's Plexdev [2]) when offline hacking on
laptop in plane :) (python *far* less heavy than Java/Servlet).
--
eric miller http://www.w3.org/people/em/
semantic web activity lead mailto:[log in to unmask]
w3c world wide web consortium tel:1.614.763.1100
[1] http://sourceforge.net/projects/jena/
[2] http://plexdev.org/
|