Thank you for all your replies which ended up totalling over 50. I sent a
representative (if slightly arbitrary sample) to the MJ. So please, no
more!
It was interesting that the mailbase could provoke such immediate and
articulate reponse. A reminder that many of the project descriptions could
go into GEM News or, if more research based, into the Journal. For the
News contact [log in to unmask], or for the Journal
[log in to unmask]
At yesterday's GEM Committee meeting we discussed the future of GEM
publications, and I have volunteered to do msime research and take views
from GEM members on how to get the best out of the existing publications
and the GEM webiste. I will do a formal survey, but would welcome any
initial thoughts from out there over the next couple of weeks.
Stephen Allen
GEM Chair
|