In a message dated 7/5/01 12:00:44 PM, qwe rty <[log in to unmask]>
writes:
>- Does the inherently textual nature of, say, these emails make them
>potentially fictional and therefore not fulfilling the assumed nature of
>the
>email group?
Are these positions then mutually exclusive, "O Welles"?
clever, that.
An actor drinking water or performing pornography--both instances of the
collapse of actor/act-ed into one body, and of course these are simplistic
situations--at least the water is. But the problem isn't located in any case
in audience "confusion" but in the nature of its interest.
Patricia A. Suchy
|