On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab wrote:
>
> > http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1 and
> > http://purl.org/dc/qualifiers/
> > http://purl.org/dc/types/
> >
> Can we regard this issue as settled? I feel that it is. The documenation
> on elements, element sets, qualifiers etc will be maintained according to
> the guidelines that has previously been settled in the dcmi usage
> committe.
Please can you clarify for me... are you suggesting we use one namespace
for all and any qualifiers that implementors use to qualify DC
elements?
And that we distinguish recommended from non-recommended by use of
annotations or press releases??
Rachel
>
> Name space URIs should be changed only when needed because of major
> revisions of semantics has been made (e.g., when elements are removed
> rather than deprecated).
>
> Schema languages like schematron can help implementors, giving warnings
> when deprecated elements are used.
>
> Having settled the principles, Tod will almost certainly happily implement
> the above naming system.
>
>
> Sigge
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rachel Heery
UKOLN (UK Office for Library and Information Networking)
University of Bath tel: +44 (0)1225 826724
Bath, BA2 7AY, UK fax: +44 (0)1225 826838
http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/
|