|
|
|
Size
|
Re: Looking fot Simon Hartog filmography
|
nicole brenez |
Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:38:54 +0100 |
64 lines |
Looking fot Simon Hartog filmography
|
Juan Antonio Rivera Vila |
Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:31:53 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: classic movie scripts online
|
Juan Antonio Rivera Vila |
Sat, 31 Dec 2005 11:19:57 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Synoptique Sound Edition - 01-15-06
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sat, 31 Dec 2005 01:09:26 -0500 |
86 lines |
CFP: Synoptique Sound Edition - 01-15-06
|
Randolph Jordan |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 20:24:39 -0500 |
47 lines |
Re: Catherine Breillat's Sex is Comedy
|
Paul Iannone |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:36:19 -0800 |
57 lines |
Digesting the salon
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:20:08 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing ofanti-intellectuals
|
christiaan cruz |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 14:00:33 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: Pay it Forward
|
Tim Vermeulen |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 10:35:19 +0100 |
79 lines |
Catherine Breillat's Sex is Comedy
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 23:17:43 -0500 |
30 lines |
9.50 Cavell's Reply to Grant
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 00:22:48 +0000 |
122 lines |
Re: Pay it Forward
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:29:47 -0800 |
105 lines |
Re: Mise en abyme & social systems theory
|
Ross Macleay |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:30:54 +1100 |
25 lines |
Re: Acting
|
Ross Macleay |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:24:46 +1100 |
69 lines |
Twas mise en abime killed the beast
|
Ross Macleay |
Fri, 30 Dec 2005 09:18:36 +1100 |
25 lines |
Mise en abyme & social systems theory
|
Henry Taylor |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 21:12:13 +0100 |
31 lines |
9.49 Grant on Cavell
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 18:11:39 +0000 |
189 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing ofanti-intellectuals
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:22:38 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 29 Dec 2005 - Special issue (#2005-430)
|
Robert Sinnerbrink |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 20:28:54 +1100 |
36 lines |
take it elsewhere
|
Wesley Harris |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 03:25:22 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Mise en abyme
|
Melis Behlil |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:00:29 +0200 |
102 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing ofanti-intellectuals
|
bill harris |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:39:34 -0500 |
431 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing ofanti-intellectuals
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:55:22 -0800 |
252 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing ofanti-intellectuals
|
Steve Devos |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 01:14:16 -0000 |
205 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing ofanti-intellectuals
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:41:16 -0800 |
186 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing of Mikal Howard
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:36:32 -0800 |
62 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing of Mikal Howard
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:35:12 -0800 |
119 lines |
Re: Mise en abyme
|
Adrian Martin |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:34:09 +1100 |
31 lines |
Miser-en-abime
|
Ross Macleay |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:21:46 +1100 |
34 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing of Mikal Howard
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:53:51 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing of Mikal Howard
|
dammy Babs |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 13:01:23 -0800 |
73 lines |
Re: The Relentless Posturing of Mikal Howard
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 15:47:59 -0500 |
38 lines |
The Relentless Posturing of Mikal Howard
|
Adrian Martin |
Thu, 29 Dec 2005 07:44:57 +1100 |
30 lines |
introductions
|
gary gach |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:22:45 -0800 |
27 lines |
Re: Acting
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:31:44 -0800 |
67 lines |
Re: Query: Mise-en-abime
|
Anna Rogers |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 16:09:05 +0000 |
65 lines |
Acting
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:29:42 EST |
63 lines |
Re: Query: Mise-en-abime
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 08:26:51 -0500 |
60 lines |
Query: Mise-en-abime
|
Henry Taylor |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 14:00:11 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Haukur Már Helgason |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 04:55:25 +0000 |
43 lines |
Acting nee US Independent Cinema
|
Ross Macleay |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 11:49:54 +1100 |
184 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 25 Dec 2005 to 27 Dec 2005 - Special issue (#2005-425)
|
Robert Sinnerbrink |
Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:42:55 +1100 |
57 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 27 Dec 2005 (#2005-426)
|
Paul Schrader |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:37:59 -0600 |
23 lines |
Re: Hello
|
Funda Civelekoglu |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:52:31 +0000 |
60 lines |
Re: Filmic Reality
|
Alexa Pecore |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:13:10 EST |
114 lines |
Re: Filmic Reality
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 20:06:44 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Filmic Reality
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:54:43 -0500 |
76 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Sarah Nichols |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 11:43:55 -0800 |
51 lines |
Filmic Reality
|
Houston Wood |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:31:14 -1000 |
35 lines |
Re: film reality
|
Alan Fair |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:24:38 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: film reality
|
Alan Fair |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:14:42 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 25 Dec 2005 to 27 Dec 2005 - Special issue (#2005-425)
|
Daniel Barnett |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:28:50 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Hello
|
Alexa Pecore |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:19:10 EST |
46 lines |
Re: Hello
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 10:14:56 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: Hello
|
WmmvrrvrrmmrrvrrvmmW |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 15:08:53 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:57:11 +0000 |
38 lines |
Hello
|
Paul Schrader |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 08:43:26 -0600 |
22 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Alexa Pecore |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:25:58 EST |
72 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 12:00:52 +0000 |
69 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Paul Ryersbach |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 01:21:01 -0500 |
101 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Paul Ryersbach |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:48:40 -0500 |
125 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Alexa Pecore |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:39:12 EST |
52 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:25:01 -0500 |
79 lines |
Re: great dialogue
|
Patricia Molloy |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:19:28 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 24 Dec 2005 to 25 Dec 2005 (#2005-424)
|
Shaw, Dan |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 19:05:55 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
christiaan cruz |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:23:37 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
John M. |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:59:02 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Henry Taylor |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 23:42:50 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 24 Dec 2005 to 25 Dec 2005 (#2005-424)
|
Robert Sinnerbrink |
Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:36:27 +1100 |
43 lines |
Re: Film and Reality
|
Shaw, Dan |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 17:25:29 -0500 |
43 lines |
Film and Reality
|
Houston Wood |
Mon, 26 Dec 2005 11:16:56 -1000 |
34 lines |
Re: classic movie scripts online
|
John M. |
Sun, 25 Dec 2005 09:44:56 -0500 |
22 lines |
classic movie scripts online
|
Romeo Grünfelder |
Sun, 25 Dec 2005 15:33:27 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: great dialogue
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sun, 25 Dec 2005 08:57:37 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: great dialogue
|
Sarah Nichols |
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:11:17 -0800 |
67 lines |
Looking for classics shooting scripts
|
Juan Antonio Rivera Vila |
Sat, 24 Dec 2005 08:46:04 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: great dialogue
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 19:55:19 -0800 |
59 lines |
Re: great dialogue
|
Brian Charles Dauth |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 20:09:42 -0500 |
25 lines |
great dialogue
|
quahogula |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 15:59:58 -0800 |
20 lines |
Re: Dolly/zoom and "Frankenheimer effect"
|
Marty Norden |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 13:51:04 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Shaw, Dan |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 08:25:57 -0500 |
245 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 21 Dec 2005 to 22 Dec 2005 (#2005-420)
|
Yoram Allon |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 11:40:05 +0000 |
131 lines |
Dolly/zoom and "Frankenheimer effect"
|
Henry Taylor |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 10:46:22 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Saul Steier |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 01:39:37 -0800 |
70 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
arup rahee |
Fri, 23 Dec 2005 03:55:00 +0000 |
203 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:03:08 -0500 |
191 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 16:00:20 -0500 |
147 lines |
How many academics does it take to figure out how to reply to e-mail (was: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror)
|
<> |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 15:50:26 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Eskandar Sadeghi |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:48:22 -0800 |
123 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Eskandar Sadeghi |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:27:20 -0800 |
115 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:02:37 -0800 |
112 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Seo, Bo Myung |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:47:37 -0600 |
81 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
indra karan |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:57:15 -0800 |
113 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
A Rozen |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 10:26:22 -0800 |
79 lines |
|
John fulbright |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:52:46 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Jason Ulane |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 11:40:41 -0600 |
88 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
WILHELM S. WURZER, Professor of Philosophy & |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 12:03:59 -0500 |
67 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Doug Kellner |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:46:04 -0800 |
76 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 09:14:04 -0500 |
137 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:59:29 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Robert Cargni Mitchell |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:54:43 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror[Scanned]
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 13:48:49 -0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
BklynMagus |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:43:44 -0500 |
58 lines |
Complimentary copy of special Film and Philosoophy edition on Horror
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 08:11:57 -0500 |
47 lines |
Presses receptive to philosophy and film books
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 07:49:14 -0500 |
51 lines |
Senior Lecturer/Reader in Film Studies - University of St Andrews
|
D. Martin-Jones |
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:42:45 +0000 |
188 lines |
Re: US Independent Cinema
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 03:29:10 -0800 |
557 lines |
US Independent Cinema
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:18:08 EST |
56 lines |
Call for Papers: Rediscovering Polish Cinema
|
Konrad Klejsa |
Wed, 21 Dec 2005 04:00:32 +0100 |
830 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema needs backer, waits.
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:33:13 -0800 |
426 lines |
US Independent Cinema
|
Richard Armstrong |
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 15:37:37 EST |
100 lines |
Re: dolly/zoom by Hitchcock and Spielberg
|
Andrew Court |
Tue, 20 Dec 2005 11:04:49 +1100 |
36 lines |
US Independent cinema
|
Geoff King |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:04:37 -0000 |
57 lines |
Re: zoom dolly dolly
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 11:42:44 -0800 |
68 lines |
9.48 Wartenberg on Carroll
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 19:21:52 +0000 |
389 lines |
zoom dolly dolly
|
Daniel Barnett |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 13:36:17 EST |
62 lines |
Screen Studies/Cinema at the Periphery Conferences
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:08:34 +0000 |
138 lines |
dolly/zoom by Hitchcock and Spielberg
|
geska |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 16:52:10 +0100 |
27 lines |
Film Scene, Hong Kong, April 21-22, 2006
|
Gina Marchetti |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 04:45:43 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: Elementary: cinema to channel dirt
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 10:12:49 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Elementary: cinema to channel dirt
|
Sarah Barmak |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 02:41:30 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: Elementary: cinema to channel dirt
|
Haukur Már Helgason |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 05:05:55 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Elementary: cinema to channel dirt
|
Tala |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:50:35 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Elementary: cinema to channel dirt
|
Haukur Már Helgason |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:44:13 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: Elementary: cinema to channel dirt
|
Tala |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:32:31 -0500 |
57 lines |
Elementary: cinema to channel dirt
|
Haukur Már Helgason |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 03:23:43 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Belmondo-Bogie
|
Saul Steier |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 19:10:12 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: US Independent Cinema
|
Jim Flannery |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:51:03 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: US Independent Cinema
|
Richard Cohen |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:23:07 -0800 |
24 lines |
Re: US Independent Cinema
|
<> |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 17:11:59 EST |
56 lines |
Belmondo-Bogie
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 16:19:58 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Dec 2005 to 18 Dec 2005 (#2005-415)[Scanned]
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 21:17:26 -0000 |
79 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Dec 2005 to 18 Dec 2005 (#2005-415)
|
Ramona Fotiade |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 20:51:25 +0000 |
46 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 16 Dec 2005 to 17 Dec 2005 (#2005-414)
|
Ramona Fotiade |
Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:47:01 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Kent Farmer |
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 22:18:04 +0000 |
34 lines |
|
Helen Stritzler |
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 17:14:35 -0500 |
20 lines |
|
Lee Parpart |
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 16:19:19 -0500 |
41 lines |
|
Matthew Dougherty |
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 12:44:18 -0800 |
23 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Tala |
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 09:12:18 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 15:02:39 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Tala |
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:21:58 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 17 Dec 2005 03:15:35 -0800 |
89 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 21:04:35 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Sean Delgado |
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:27:14 +0000 |
24 lines |
US Independent Cinema
|
Richard Armstrong |
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 13:17:23 EST |
81 lines |
Re: US Independent Cinema
|
Geoff King |
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:14:09 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Ross Macleay |
Fri, 16 Dec 2005 16:24:08 +1100 |
29 lines |
Re: US Independent cinema
|
Nathan Andersen |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 13:17:39 -0500 |
38 lines |
CFP: The Philosophy of Film
|
John Adams |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 18:05:00 +0000 |
67 lines |
Re: US Independent Cinema
|
Sean Delgado |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:00:09 +0000 |
31 lines |
US Independent Cinema
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:10:24 EST |
65 lines |
Review of Singer's "3 Philosophical Filmmakers"
|
Sarah Nichols |
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:41:17 -0800 |
65 lines |
Death of Quotes
|
Ross Macleay |
Wed, 14 Dec 2005 10:32:45 +1100 |
65 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 Dec 2005 to 12 Dec 2005 (#2005-409)
|
lucy.fraser |
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 22:49:58 -0000 |
35 lines |
Re: Looking for Godard Quote
|
Paul Grant |
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 16:37:36 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Looking for Godard Quote
|
Robert hughes |
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 18:42:50 +0000 |
28 lines |
9.47 Overstreet on Singer
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:34:57 +0000 |
253 lines |
Re: Looking for Godard Quote
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:25:44 +0000 |
118 lines |
Looking for Godard Quote
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 13:05:36 EST |
55 lines |
Re: Looking for Godard Quote
|
Farris |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:25:30 -0600 |
60 lines |
Looking for Godard Quote
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:20:17 -0000 |
65 lines |
Re: Looking for Godard Quote
|
Philippe Mather |
Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:54:28 -0600 |
27 lines |
9.46 Court on Persson
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 9 Dec 2005 14:08:03 +0000 |
265 lines |
Fwd: THE ISTER
|
Robert Koehler |
Thu, 8 Dec 2005 13:11:25 -0800 |
124 lines |
Analytical Film Philosophy
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 7 Dec 2005 20:45:44 +0000 |
50 lines |
CFP: Emerging Spaces, Transforming Scapes
|
Jason Rovito |
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 15:23:26 -0500 |
191 lines |
King Kong of mice & men
|
Stephan Pickering |
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:07:11 EST |
221 lines |
Re: King Kong and Of Mice and Men
|
Steve Devos |
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:06:04 -0000 |
72 lines |
FW: Call For Papers
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:14:25 -0000 |
264 lines |
CFP: Film Remakes
|
John Marmysz |
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:47:48 -0500 |
81 lines |
King Kong and Of Mice and Men
|
Paul Ryersbach |
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:25:06 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: Writing Group Feedback PT2
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:36:35 -0000 |
59 lines |
Re: Writing Group Feedback PT2
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 15:27:48 -0000 |
39 lines |
Re: CFP Reminder- Rethinking the Past: Experimental Histories in the Arts
|
Tara Forrest |
Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:25:59 +1100 |
107 lines |
BEFORE HOLLYWOOD, From Shadow Play to the Silver Screen
|
Visual-Media |
Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:55:05 +0100 |
131 lines |
SFC Conference 2006 (Call)
|
Phil Powrie |
Sun, 4 Dec 2005 16:49:48 -0000 |
88 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 2 Dec 2005 to 3 Dec 2005 (#2005-402)
|
Steve Andriano-Moore |
Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:29:28 -0800 |
37 lines |
New on-line film magazine announcement
|
Adrian Martin |
Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:28:08 +1100 |
110 lines |
Re: Writing Group Feedback
|
Charles Brownson |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:41:00 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Writing Group Feedback - Appeal to fellow Film Studies researchers
|
Julia Jones |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:40:42 +0000 |
53 lines |
Re: Writing Group Feedback
|
Fabrice Lyczba |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 20:01:32 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Film Writing Group Feedback
|
Farris |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:47:24 -0600 |
52 lines |
Film Writing Group Feedback
|
Richard Armstrong |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 13:15:19 EST |
53 lines |
Writing Group Feedback
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 11:45:21 +0000 |
41 lines |
Re: He loves me,he loves me not
|
venkity |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 15:27:13 +0530 |
129 lines |
He loves me,he loves me not
|
atil eylem atakav |
Fri, 2 Dec 2005 00:05:48 +0000 |
46 lines |
David Lynch
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:15:48 +0000 |
34 lines |
Grad. Conference CFP (abstract deadline Dec. 15): Cinema Studies' Historical Turn
|
Joshua Yumibe |
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:43:25 -0600 |
117 lines |
Re: Film Writing Group
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 10:34:20 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Film Writing Group
|
Fabrice Lyczba |
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:51:24 +0100 |
23 lines |
Spectator 26.2 Reminder
|
Dan Leopard |
Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:51:59 -0800 |
177 lines |
Robert Lepage CFP
|
Bill Marshall |
Tue, 29 Nov 2005 04:43:02 EST |
107 lines |
Film Writing Group
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 13:38:11 EST |
67 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
Charles Brownson |
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:22:50 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Film Writing Group
|
Charles Brownson |
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 18:10:52 +0000 |
18 lines |
CALL FOR PAPERS: JAM 2006, Manifestations of Media Technology
|
JAM 2006 |
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 16:29:14 +0000 |
121 lines |
Re: Film Writing Group
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Mon, 28 Nov 2005 11:00:32 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:44:21 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:25:08 -0500 |
134 lines |
9.45 Nochimson on NYFF 2005 (Part 2)
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:07:25 +0000 |
497 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Sun, 27 Nov 2005 09:40:17 -0600 |
41 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
piers smith |
Sun, 27 Nov 2005 05:30:48 +0000 |
82 lines |
Re: Paparazzi (1964)
|
jmatturr |
Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:24:55 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Elephant and Tarr
|
Ross Macleay |
Sun, 27 Nov 2005 10:40:15 +1100 |
21 lines |
Re: Interval (2) call for film/video papers
|
Steven Eastwood |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:07:17 -0500 |
166 lines |
Paparazzi (1964)
|
Isabelle McNeill |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:46:12 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:46:29 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
julia kristanciuk |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 09:12:54 -0800 |
87 lines |
Re: Elephant and Tarr
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:36:14 +0100 |
46 lines |
re U looking for producers ?
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 10:57:09 +0100 |
160 lines |
Re: Elephant and Tarr
|
Randolph Jordan |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 22:28:40 -0500 |
49 lines |
Film Writing Group
|
Ross Macleay |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:29:10 +1100 |
23 lines |
Re: Elephant and Tarr
|
Ross Macleay |
Sat, 26 Nov 2005 12:23:39 +1100 |
110 lines |
story/plot
|
Warren Buckland |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:14:45 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:46:43 -0600 |
42 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
Magnus Koch |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:37:33 +0000 |
62 lines |
Re: Elephant and Tarr
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:26:09 +0100 |
140 lines |
Re: story / plot
|
Benjamin Noys |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:47:54 +0000 |
43 lines |
story / plot
|
Carlo C. Adorno |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:36:49 +0000 |
16 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Rob Luzecky |
Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:23:52 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:40:55 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 20:33:15 +0000 |
175 lines |
Film Writing Group
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:20:15 EST |
80 lines |
Re: Film Writing Group
|
nilotpal ghosh |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:23:25 +0100 |
60 lines |
Film Writing Group
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:19:04 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
eduardomauro |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 04:14:43 -0200 |
30 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Rob Luzecky |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 05:48:37 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
eduardomauro |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 01:39:31 -0200 |
51 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
christiaan cruz |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 02:13:52 +0000 |
32 lines |
Elephant and Tarr
|
Ross Macleay |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 12:37:33 +1100 |
84 lines |
Elephant and Tarr
|
Ross Macleay |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:01:11 +1100 |
80 lines |
Disturbing and Elephant
|
Ross Macleay |
Thu, 24 Nov 2005 10:53:07 +1100 |
67 lines |
Emigree directors
|
John Maguire |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 23:15:54 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:57:02 -0500 |
63 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:32:20 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 20:53:53 +0000 |
149 lines |
Hugo Haas
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 18:05:07 +0100 |
21 lines |
Film-Philosophy Netiquette
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:39:49 +0000 |
57 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:35:40 -0500 |
90 lines |
Re: Disturbing was Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible/wolf creek
|
Craig N. Simpson |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:37:12 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Steve Devos |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:19:37 -0000 |
77 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
eduardomauro |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 05:23:32 -0200 |
108 lines |
John Gwynn/Boston/FNS/Concentra is not in the office
|
John Gwynn |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:11:07 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:28:32 -0500 |
85 lines |
Disturbing was Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Ross Macleay |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 16:26:44 +1100 |
169 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:33:33 +0000 |
168 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 21:00:44 -0500 |
63 lines |
Cognitive Studies 2006 Conference
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 22:54:24 +0000 |
47 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:31:09 +0100 |
145 lines |
Re: Cathay Pacific Airlines
|
Peter Hughes |
Wed, 23 Nov 2005 07:55:21 +1100 |
47 lines |
Cathay Pacific Airlines
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:53:50 -0500 |
49 lines |
Re: Death of (French) Cinema
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:10:06 -0500 |
92 lines |
Robert Lepage CFP
|
Bill Marshall |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:09:18 EST |
190 lines |
Re: BRAINSTORM and Strange Days
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 06:35:08 -0800 |
51 lines |
Death of (French) Cinema
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:15:33 -0000 |
75 lines |
Re: Rouch Advice
|
Marina Vishmidt |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 14:08:30 -0000 |
30 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:22:09 -0500 |
96 lines |
Re: Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:23:53 +0100 |
57 lines |
THEORETISCHE TROPEN // Moritz Baßler
|
Christian Katti |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:15:09 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: Emigrée Directors
|
knebel |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 22:04:08 +0200 |
119 lines |
Re: Emigrée Directors
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 19:11:53 +0000 |
106 lines |
Re: Emigrée Directors
|
Savas Arslan |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:41:13 +0200 |
40 lines |
Re: Emigrיe Directors
|
Knebel Emil |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 20:16:56 +0200 |
58 lines |
Re: FLCL is WBSB
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 09:54:18 -0800 |
80 lines |
Hitchcock/Orr
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 17:31:27 +0000 |
63 lines |
Czechoslovakian Emigrée Directors
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 18:30:22 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Emigrée Directors
|
jmatturr |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:00:15 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Emigrée Directors
|
Kiarash Anvari |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 08:43:18 -0800 |
79 lines |
Re: Emigrée Directors
|
arturasbumsteinas |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 15:23:13 -0000 |
43 lines |
Emigrée Directors
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 16:02:01 +0100 |
23 lines |
Lilja 4 Ever & Irreversible
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 14:54:20 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: shopping mall in films
|
Craig N. Simpson |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 12:41:31 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: production context
|
eduardomauro |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 02:38:25 -0200 |
37 lines |
Re: suckered
|
Enid Mabbott |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 01:14:11 -0000 |
19 lines |
Re: production context
|
Andrew Benjamin |
Mon, 21 Nov 2005 07:28:51 +1100 |
137 lines |
Re: production context
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:46:30 -0800 |
76 lines |
Two conference calls: PEC/ASMCF
|
Phil Powrie |
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:58:08 -0000 |
246 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Nov 2005 to 18 Nov 2005 - Special issue (#2005-384)
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:21:06 -0200 |
33 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 20:56:42 -0800 |
227 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Nov 2005 to 18 Nov 2005 - Special issue (#2005-384)
|
Tala |
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 08:38:38 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:54:34 -0800 |
107 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:20:10 -0800 |
65 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Nov 2005 to 18 Nov 2005 - Special issue (#2005-384)
|
Robert Koehler |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:13:08 -0800 |
56 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
Dr Jason Jacobs |
Sat, 19 Nov 2005 05:07:38 +1000 |
146 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Nov 2005 to 18 Nov 2005 - Special issue (#2005-384)
|
Ricardo Greene F. |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:13:12 -0300 |
33 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Nov 2005 to 18 Nov 2005 - Special issue (#2005-384)
|
Nigel Morris |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 13:46:09 -0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
Ben Gook |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 23:36:34 +1100 |
104 lines |
Re: Innovation in film
|
nicole brenez |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 12:06:46 +0100 |
45 lines |
Innovation in film
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:25:56 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
Ben Gook |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 21:12:38 +1100 |
116 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:01:41 +0000 |
70 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
Dr Jason Jacobs |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 18:41:33 +1000 |
63 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
Paul Melia |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:23:40 +0000 |
32 lines |
The Ister (Heidegger-Hoelderlin film) now on DVD
|
Chris Clarke |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 08:04:15 +0000 |
257 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
Dr Jason Jacobs |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 17:35:27 +1000 |
50 lines |
Re: Casual sex?
|
Sarah Barmak |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 02:30:59 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Films as Philosophy "show me your kung-fu"
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 04:46:02 -0200 |
25 lines |
Re: shopping mall in films
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 04:26:46 -0200 |
33 lines |
Casual sex?
|
Carlo C. Adorno |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:11:40 +0000 |
28 lines |
Films as Philosophy
|
Carlo C. Adorno |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 06:00:24 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: shopping mall in films
|
Ben Gook |
Fri, 18 Nov 2005 10:58:33 +1100 |
32 lines |
Re: shopping mall in films
|
christiaan cruz |
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 21:24:15 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: shopping mall in films
|
Patricia Molloy |
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 14:46:08 -0500 |
32 lines |
shopping mall in films
|
Ricardo Greene F. |
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 16:21:04 -0300 |
29 lines |
Re: Films as Philosophy
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 04:44:47 -0800 |
76 lines |
call for papers: Synthetic Sensations (06/30/06)
|
Niran Abbas |
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:05:56 +0000 |
209 lines |
THIS FILM IS DANGEROUS - A CELEBRATION OF NITRATE FILM
|
Visual-Media |
Thu, 17 Nov 2005 08:05:07 +0100 |
92 lines |
Re: 1960s suburban films
|
Sean Delgado |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 23:38:16 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: 1960s suburban films
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 16:57:20 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: 1960s suburban films
|
Jason Rovito |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:50:52 -0500 |
96 lines |
1960s suburban films
|
jmatturr |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:46:42 -0500 |
25 lines |
Children smoking in films
|
Maria H. Spector |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 20:26:55 -0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
Patricia Molloy |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 08:04:53 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Visual Terrorism
|
Steve Devos |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:21:02 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:09:27 +0000 |
73 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
geska |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 11:42:14 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Visual Terrorism
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 10:10:55 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
Melis Behlil |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:52:18 +0200 |
103 lines |
Re: Visual Terrorism
|
eduardomauro |
Wed, 16 Nov 2005 05:36:24 -0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:33:28 -0800 |
49 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
Reinaldo A Uribe Muriel |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 22:25:29 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: Children smoking in films
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 18:51:08 -0800 |
37 lines |
Re: Visual Terrorism
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:24:28 -0500 |
74 lines |
Visual Terrorism
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:59:28 +0000 |
23 lines |
Request for Edgar G. Ulmer Info
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 12:50:10 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Jean Rouch info
|
Peter Wagstaff |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:45:28 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Philosophy as Film
|
Benjamin Noys |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:07:12 +0000 |
28 lines |
production context
|
Stan Jones |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:10:40 +1300 |
36 lines |
Philosophy as Film
|
Carlo C. Adorno |
Tue, 15 Nov 2005 06:38:35 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: production context
|
Catalin Brylla |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:56:51 -0800 |
76 lines |
Re: Rouch
|
Paul Grant |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:44:00 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 13 Nov 2005 to 14 Nov 2005 (#2005-380)
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 15:05:22 EST |
58 lines |
Re: Fwd: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Nov 2005 to 13 Nov 2005 (#2005-379)
|
sue taylor |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:07:38 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: Films as Philosophy
|
Steve Devos |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 12:52:29 -0000 |
75 lines |
Fwd: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Nov 2005 to 13 Nov 2005 (#2005-379)
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 07:26:29 EST |
122 lines |
Re: Films as Philosophy
|
Benjamin Noys |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 11:54:39 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Request for Jean Rouch Info
|
Thure Munkholm |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 10:24:18 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Films as Philosophy
|
Jason Rovito |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 02:15:30 -0500 |
55 lines |
Films as Philosophy
|
Carlo C. Adorno |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 05:36:49 +0000 |
22 lines |
Films as Philosophy
|
carlo cattaneo adorno |
Mon, 14 Nov 2005 05:28:31 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Request for Jean Rouch Info
|
Marina Vishmidt |
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 21:39:48 -0000 |
74 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Nov 2005 to 13 Nov 2005 (#2005-379)
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:14:52 EST |
60 lines |
Re: The Insider,dir Michael Mann
|
Eric Willstaedt |
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 19:08:29 EST |
70 lines |
Re: The Insider,dir Michael Mann
|
sue taylor |
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 23:21:50 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: Request for Jean Rouch Info
|
Alexander Shumski |
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:59:02 -0500 |
101 lines |
CFP Interval 2: Film can help us think thought
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:47:33 +0000 |
100 lines |
Request for Jean Rouch Info
|
Marina Vishmidt |
Sat, 12 Nov 2005 15:20:44 -0000 |
31 lines |
Les Gommes
|
Charles Brownson |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:27:16 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Charles Brownson |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:20:54 +0000 |
44 lines |
Mona Lisa's Smile
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 13:49:35 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: Yehuda Seems Willing?
|
yehuda stav |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 20:36:21 +0200 |
166 lines |
Yehuda Seems Willing?
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 10:53:59 -0500 |
142 lines |
Re: Would You Be Willing to Sell Your Mother?
|
yehuda stav |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 17:45:27 +0200 |
90 lines |
in response to Donovan's website query
|
Kent Farmer |
Wed, 9 Nov 2005 04:26:32 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
pedro tapajós |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 22:20:30 -0200 |
95 lines |
Would You Be Willing to Sell Your Mother?
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:33:06 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:11:47 -0500 |
43 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
eduardomauro |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:31:01 -0200 |
123 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:33:40 -0500 |
60 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Charles Brownson |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:32:24 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:18:29 +0000 |
75 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 09:49:33 -0500 |
110 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Steve Devos |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 14:31:50 -0000 |
44 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:21:27 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 12:00:12 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Andrew Court |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 21:33:37 +1100 |
27 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:27:56 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 3 Nov 2005 (#2005-368)
|
O'Shaughnessy, Martin |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 10:13:23 -0000 |
38 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 08:52:40 +0000 |
27 lines |
Herzog's "Heart Of Glass"
|
Kent Farmer |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 05:46:17 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 23:18:31 +0000 |
105 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:10:29 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:04:30 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:18:57 +0000 |
97 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 19:07:50 +0000 |
232 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY suckers?
|
christiaan cruz |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:37:31 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY suckers?
|
christiaan cruz |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:27:28 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 13:22:41 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
pedro tapajós |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:16:58 -0200 |
40 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
christiaan cruz |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 18:14:39 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHYall communists
|
Alan Fair |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:28:53 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 12:08:00 -0500 |
111 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY suckers?
|
Alan Fair |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 17:04:23 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:47:18 -0500 |
92 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?[Scanned]
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:44:55 -0000 |
84 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Steve Devos |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 16:35:51 -0000 |
79 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:03:24 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:56:29 -0500 |
97 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Steve Devos |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:47:21 -0000 |
51 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Steve Devos |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 15:39:32 -0000 |
71 lines |
is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Benjamin Noys |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 14:35:22 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Shaw, Dan |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:18:45 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:09:28 -0500 |
54 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Ben Gook |
Tue, 8 Nov 2005 00:58:48 +1100 |
38 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 08:48:31 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Steve Devos |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 11:28:14 -0000 |
22 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Stan Jones |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 10:15:43 +1300 |
32 lines |
Re: tsui hark From: "WING-FAI LEUNG" <[log in to unmask]>
|
Wing-Fai Leung |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:48:17 +0000 |
27 lines |
found smthing 'bout surrealism
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:22:25 +0100 |
134 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Ben Gook |
Mon, 7 Nov 2005 09:09:26 +1100 |
37 lines |
Re: is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 6 Nov 2005 16:53:16 -0500 |
83 lines |
Film criticism: Ingmar Bergman and Pauline Kael
|
Dan Garrett |
Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:14:14 -0800 |
117 lines |
Sally Potter's Yes & Other Recent Films
|
Dan Garrett |
Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:10:10 -0800 |
75 lines |
is there a conservative film aesthetic/analysis?
|
Chuck Kleinhans |
Sun, 6 Nov 2005 13:37:11 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: Filming Nice[Scanned]
|
John Marmysz |
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 16:47:18 EST |
48 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 4 Nov 2005 to 5 Nov 2005 - Special issue (#2005-370)
|
Landon Bradley |
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 20:59:33 +0000 |
29 lines |
9.44 Nochimson on NYFF 2005
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 15:47:57 +0000 |
601 lines |
Re: Filming Nice[Scanned]
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 10:34:58 -0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Tsui Hark
|
LO yuenyee |
Sat, 5 Nov 2005 01:58:55 -0800 |
72 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
John Marmysz |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:22:16 EST |
49 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
christiaan cruz |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 23:55:21 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 21:28:32 +0000 |
171 lines |
Tsui Hark
|
Ken Chen |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:36:46 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:26:34 -0800 |
59 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
Enid Mabbott |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 12:18:56 -0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 10:40:38 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
Enid Mabbott |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 09:24:47 -0000 |
24 lines |
Film-Philosophy Netiquette
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 4 Nov 2005 01:10:06 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:21:08 +0000 |
72 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 23:14:34 +0000 |
53 lines |
Collaborative Spectatorship
|
Daniel Barnett |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 12:13:33 EST |
95 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:42:50 -0800 |
55 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
Patricia Molloy |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:52:59 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
Catalin Brylla |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:50:12 -0800 |
75 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
Catalin Brylla |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:46:17 -0800 |
72 lines |
Re: Filming Nice
|
Catalin Brylla |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:45:00 -0800 |
82 lines |
Filming Nice
|
Isabelle McNeill |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 14:59:39 +0000 |
109 lines |
Re: Collaborative Spectatorship
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 11:28:18 +0100 |
179 lines |
Re: Collaborative Spectatorship
|
Jim Flannery |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 01:57:49 -0800 |
30 lines |
Re: Collaborative Spectatorship
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 09:30:06 +0000 |
42 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
christiaan cruz |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 00:50:38 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
Enid Mabbott |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 22:52:22 -0000 |
21 lines |
Re: Lang's Death of a Career Girl
|
Adrian Martin |
Thu, 3 Nov 2005 07:34:56 +1100 |
25 lines |
magicians and cinema
|
martha rosler |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:53:03 +0100 |
68 lines |
Collaborative Spectatorship
|
Daniel Barnett |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:19:10 EST |
52 lines |
Reply to Koehler on the magic origins of film
|
Daniel Barnett |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:17:27 EST |
62 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
christiaan cruz |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 18:05:45 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
Tara Hadid |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:10:35 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
Enid Mabbott |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 17:08:07 -0000 |
26 lines |
Re: 9 today
|
christiaan cruz |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 16:41:36 +0000 |
33 lines |
9 today
|
Lucy Bolton |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 12:23:48 -0000 |
48 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 30 Oct 2005 to 31 Oct 2005 (#2005-362)
|
Ramona Fotiade |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:52:41 +0000 |
38 lines |
Film-Philosophy is 9
|
Benjamin Noys |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:56:00 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Film-Philosophy is 9
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:45:54 +0100 |
34 lines |
Collaborative Spectatorship
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:38:50 +0000 |
21 lines |
Reply to Koehler on the magic origins of film
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 10:04:26 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: Mock-Documentary
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:59:06 +0100 |
134 lines |
Re: Mock-Documentary
|
<> |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 13:19:18 +1000 |
311 lines |
Re: Mock-Documentary
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:12:26 -0800 |
64 lines |
Re: Film-Philosophy is 9
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 19:10:30 -0500 |
35 lines |
Film-Philosophy is 9
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 23:07:18 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Mock-Documentary
|
Peter Hughes |
Wed, 2 Nov 2005 09:05:33 +1100 |
47 lines |
Mock-Documentary
|
Kiarash Anvari |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 13:30:39 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: British TV Drama and US Imports (Reading University)
|
Lee Parpart |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 14:44:29 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 31 Oct 2005 to 1 Nov 2005 - Special issue (#2005-363)
|
Robert Koehler |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:53:40 -0800 |
66 lines |
Re: anais nin and the mise-en-scene of intellectual imbalance (Post Artaudian Deleuziana)
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:43:51 -0800 |
299 lines |
Re: primeval cinema
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:22:06 -0800 |
54 lines |
Re: Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 04:20:53 -0800 |
187 lines |
Re: primeval cinema
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 10:00:33 +0100 |
326 lines |
primeval cinema
|
julie@yahoo |
Tue, 1 Nov 2005 16:11:17 +1100 |
109 lines |
Re: Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Stephan Pickering |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 22:14:51 EST |
84 lines |
Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Maria H. Spector |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 21:47:13 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 30 Oct 2005 to 31 Oct 2005 (#2005-362)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:49:42 -0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Surrealism, Cinema, Psychoanalysis
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:44:34 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Surrealism, Cinema, Psychoanalysis
|
SEAN HOMER |
Mon, 31 Oct 2005 07:50:46 +0200 |
38 lines |
Surrealism and Psychoanalysis + setting question
|
Maria H. Spector |
Sun, 30 Oct 2005 19:46:19 -0000 |
29 lines |
Re: Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:11:00 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Anthony Richards |
Sun, 30 Oct 2005 11:43:16 -0000 |
71 lines |
Re: InterCulture CFP: Evil Sisters
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:14:36 -0700 |
110 lines |
Re: InterCulture CFP: Evil Sisters
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 13:53:26 -0700 |
144 lines |
Re: Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 16:20:07 -0400 |
51 lines |
Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Maria H. Spector |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 20:32:17 +0100 |
27 lines |
The Perfect Medium - Perspective - Shadow Theatre around the world
|
Visual-Media |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 14:32:42 +0200 |
106 lines |
Re: Information Request
|
Mary Fox |
Sat, 29 Oct 2005 00:10:14 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: cinema, psychoanalysis, surrealism
|
Sarah Nichols |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:57:57 -0700 |
70 lines |
Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Maria H. Spector |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:52:16 +0100 |
30 lines |
CFP: British TV Drama and US Imports (Reading University)
|
Simone Knox |
Fri, 28 Oct 2005 11:29:37 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: Surrealism and Psychoanalysis
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:32:15 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: why i won't see XMEN 3
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:38:42 -0700 |
120 lines |
Re: Information Request
|
Catalin Brylla |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:25:02 -0700 |
58 lines |
Re: Information Request
|
SEAN HOMER |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:51:35 +0300 |
26 lines |
criterion dvd
|
Nathan Andersen |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:14:06 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Criterion DVD
|
Tery (Teo) Hardwicke |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 14:12:06 +1300 |
27 lines |
Re: Criterion DVD
|
Michelle Langford |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 12:20:06 +1000 |
50 lines |
Criterion DVD
|
Michelle Langford |
Thu, 27 Oct 2005 10:40:07 +1000 |
34 lines |
Re: Interval reminder
|
paradogs |
Wed, 26 Oct 2005 13:06:19 -0400 |
245 lines |
MA Theatre and Consciousness
|
Dr Daniel Meyer-Dinkgrafe |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 10:43:22 +0100 |
97 lines |
Re: Aesthetics of Violence in Film
|
elicat |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:42:49 +1000 |
74 lines |
Re: Aesthetics of Violence in Film
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:53:11 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Aesthetics of Violence in Film
|
Shaw, Dan |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 21:18:21 -0400 |
75 lines |
Aesthetics of Violence in Film
|
Ben Gook |
Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:02:10 +1000 |
38 lines |
Academic Analysis of Prophetic Film
|
darkwater |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:45:26 -0700 |
41 lines |
CALL FOR PAPERS
|
Fliguoro |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:44:15 +0200 |
217 lines |
Re: empty time
|
Haukur Már Helgason |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:06:34 +0000 |
27 lines |
Local Film Culture, Global Exchange
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 18:03:48 +0100 |
64 lines |
empty time
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:30:42 GMT |
64 lines |
Leaving the list and changing your subscription
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 12:03:09 +0100 |
142 lines |
Re: Empty Time
|
trevor |
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 10:09:39 +1000 |
620 lines |
Re: nihilism
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:28:01 -0700 |
152 lines |
Re: Empty Time
|
Haukur Már Helgason |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 18:27:16 +0000 |
158 lines |
Re: Fwd: Experienced Reviewer Required
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 07:52:27 -0700 |
92 lines |
Re: The Immersion of Film-Philo
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 14:59:46 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: The Immersion of Film-Philo
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:00:28 -0700 |
109 lines |
Re: Empty Time
|
Jim Flannery |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 02:39:07 -0700 |
31 lines |
Salon Netiquette
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 23 Oct 2005 03:03:14 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Empty Time
|
Seth Johnson |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 16:38:45 -0700 |
68 lines |
Re: The Immersion of Film-Philo
|
Mike Frank |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 19:19:49 -0400 |
88 lines |
Re: Fwd: Postings
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:42:15 -0700 |
87 lines |
Fwd: Postings
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:11:14 EDT |
125 lines |
Fwd: Experienced Reviewer Required
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 13:02:29 EDT |
202 lines |
Empty Time
|
Glen Norton |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:23:01 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: must...change..subject
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 08:18:01 -0700 |
620 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans[Scanned]
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:46:50 +0100 |
162 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:32:14 -0700 |
129 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 03:21:09 -0700 |
143 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans
|
WmmvrrvrrmmrrvrrvmmW |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 10:44:07 +0100 |
40 lines |
Fwd: Experienced Reviewer Required
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 05:26:53 EDT |
139 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
julie@yahoo |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:31:34 +1000 |
354 lines |
Re: Gunning
|
julie@yahoo |
Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:04:52 +1000 |
184 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans
|
pedro tapajós |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:08:16 -0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Fight Club and Destroying Beauty
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:08:03 -0700 |
138 lines |
empty time thread
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 19:40:17 GMT |
48 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:58:02 -0700 |
138 lines |
Fwd: Digest for 10/21
|
Richard Armstrong |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 14:46:53 EDT |
115 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans
|
Nicholas Ruiz |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:06:07 -0400 |
61 lines |
Odd Man Out
|
Cheryl Herr |
Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:15:21 -0500 |
22 lines |
The meaningless wager
|
Glen Norton |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 15:53:14 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: technological development
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:42:30 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans
|
Joyes Burris |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:30:54 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: The Immersion of New Orleans
|
bill harris |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 11:20:50 -0500 |
431 lines |
Re: Experienced Reviewer Required
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 08:47:24 -0700 |
99 lines |
The Immersion of New Orleans
|
Nicholas Ruiz |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:49:51 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: Experienced Reviewer Required
|
Elly Friedman |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:02:53 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: off topic, discard if undesired.
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 04:51:10 -0700 |
145 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
michaelP |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 12:43:25 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 07:43:22 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
julie@yahoo |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 20:01:34 +1000 |
196 lines |
Gothic Nightmares, Fusili, Blake and the Romantic Imagination
|
Visual-Media |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:21:51 +0200 |
64 lines |
metamorphosis
|
Laura Jean Carroll |
Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:59:18 +1000 |
28 lines |
Experienced Reviewer Required
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:17:52 EDT |
77 lines |
unsubscribe
|
Peter Taylor |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 20:28:05 +0200 |
107 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 11:36:30 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:56:11 -0700 |
124 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 07:39:09 -0400 |
40 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:12:13 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: technological development
|
Nicky Hamlyn |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 10:45:01 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: metamorphosis
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:59:55 -0700 |
49 lines |
technological development
|
julie@yahoo |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 16:26:51 +1000 |
102 lines |
metamorphosis
|
julie@yahoo |
Wed, 19 Oct 2005 14:27:21 +1000 |
102 lines |
Re: Conference: Thinking in/after Utopia
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 07:48:30 -0700 |
118 lines |
Re: Conference: Thinking in/after Utopia
|
LO yuenyee |
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 21:19:04 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Conference: Thinking in/after Utopia
|
adetayo shittu |
Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:59:46 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Conference: Thinking in/after Utopia
|
dammy Babs |
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 12:30:47 -0700 |
263 lines |
film review - Paradise Now
|
sobhi al-Zobaidi |
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:48:45 +0200 |
334 lines |
Conference: Thinking in/after Utopia
|
Costica Bradatan |
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 15:51:16 +0000 |
193 lines |
Re: CFP: European Horror Cinema
|
Isabelle Vanderschelden |
Thu, 13 Oct 2005 08:19:24 +0100 |
48 lines |
CFP: European Horror Cinema
|
Patricia Allmer |
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:32:30 +0100 |
105 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY -teaching
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 12 Oct 2005 09:19:52 +0100 |
39 lines |
Subject: text book question
|
Lucy Fraser |
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:28:36 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: text book question
|
Michelle Langford |
Tue, 11 Oct 2005 10:32:10 +1000 |
106 lines |
text book question
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:39:21 -0400 |
116 lines |
Notebook
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 13:07:32 EDT |
68 lines |
Re: Cinephiles notebook
|
Tala |
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 22:23:43 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: invite to Interval (1) conference
|
paradogs |
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 21:31:51 -0400 |
121 lines |
Cinephiles notebook
|
Ross Macleay |
Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:10:55 +1000 |
107 lines |
Re: Narratology Terms & Film
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 11:18:00 -0500 |
37 lines |
Narratology Terms & Film
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 10:26:28 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: film institution
|
indra karan |
Sat, 8 Oct 2005 21:25:20 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: film institution
|
indra karan |
Sat, 8 Oct 2005 21:23:47 -0700 |
68 lines |
Re: film institution
|
Ben Gook |
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 13:16:53 +1000 |
33 lines |
Re: Diegesis
|
Adrian Martin |
Sun, 9 Oct 2005 10:08:19 +1000 |
41 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 6 Oct 2005 to 8 Oct 2005 (#2005-336)
|
Robert Koehler |
Sat, 8 Oct 2005 15:35:03 -0700 |
52 lines |
film institution
|
Ying |
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 23:35:20 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Re . . . and diegesis(worried about deconstruction)
|
indra karan |
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 18:04:58 -0700 |
123 lines |
Re: Re . . . and diegesis(worried about deconstruction)
|
Jim Flannery |
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:35:17 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Re . . . and diegesis(worried about deconstruction)
|
indra karan |
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 16:14:53 -0700 |
99 lines |
Re: . . . and diegesis(worried about deconstruction)
|
Jim Flannery |
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 12:49:13 -0700 |
30 lines |
. . . and diegesis(worried about deconstruction)
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 15:31:55 -0400 |
113 lines |
Re: Re . . . and diegesis(worried about deconstruction)
|
Jim Flannery |
Fri, 7 Oct 2005 11:59:38 -0700 |
53 lines |
Super 8 in India
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 6 Oct 2005 04:57:35 EDT |
56 lines |
Re: Super8 in India
|
Romeo Grünfelder |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 21:41:02 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: Super 8 in India
|
indra karan |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:09:03 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: The Usual Suspects
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 18:23:38 +0100 |
100 lines |
Re: Temporal Art
|
Peter Wagstaff |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:05:45 +0100 |
39 lines |
Temporal Art
|
Dean Summers |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 09:36:01 +0100 |
30 lines |
Super 8 in India
|
Anke Zechner |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 10:02:46 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: Thematic elements within the Zombie film.
|
eduardomauro |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 02:08:01 -0300 |
43 lines |
Re: Thematic elements within the Zombie film.
|
christiaan cruz |
Wed, 5 Oct 2005 01:25:40 +0000 |
18 lines |
Thematic elements within the Zombie film.
|
BradfordJeremy |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 19:01:17 -0500 |
66 lines |
List Admin
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 20:09:26 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Help!
|
Julia.Rice |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 18:50:15 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: The Usual Suspects
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 08:59:04 -0700 |
122 lines |
Help!
|
tony jackson |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 09:06:19 -0400 |
56 lines |
AW: Temporal Art
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 15:04:13 +0200 |
35 lines |
Temporal Art
|
Ange Tack |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 13:54:08 +0100 |
25 lines |
Two cinema conferences: homosexuality/diaspora
|
Phil Powrie |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 10:20:26 +0100 |
538 lines |
Re: Schrader's Transcendental Style
|
Adam Dewhirst |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:12:51 +1000 |
24 lines |
Re: Schrader's Transcendental Style
|
Adam Dewhirst |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 17:10:53 +1000 |
24 lines |
Re: to a critic writing young
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:50:53 -0700 |
151 lines |
to a critic writing young
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:44:03 -0400 |
106 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation and diegesis
|
Sonja milka Bertucci |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:42:59 -0400 |
110 lines |
Schrader's Transcendental Style
|
Glen Norton |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:41:07 -0400 |
24 lines |
New Review of Film and Television Studies
|
Warren Buckland |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:08:34 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: 'Temporal Art'
|
pedro tapajós |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:04:50 -0300 |
176 lines |
Re: 'Temporal Art'
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 13:52:02 -0400 |
207 lines |
'Temporal Art'
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 12:24:04 +0200 |
158 lines |
The Usual Suspects
|
Herbert Schwaab |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 11:40:34 +0200 |
164 lines |
Re: Re . . . and diegesis(worried about deconstruction)
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 01:12:25 -0700 |
135 lines |
Re: Re . . . and diegesis
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 01:03:59 -0700 |
81 lines |
Re: diegesis
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 01:02:27 -0700 |
151 lines |
diegesis
|
Warren Buckland |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 03:30:17 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: diagesis and diegesis
|
michaelP |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 07:20:37 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation and diegesis
|
Ross Macleay |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:34:05 +1000 |
23 lines |
diagesis and diegesis
|
Ross Macleay |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 15:32:39 +1000 |
27 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation and diegesis
|
piers smith |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 06:20:48 +0100 |
70 lines |
meta-adaptation
|
Laura Jean Carroll |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 14:45:09 +1000 |
50 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation and diegesis
|
michaelP |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 05:06:06 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re . . . and diegesis
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 21:35:18 -0400 |
73 lines |
Re: Cinema as Poetry
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 21:21:19 -0300 |
83 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation and diegesis
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 21:20:41 -0300 |
34 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation and diegesis
|
Ross Macleay |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:26:49 +1000 |
28 lines |
Re: the usual suspects
|
Ross Macleay |
Mon, 3 Oct 2005 09:20:18 +1000 |
28 lines |
Florey's Hollywood Boulevard
|
Jane |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 21:34:57 +1000 |
67 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation and diegesis
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 01:18:47 -0700 |
83 lines |
meta-adaptation and diegesis
|
Ross Macleay |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 17:10:28 +1000 |
107 lines |
Re: the usual suspects
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 1 Oct 2005 22:34:02 -0700 |
76 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation
|
Ben Gook |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 12:32:29 +1000 |
37 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation
|
Roy I.Gokay-Wol |
Sat, 1 Oct 2005 19:19:30 -0700 |
32 lines |
meta-adaptation
|
Ross Macleay |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 11:21:05 +1000 |
89 lines |
the usual suspects
|
Ross Macleay |
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 11:17:29 +1000 |
74 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:57:29 -0700 |
692 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 27 Sep 2005 to 28 Sep 2005 (#2005-327)
|
Justin Ions |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:59:39 +0100 |
12 lines |
Re: meta-adaptation
|
Adrian Martin |
Thu, 29 Sep 2005 07:43:37 +1000 |
67 lines |
Re: meta-adaptations of the early 1990s
|
Revolver Ocelot |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 21:59:53 +0100 |
19 lines |
Schaulust: Sehmaschinen, Optische Theater & andere Spektakel
|
Visual-Media |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:26:48 +0200 |
197 lines |
Re: meta-adaptations of the early 1990s
|
Revolver Ocelot |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 19:40:31 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: meta-adaptations of the early 1990s
|
Farris Wahbeh |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:13:28 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: meta-adaptations of the early 1990s
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 04:16:48 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: meta-adaptations of the early 1990s
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 07:05:34 -0400 |
33 lines |
meta-adaptations of the early 1990s
|
daniel herbert |
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:47:12 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Fight Club
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:19:51 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Fight Club
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 20:58:18 -0700 |
105 lines |
Re: Fight Club
|
Ryan E. Allen |
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:23:57 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Interval (2) call for papers and film/video submissions
|
paradogs |
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:14:42 -0400 |
223 lines |
latin american cinema
|
Miriam Ross |
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 11:34:35 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically: back to square one
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:04:17 -0700 |
75 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically: back to square one
|
pedro tapajós |
Mon, 26 Sep 2005 02:27:47 -0300 |
105 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically: back to square one
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 21:42:48 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically: back to square one
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 21:41:07 -0400 |
53 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically: back to square one
|
pedro tapajós |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 20:06:04 -0300 |
24 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically: back to square one
|
Farris Wahbeh |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 23:53:22 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 17:04:08 -0300 |
46 lines |
dancing diegetically: back to square one
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:36:21 -0400 |
128 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:05:23 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: astaire
|
Alan Fair |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 13:33:44 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 06:32:57 -0300 |
128 lines |
Opening Cinémathèque Française - Paris (PASSION CI NEMA) and more!
|
Visual-Media |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 09:29:23 +0200 |
244 lines |
Film Remakes
|
Ali Titchener |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 15:11:46 +0930 |
136 lines |
Re: Singing
|
Mike Frank |
Sat, 24 Sep 2005 23:17:44 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: dancing diegetically
|
Farris Wahbeh |
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 02:42:55 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: grizzly man
|
Matt Christie |
Sat, 24 Sep 2005 20:20:46 -0400 |
173 lines |
dancing diegetically
|
Mike Frank |
Sat, 24 Sep 2005 20:07:26 -0400 |
75 lines |
grizzly man
|
Sarah Nichols |
Sat, 24 Sep 2005 16:35:28 -0700 |
81 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 22 Sep 2005 to 23 Sep 2005 (#2005-321)
|
Alan Fair |
Sat, 24 Sep 2005 10:15:05 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Singing
|
Rose Theresa |
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 20:03:13 -0400 |
42 lines |
Kritikos, Volume II, September 2005
|
Nicholas Ruiz |
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:50:36 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Singing
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 14:25:53 -0400 |
97 lines |
Re: Singing
|
Revolver Ocelot |
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 19:02:25 +0100 |
26 lines |
Singing
|
David Brottman |
Fri, 23 Sep 2005 00:33:28 -0500 |
48 lines |
Singers Seamlessly Singing
|
David Brottman |
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 09:59:12 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Singers Seamlessly Singing
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 12:25:38 -0400 |
27 lines |
graduate conference CFP: Cinema Studies' Historical Turn
|
Joshua Yumibe |
Thu, 22 Sep 2005 11:09:15 -0500 |
240 lines |
Re: AW: [FILM-PHILOSOPHY] permissions
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 19:16:38 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 20 Sep 2005 to 21 Sep 2005 (#2005-319)
|
Jason Rovito |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 14:06:15 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: Fight Club
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 16:25:04 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Fight Club
|
Ryan E. Allen |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:42:31 -0400 |
73 lines |
Re: AW: [FILM-PHILOSOPHY] permissions
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 08:18:46 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: AW: [FILM-PHILOSOPHY] permissions
|
eduardomauro |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 00:34:25 -0300 |
28 lines |
Re: AW: [FILM-PHILOSOPHY] permissions
|
julia kristanciuk |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:57:47 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: AW: [FILM-PHILOSOPHY] permissions
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:12:59 -0700 |
44 lines |
AW: [FILM-PHILOSOPHY] permissions
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:38:58 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: Lumiere permissions
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:19:31 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: permissions
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 08:07:24 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: Lumiere permissions
|
Dave Clarke |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:32:55 +0100 |
86 lines |
permissions
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:30:28 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: Lumiere permissions
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 12:23:10 +0100 |
53 lines |
Lumiere permissions
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Tue, 20 Sep 2005 11:49:16 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Fight Club
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 22:48:47 -0700 |
55 lines |
Fight Club
|
atil eylem atakav |
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 21:47:44 +0100 |
42 lines |
The War of worlds of Spielberg
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:14:29 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: Slavoj Zizek
|
[log in to unmask] |
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 12:29:11 +0100 |
168 lines |
Re: MA courses
|
Rob Luzecky |
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 07:22:34 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: philo and formalism
|
eduardomauro |
Mon, 19 Sep 2005 02:57:14 -0300 |
20 lines |
Slavoj Zizek
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:37:18 +0100 |
67 lines |
Re: MA courses
|
greatnotion |
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:55:37 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: MA courses
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Sun, 18 Sep 2005 10:59:28 +0100 |
38 lines |
MA courses
|
Matthew Thorpe |
Sat, 17 Sep 2005 00:26:23 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: philo and formalism
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:43:10 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: philo and formalism
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 10:40:54 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: philo and formalism
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 09:37:11 -0500 |
52 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Farris Wahbeh |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 15:21:06 +0100 |
50 lines |
philo and formalism
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:49:21 -0400 |
100 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:37:12 -0700 |
74 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:34:31 -0700 |
110 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:18:21 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 00:11:20 -0700 |
81 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:35:42 -0300 |
35 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:29:46 -0300 |
23 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 03:28:37 -0300 |
21 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 22:28:18 -0700 |
117 lines |
Re: Recognition and film
|
jmatturr |
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:48:59 -0400 |
125 lines |
Re: Recognition and film
|
ali kashani |
Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:32:19 -0700 |
92 lines |
Re: Film remakes
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:46:15 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
paulgoman |
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:26:02 +0100 |
382 lines |
Re: Film remakes
|
Katy Stevens |
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 18:05:56 +1000 |
47 lines |
Re: Film remakes
|
pedro tapajós |
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 02:02:49 -0300 |
45 lines |
Re: Film remakes
|
Jia Jun |
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 11:31:45 +0800 |
28 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
[log in to unmask] |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:16:20 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: Recognition and film
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:06:25 -0400 |
330 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Stan Jones |
Wed, 14 Sep 2005 09:59:28 +1200 |
131 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Julia.Rice |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 22:36:13 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Thomas Deane Tucker |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:10:21 -0600 |
76 lines |
Re: Hegel on Recognition and film
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 16:38:26 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: New Scottish Cinema November event
|
Jonathan Murray |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 21:27:53 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Recognition and film
|
Cara O'Connor |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 13:06:37 -0700 |
127 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:09:36 -0400 |
164 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
pedro tapajós |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:55:48 -0300 |
46 lines |
Recognition and film
|
Matthew Dougherty |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:51:48 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Michael Beltz |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 11:56:54 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Rob Luzecky |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 15:10:57 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:04:12 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Melis Behlil |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:01:08 +0300 |
119 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:32:03 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Anna Hindley |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:15:35 +0000 |
92 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 05:06:01 -0700 |
84 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
paulgoman |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 12:53:28 +0100 |
171 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Catalin Brylla |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 03:37:45 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:58:22 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Amir Bazrafshan |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:49:23 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Film Remakes
|
Margarida palma |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 09:31:01 +0000 |
29 lines |
Film Remakes
|
Ali Titchener |
Tue, 13 Sep 2005 18:27:31 +0930 |
191 lines |
Film Magazine Sub
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sun, 11 Sep 2005 13:42:57 EDT |
52 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 8 Sep 2005 to 9 Sep 2005 (#2005-306)
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 10 Sep 2005 18:06:23 +0100 |
86 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 8 Sep 2005 to 9 Sep 2005 (#2005-306)
|
Miriam Ross |
Sat, 10 Sep 2005 15:39:25 +0100 |
61 lines |
Second CFP: The Situated Body (A Special Issue of Janus Head)
|
Costica Bradatan |
Sat, 10 Sep 2005 03:21:05 +0000 |
460 lines |
CFP: South Eastern European Cinema
|
Warren Buckland |
Fri, 9 Sep 2005 21:31:16 -0400 |
66 lines |
Re: Deleuze help!
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 13:31:33 -0700 |
77 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 7 Sep 2005 (#2005-304)
|
<> |
Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:17:41 EDT |
49 lines |
Re: Kubrick
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 20:54:10 -0400 |
154 lines |
Re: deleuze help!
|
philip pocock |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 23:55:43 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: Kubrick
|
Sarah Nichols |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:25:38 -0700 |
62 lines |
dl on dv
|
Gibran da rocha Bento |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:42:35 -0300 |
122 lines |
Kubrick
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:08:54 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: deleuze help!
|
Martin.Chappell |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 16:10:21 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: deleuze help!
|
philip pocock |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 14:13:34 +0200 |
84 lines |
SFC News
|
Phil Powrie |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 08:20:34 +0100 |
216 lines |
Re: deleuze help!
|
Glen Fuller |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 11:52:20 +1000 |
94 lines |
Re: Deleuze help!
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 7 Sep 2005 00:52:34 +0100 |
43 lines |
Re: Cinema as Poetry
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 18:34:09 -0400 |
166 lines |
Re: Cinema as Poetry
|
Seth Johnson |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 16:31:19 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: Cinema as Poetry
|
Jim Flannery |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 12:01:26 -0700 |
44 lines |
Cinema as Poetry
|
Daniel Barnett |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:10:00 EDT |
86 lines |
Re: deluze
|
Alan Fair |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 18:57:30 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: deleuze help!
|
tony jackson |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 13:17:08 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: Deleuze help!
|
philip pocock |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 16:49:27 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: Deleuze help!
|
tony jackson |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 09:36:58 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: Cinema as Poetry
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 08:57:23 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 11:05:59 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: who's out there- digital vs film
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 23:22:30 EDT |
138 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Rob Luzecky |
Tue, 6 Sep 2005 02:53:08 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 1 Sep 2005 to 2 Sep 2005 (#2005-296)
|
Troth Vicky |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 12:17:03 +0100 |
214 lines |
music score for the Kim Ki-Duk's "3 irons"
|
yehuda stav |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:12:44 +0300 |
27 lines |
music score for the Kim Ki-Duk's "3 Irons"
|
yehuda stav |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 13:05:06 +0300 |
26 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 03:59:35 EDT |
88 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 03:36:42 EDT |
126 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Seth Johnson |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 02:55:17 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
eduardomauro |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 03:22:41 -0300 |
27 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Steven Budden |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 20:35:27 EDT |
85 lines |
Re: Deleuze help!
|
philip pocock |
Mon, 5 Sep 2005 00:10:13 +0200 |
52 lines |
CFP: Secrets and Spies: Reading Alias
|
Stacey Abbott |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 22:09:27 +0100 |
103 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 22:02:25 +0100 |
131 lines |
A Few Attributes of "Poetic" Cinema
|
David Brottman |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 12:56:42 -0700 |
65 lines |
Deleuze help!
|
tony jackson |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 15:18:14 -0400 |
199 lines |
film as Poetry
|
Steven Elworth |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:14:03 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Cinema as Poetry
|
jmatturr |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 11:12:10 -0400 |
30 lines |
POETICS (was Re: AMEN)
|
Seth Johnson |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:55:52 -0400 |
72 lines |
Re: Cinema as Poetry
|
Paul Gallagher |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:46:22 -0400 |
23 lines |
Cinema as Poetry
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 10:28:40 EDT |
67 lines |
Re: cinema poetry; Eisenstein and Tarkovsky
|
Rob Luzecky |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 14:18:50 +0000 |
110 lines |
AMEN
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 09:36:55 -0400 |
99 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 13:40:56 +0100 |
71 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
michael mouracade |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:13:13 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
M Jones |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:19:30 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
M Jones |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 02:05:17 -0400 |
28 lines |
post-classical/avant garde films
|
Jane |
Sun, 4 Sep 2005 15:04:05 +1000 |
106 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Nathan Andersen |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 21:22:40 -0400 |
123 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
jmatturr |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 17:09:09 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
julia kristanciuk |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 13:29:54 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: Trinh Minh Ha
|
Sylvie Blum-Reid |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 15:40:19 -0400 |
66 lines |
Film Studies
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 14:27:15 EDT |
68 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Paul Iannone |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 07:58:36 -0700 |
102 lines |
Re: Trinh Minh Ha
|
Rose Theresa |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 09:35:14 -0400 |
43 lines |
Trinh Minh Ha
|
Magnus Danerek |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 15:26:26 +0200 |
48 lines |
Re: cinema poetry
|
Rob Luzecky |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 12:01:20 +0000 |
22 lines |
cinema poetry
|
rizal faozan |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 10:41:37 +0200 |
121 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
eduardomauro |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 03:13:53 -0300 |
181 lines |
Re: triggerstreet.com
|
eduardomauro |
Sat, 3 Sep 2005 02:24:16 -0300 |
25 lines |
Re: triggerstreet.com
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 06:38:14 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Teaching Film
|
Shaw, Dan |
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 06:55:00 -0400 |
32 lines |
Teaching Film
|
Griffin, Ruth |
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 11:50:20 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: triggerstreet.com
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 05:40:21 -0300 |
19 lines |
Peter Bork døde den 31.oktober 2004
|
Peter Bork |
Fri, 2 Sep 2005 01:04:18 +0100 |
23 lines |
SFC news
|
Phil Powrie |
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 15:13:48 +0100 |
64 lines |
Deleuze Day Conference 17 September
|
Anna Powell |
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:17:35 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: mea maxima culpa
|
Andrew Court |
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 18:58:53 +1000 |
24 lines |
Re: Question about listserv
|
Benjamin Lim |
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 03:22:52 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Teaching Film
|
lysa rivera |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:55:05 -0700 |
30 lines |
Teaching Film
|
julia kristanciuk |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 16:40:02 -0700 |
54 lines |
Re: Question about listserv
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 15:55:55 -0700 |
83 lines |
Re: Question about listserv
|
Katy Stevens |
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 08:31:24 +1000 |
37 lines |
Spectator 26.2 CFP
|
Dan Leopard |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 14:54:01 -0700 |
177 lines |
Question about listserv
|
Benjamin Lim |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 21:33:29 +0100 |
20 lines |
Film-Philosophy CFP 2005
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:49:30 +0100 |
229 lines |
Re: anywhere?
|
Steven Budden |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 12:18:51 -0400 |
133 lines |
anywhere?
|
Barbara Keating |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 08:35:29 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
philip pocock |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 05:15:20 +0200 |
49 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Carl van der Walt |
Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:31:04 +0200 |
119 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:12:41 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 18:12:11 -0400 |
66 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:53:51 -0400 |
143 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:53:26 -0400 |
143 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:52:33 -0400 |
143 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Carl van der Walt |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 23:20:19 +0200 |
111 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:00:11 -0700 |
73 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:58:16 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: cenno of velia
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:55:15 -0700 |
144 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 12:26:45 -0400 |
73 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:10:44 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:17:06 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:14:24 EDT |
53 lines |
Re: mea maxima culpa
|
michael benton |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 09:18:58 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:48:18 -0400 |
60 lines |
who's out there
|
Barbara Keating |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 08:20:01 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: mea maxima culpa
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:29:46 -0700 |
102 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Paul Gallagher |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:39:39 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Benjamin J Lim |
Tue, 30 Aug 2005 00:02:38 -0400 |
65 lines |
mea maxima culpa
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:54:49 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:28:29 EDT |
91 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
michael benton |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:56:49 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
bill harris |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:19:04 -0500 |
289 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:03:24 EDT |
51 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 21:01:46 EDT |
52 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:58:39 -0400 |
117 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:56:08 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Brian Hutton |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 23:45:44 +0100 |
174 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
michael benton |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:39:54 -0500 |
87 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 18:14:14 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 17:35:26 -0400 |
124 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:13:35 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:05:03 -0400 |
99 lines |
Re: Hitchcock/Lang query "Originality"
|
Ken Mogg |
Mon, 29 Aug 2005 16:51:24 +1000 |
53 lines |
Re: NOASS
|
arturasbumsteinas |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 20:08:21 -0000 |
54 lines |
NOASS
|
Christian Katti |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 22:05:41 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: zen, the mise-en-scene and thegnostic existentialist 3
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:45:16 -0700 |
358 lines |
Re: CFPs: SCMS Caucus on Class
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:38:44 -0700 |
244 lines |
Re: zen and filmmaking and the gnostic existentialist 2
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:32:00 -0700 |
561 lines |
Re: zen, screenplay and the gnostic existentialist
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:15:19 -0700 |
351 lines |
Re: The use of Psalms in Warfare
|
michael mouracade |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 13:00:05 -0500 |
61 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 10:05:54 -0700 |
332 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Brian Hutton |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 17:16:08 +0100 |
318 lines |
Re: The use of Psalms in Warfare
|
Robert W. Ferris |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:05:30 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 11:09:31 -0400 |
42 lines |
The use of Psalms in Warfare
|
JSVASSAR |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 07:31:57 -0500 |
316 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
paulgoman |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 12:52:04 +0100 |
191 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 03:50:25 -0700 |
82 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 07:04:33 -0300 |
112 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 02:42:08 -0700 |
165 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 05:21:56 -0300 |
32 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Brian Hutton |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 08:16:58 +0100 |
114 lines |
post-classical/avant garde flows
|
Jane |
Sun, 28 Aug 2005 09:21:30 +1000 |
106 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Steven Budden |
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 18:06:36 EDT |
93 lines |
Re: festival advice
|
Patricia Molloy |
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 14:22:27 -0400 |
59 lines |
festival advice
|
Joan Guenther |
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 12:29:34 -0400 |
46 lines |
R: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 26 Aug 2005 (#2005-284)
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:27:57 +0200 |
84 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
philip pocock |
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 02:15:00 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: R: anime and manga
|
Eric Willstaedt |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 19:06:27 EDT |
102 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 26 Aug 2005 (#2005-284)
|
David Surman |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 20:25:56 +0100 |
56 lines |
R: anime and manga
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 21:02:12 +0200 |
41 lines |
A Propos de Nice, La Suite
|
Isabelle McNeill |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 17:46:02 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 25 Aug 2005 to 26 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-282)
|
paulgoman |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:40:03 +0100 |
337 lines |
Re: anime and manga
|
Elly Friedman |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:35:48 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: ANIME
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 08:44:45 -0400 |
129 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 25 Aug 2005 to 26 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-282)
|
Shaw, Dan |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 07:49:52 -0400 |
74 lines |
Re: anime and manga
|
paulgoman |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:34:38 +0100 |
122 lines |
Re: Conferences
|
Alasdair King |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:22:34 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: anime and manga
|
Eric Willstaedt |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 05:28:56 EDT |
62 lines |
anime and manga
|
paulgoman |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:04:39 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: ANIME
|
Mirko Petric |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 11:02:37 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime minutia"
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 01:59:51 -0700 |
144 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 25 Aug 2005 to 26 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-282)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:20:01 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Paul Stambolis |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 16:04:13 +1000 |
163 lines |
Re: Hitchcock / Lang query "Originality"
|
Paul Stambolis |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:58:48 +1000 |
222 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
David Interlog |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:56:55 -0400 |
146 lines |
elementary query: "anime"
|
Jenna Ng |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:08:28 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Jim Flannery |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:14:00 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Joyes Burris |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:12:46 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:10:55 -0400 |
146 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:02:20 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Steven Budden |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:12:55 -0400 |
135 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 23 Aug 2005 to 25 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-279)
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 13:26:06 -0400 |
41 lines |
anime: aa-nee-may
|
David Surman |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 18:17:37 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Benjamin J Lim |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:31:01 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 23 Aug 2005 to 25 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-279)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 17:29:19 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
bill harris |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:15:56 -0500 |
178 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:53:09 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: feminism and deleuze
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:51:15 -0700 |
100 lines |
Re: who's out there
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:48:39 -0700 |
85 lines |
who's out there
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:15:07 -0400 |
78 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
David Interlog |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:05:30 -0400 |
134 lines |
Re: Hitchcock/Lang query
|
Ken Mogg |
Fri, 26 Aug 2005 00:58:17 +1000 |
49 lines |
Re: feminism and deleuze
|
Steven Budden |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:56:34 EDT |
53 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Steven Budden |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:54:49 EDT |
64 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 23 Aug 2005 to 25 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-279)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:40:03 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: feminism and deleuze
|
paulgoman |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:21:03 +0100 |
132 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
paulgoman |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:59:50 +0100 |
136 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:40:16 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Elly Friedman |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:18:03 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: elementary query: "anime"
|
Melis Behlil |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 15:55:25 +0300 |
112 lines |
elementary query: "anime"
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 08:44:11 -0400 |
76 lines |
feminism and deleuze
|
Veronica Tello |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 21:53:28 +1000 |
47 lines |
Re: Just joined
|
paulgoman |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:40:20 +0100 |
31 lines |
Hitchcock / Lang query
|
Henry Taylor |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:38:05 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Just joined
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 04:08:24 -0700 |
52 lines |
Just joined
|
paulgoman |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 11:01:12 +0100 |
61 lines |
Re: Perplexed
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 15:38:39 -0700 |
57 lines |
Perplexed
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 13:11:54 EDT |
53 lines |
Re: Help:Phd in Cinema studies
|
Deepa Nair |
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 19:44:24 +0530 |
25 lines |
Re: on Six Feet Under
|
Mark Little |
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:44:03 +0100 |
99 lines |
Re: Re-deleuze and hollywood
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 05:37:34 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: on Six Feet Under
|
Shaw, Dan |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 13:48:10 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re-video
|
Alan Fair |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 18:37:12 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: chromakey + cullberg
|
Haukur Már Helgason |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 16:25:06 +0000 |
115 lines |
Re: chromakey + cullberg
|
Anthony Richards |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 17:00:59 +0100 |
124 lines |
Re: chromakey + cullberg
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:41:22 -0700 |
90 lines |
AW: on Bereavement
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 15:37:39 +0200 |
29 lines |
Re: on Bereavement
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 06:13:35 -0700 |
84 lines |
Re: on Bereavement
|
Shaw, Dan |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 08:17:00 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Glen Fuller |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 09:28:27 +1000 |
72 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Anthony Richards |
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 00:26:53 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sun, 21 Aug 2005 18:54:41 -0400 |
50 lines |
Books on Bereavement
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sun, 21 Aug 2005 13:16:10 EDT |
54 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sun, 21 Aug 2005 12:00:59 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: Korean Cinema Specialists
|
Jia Jun |
Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:49:16 +0800 |
74 lines |
Re: Spam
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:10:59 -0700 |
71 lines |
Re: Spam
|
Henry Taylor |
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 23:08:57 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Spam
|
Jim Flannery |
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:57:25 -0700 |
37 lines |
Invitation to join H-Ideas (Intellectual History and History of Ideas)
|
Costica Bradatan |
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 18:46:17 +0000 |
92 lines |
Re: Spam
|
Henry Taylor |
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 19:26:32 +0100 |
73 lines |
Spam
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:05:14 EDT |
53 lines |
Backwoods Horror
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:01:43 EDT |
53 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Ross Macleay |
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 10:10:02 +1000 |
45 lines |
Re: Reply to Mikel
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:01:43 -0700 |
299 lines |
Re: Backwoods Horror
|
Maya McKechneay |
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 15:27:20 +0200 |
31 lines |
CFP--Imagining Iran: Symposium on Iranian Cinema (Sydney)
|
Michelle Langford |
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 12:48:21 +1000 |
90 lines |
Re: Leave Film philosophy
|
Jason Ulane |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:17:34 -0500 |
128 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 14 Aug 2005 to 15 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-270)
|
Maria H. Spector |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:52:51 +0100 |
991 lines |
Reply to Mikel
|
bill harris |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:44:16 -0500 |
386 lines |
Re: Leave Film philosophy
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:32:42 -0700 |
102 lines |
Re: Leave Film philosophy
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:32:37 -0700 |
100 lines |
Re: Leave Film philosophy
|
Ivany Bergamo |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 11:41:57 -0300 |
54 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Henry Taylor |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 14:12:27 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 13 Aug 2005 to 14 Aug 2005 (#2005-269)
|
Alan Fair |
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:17:13 +0100 |
43 lines |
nonlinear narrative
|
Buckland, Warren |
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 18:15:13 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Henry Taylor |
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:09:05 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Henry Taylor |
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 22:01:55 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Julia.Rice |
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:38:04 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: Books on Bereavement
|
Henry Taylor |
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:15:19 +0100 |
78 lines |
Re: Leave Film philosophy
|
WmmvrrvrrmmrrvrrvmmW |
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 14:24:50 +0100 |
29 lines |
Books on Bereavement
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 07:34:31 EDT |
57 lines |
Re: Leave Film philosophy
|
Mary Fox |
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 12:30:39 +0100 |
18 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 23:23:30 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Peter Caws |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:33:45 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
bill harris |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:10:40 -0500 |
364 lines |
non-linear narrative
|
Buckland, Warren |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:17:39 -0700 |
50 lines |
Leave Film philosophy
|
<> |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 17:41:03 +0200 |
21 lines |
Non-Linear Narratives
|
D. Martin-Jones |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:32:26 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Aug 2005 to 13 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-267)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:27:57 +0100 |
50 lines |
Re: Backwoods Horror
|
Julia.Rice |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 08:32:59 +0100 |
70 lines |
Re: Backwoods Horror
|
Daniel Reynolds |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:24:33 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Pulp Fiction
|
Pablo Marin |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:24:59 -0700 |
40 lines |
Pulp Fiction
|
Buckland, Warren |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:57:48 -0700 |
45 lines |
Re: Non-Linear Narratives
|
Steven Budden |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:33:32 EDT |
139 lines |
Re: Non-Linear Narratives
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:42:28 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: Non-Linear Narratives
|
Dave Beech |
Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:41:11 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: Backwoods Horror
|
Jim Flannery |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:32:09 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: Non-Linear Narratives
|
Steven Budden |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:05:21 -0400 |
240 lines |
Re: Non-Linear Narratives
|
Catalin Brylla |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 14:33:55 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: Non-Linear Narratives
|
Sarah Barmak |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:05:33 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Henry Taylor |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 18:20:09 +0100 |
87 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Steven Budden |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:37:04 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-265)
|
<> |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 12:29:38 EDT |
60 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 11 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-263)
|
Alan Fair |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 17:26:45 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Backwoods Horror
|
Eric Willstaedt |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 11:08:47 EDT |
60 lines |
Backwoods Horror
|
Richard Armstrong |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:53:57 EDT |
68 lines |
Re: The Mystery of the Leaping Fish
|
Shaw, Dan |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 10:13:00 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:48:31 -0400 |
81 lines |
The Mystery of the Leaping Fish
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 15:38:05 +0200 |
82 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Ron |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:06:33 -0400 |
166 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
Eric Willstaedt |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:51:46 EDT |
60 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
bill harris |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:57:17 -0500 |
195 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Steven Budden |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:31:10 EDT |
107 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Steven Budden |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 01:25:31 EDT |
50 lines |
Re: Non-Linear Narratives
|
Rob Luzecky |
Fri, 12 Aug 2005 00:44:20 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Catalin Brylla |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:04:30 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
Rob Luzecky |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 23:55:59 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:59:41 -0400 |
55 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:58:00 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: non-linear narrative
|
Steven Budden |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 17:28:41 -0400 |
134 lines |
non-linear narrative
|
Buckland, Warren |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:15:57 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: Non-Linear Narratives
|
Sarah Barmak |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 14:00:12 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: Kurt Kren
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:38:22 +0100 |
43 lines |
Kurt Kren
|
Daniel Barnett |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 13:22:52 EDT |
54 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Sue Matheson |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:50:24 -0600 |
366 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Steven Budden |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 12:41:09 -0400 |
284 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Catalin Brylla |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:57:29 -0700 |
104 lines |
Streamlining the Salon
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 16:37:50 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
bill harris |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 10:30:37 -0500 |
164 lines |
Clockwork Orange as unsexy
|
Greg Little |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:32:47 -0700 |
48 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Jenna Ng |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 06:57:06 -0700 |
62 lines |
Re: Clockwork Orange as unsexy
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 07:21:43 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Eyes Wide Shut orgy scene
|
bill harris |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:28:10 -0500 |
397 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 Aug 2005 to 10 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-258)
|
bill harris |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:37:01 -0500 |
193 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 Aug 2005 to 10 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-258)
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 19:15:40 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Aug 2005 (#2005-261)
|
Glynis Neslen |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 18:45:30 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Steven Budden |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:40:09 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Steven Budden |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:30:21 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:22:05 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
Therese Grisham |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:16:12 -0500 |
47 lines |
Hitchcock and Antonioni; (sado)masochism
|
Ken Mogg |
Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:11:32 +1000 |
33 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:10:15 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:46:37 +0000 |
32 lines |
Non Linear Narratives
|
david tetzlaff |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:29:15 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:23:23 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Melis Behlil |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 17:54:39 +0300 |
80 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:28:33 -0400 |
75 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:20:39 +0100 |
166 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Catalin Brylla |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 05:35:56 -0700 |
145 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 Aug 2005 to 10 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-258)
|
Griffin, Ruth |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:26:38 +0100 |
943 lines |
Re-Mapping Deleuze-A One Day Conference
|
Anna Powell |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:28:17 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 10:09:31 +0100 |
81 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Helen Tragea |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:51:00 -0700 |
49 lines |
Non Linear Narratives
|
D. Martin-Jones |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:31:44 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
PATRICK-FFRENCH |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 08:22:36 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Ross Macleay |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:36:51 +1000 |
201 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
bill harris |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:01:38 -0500 |
217 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:45:45 -0400 |
84 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Catalin Brylla |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 19:19:09 -0700 |
127 lines |
Re: History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 22:09:51 -0400 |
94 lines |
History of Non Linear Film Narrative?
|
Ross Macleay |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 11:52:23 +1000 |
59 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Arturas Bumsteinas |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:08:27 -0000 |
27 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Jim Flannery |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 18:02:27 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Stian Rødven Eide |
Wed, 10 Aug 2005 01:10:32 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: Non Linear Narratives
|
Catalin Brylla |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:57:26 -0700 |
59 lines |
Non Linear Narratives
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 21:52:56 +0000 |
22 lines |
Masochism & Film
|
Pierre-Emmanuel FINZI |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 20:02:26 -0000 |
30 lines |
Re: inference and etiquette
|
michael benton |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:41:58 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: Petrol stations and motorway service stations in cinema
|
Lee Parpart |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:06:32 -0400 |
20 lines |
inference and etiquette
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 12:17:59 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Masochism & Film
|
bill harris |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:17:47 -0500 |
216 lines |
Re: Masochism & Film
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:36:02 -0500 |
59 lines |
Re: Senses of Cinema web site
|
bill harris |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:34:28 -0500 |
166 lines |
Re: Spam
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 15:20:51 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Masochism & Film
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:38:02 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Senses of Cinema web site
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:35:39 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Masochism & Film
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:27:49 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Eyes Wide Shut orgy scene
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:11:29 -0500 |
78 lines |
Fwd: Spam
|
Richard Armstrong |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:03:22 EDT |
120 lines |
Re: Spam
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:43:31 +0100 |
30 lines |
Spam
|
Richard Armstrong |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 05:01:46 EDT |
56 lines |
Re: Sham
|
Rob Luzecky |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 06:12:23 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Eyes Wide Shut orgy scene
|
bill harris |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 01:11:33 -0500 |
373 lines |
Re: Help:Phd in Cinema studies
|
aylin gurses |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 06:01:23 +0000 |
80 lines |
Re: Sham
|
Glen Fuller |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:26:28 +1000 |
93 lines |
Re: Spam
|
Therese Grisham |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:56:26 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Spam, too
|
Therese Grisham |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:55:01 -0500 |
391 lines |
Re: Spam
|
abenedikt |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:20:51 -0300 |
106 lines |
Re: Spam, too
|
abenedikt |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 21:18:39 -0300 |
122 lines |
Re: Petrol stations and motorway service stations in cinema
|
Ben Gook |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:07:44 +1000 |
72 lines |
Spam
|
Andrew Court |
Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:06:42 +1000 |
23 lines |
Re: Spam, too
|
adriana benedikt |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:52:26 -0300 |
265 lines |
Re: Re Recent exchange about Failed Sexiness + Commodification = Eyes Wide Shut
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:24:41 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re Pop Culture bibliography
|
David Brottman |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:26:52 -0700 |
47 lines |
Gas Stations
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:45:19 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Help:Phd in Cinema studies
|
indra karan |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:38:42 -0700 |
63 lines |
Raymond Williams References
|
michael benton |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:25:48 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: Popular Culture Definition
|
michael benton |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:24:06 -0500 |
80 lines |
Re: Spam
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:20:30 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Petrol stations, et al.
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 20:18:33 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: Spam, too
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:05:06 -0400 |
102 lines |
Re: Help:Phd in Cinema studies
|
Steven Budden |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 15:04:06 -0400 |
141 lines |
Re: Masochism & Film
|
bill harris |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:54:45 -0500 |
221 lines |
Spam, too
|
David Brottman |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:15:13 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: Eyes Wide Shut orgy scene
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:12:55 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re Recent exchange about Failed Sexiness + Commodification = Eyes Wide Shut
|
David Brottman |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:57:42 -0700 |
98 lines |
Re: Eyes Wide Shut orgy scene
|
bill harris |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:43:31 -0500 |
364 lines |
Help:Phd in Cinema studies
|
Deepa Nair |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 22:57:51 +0530 |
32 lines |
Spam
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:27:44 EDT |
54 lines |
Popular Culture Definition
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:25:21 EDT |
71 lines |
Gabriele Salvatores
|
Therese Grisham |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:09:02 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Petrol stations, et al.
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:54:54 -0400 |
24 lines |
Petrol stations and motorway service stations in cinema
|
Catherine Wheatley |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:40:10 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Popular Culture Definition
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:35:08 -0500 |
37 lines |
Re: Petrol stations, et al.
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 17:26:45 +0100 |
47 lines |
Petrol stations, et al.
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 16:23:17 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 7 Aug 2005 to 8 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-251)
|
Jason Rovito |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:20:41 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 7 Aug 2005 to 8 Aug 2005 - Special issue (#2005-251)
|
Daniel Reynolds |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 11:17:34 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Popular Culture Definition
|
michael benton |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:01:53 -0500 |
85 lines |
Popular Culture Definition
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 10:15:44 EDT |
70 lines |
Re: Petrol stations and motorway service stations in cinema
|
Jesper Moldaschl |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:13:12 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: Eyes Wide Shut orgy scene
|
Shaw, Dan |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 09:10:01 -0400 |
63 lines |
Re: Petrol stations and motorway service stations in cinema
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 14:07:41 +0100 |
56 lines |
Journal Issue - Janus Head (Summer 2005)
|
Costica Bradatan |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:49:32 +0000 |
97 lines |
Petrol stations and motorway service stations in cinema
|
Benjamin McCann |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 13:01:38 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Masochism & Film
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 06:31:36 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: Masochism & Film
|
bill harris |
Mon, 8 Aug 2005 02:08:20 -0500 |
238 lines |
Re: Masochism & Film
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 14:22:59 -0400 |
55 lines |
Masochism & Film
|
David Brottman |
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 09:17:11 -0700 |
21 lines |
Gabriele Salvatores
|
Therese Grisham |
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 16:14:00 +0100 |
18 lines |
Maschoism
|
Rob Luzecky |
Sun, 7 Aug 2005 10:28:15 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Aug 2005 to 6 Aug 2005 (#2005-249)
|
Jason Rovito |
Sat, 6 Aug 2005 22:01:46 -0400 |
27 lines |
Pli -- Deleuze and Aesthetics
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 6 Aug 2005 19:05:47 +0100 |
74 lines |
"Cruise (not Cruz!)"
|
David Brottman |
Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:23:35 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 3 Aug 2005 to 4 Aug 2005 (#2005-247)
|
<> |
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 13:31:37 EDT |
60 lines |
CFP: Love and Cinema
|
francesca liguoro |
Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:18:17 +0200 |
210 lines |
John Gwynn/Boston/FNS/Concentra is out of the office.
|
John Gwynn |
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:48:27 -0400 |
28 lines |
new blog for internet movies
|
doron |
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 15:33:55 -0400 |
24 lines |
Eyes Wide Shut orgy
|
David Brottman |
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 10:37:50 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Is the orgy scene in Eyes Wide Shut Pretentious?
|
Steven Budden |
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 12:39:41 -0400 |
214 lines |
Is the orgy scene in Eyes Wide Shut Pretentious?
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 08:27:37 -0400 |
67 lines |
cfp: gender and east asian cinema
|
nicki lee |
Wed, 3 Aug 2005 00:22:24 +0100 |
94 lines |
Re: Pretentious?
|
bill harris |
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:09:02 -0500 |
183 lines |
Hubert Damisch
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 21:57:29 +0100 |
40 lines |
video and electronic art in Peru
|
Realidad Visual |
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 13:19:43 -0500 |
21 lines |
chromakey + cullberg
|
Barbara Keating |
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:37:11 +0100 |
39 lines |
CFP: Engaging Baudrillard (Swansea, UK)
|
No Name |
Tue, 2 Aug 2005 11:53:59 +0100 |
143 lines |
Celebrity Culture conference - early bird deadline approaching
|
Andy Miah |
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:17:59 +0100 |
124 lines |
Re: 9.43 Dowd's Reply to Hainge
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 1 Aug 2005 01:06:57 +0100 |
23 lines |
Books on Criticism
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:07:37 EDT |
62 lines |
9.43 Dowd's Reply to Hainge
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 30 Jul 2005 04:14:34 +0100 |
117 lines |
A book on Criticism as Literature/as Institutionalized Project
|
David Brottman |
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 10:19:02 -0700 |
33 lines |
Screening the past issue 18 now online
|
Peter Hughes |
Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:36:18 +1000 |
175 lines |
Books on Film Criticism
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 15:07:47 EDT |
68 lines |
Migrains-headaches
|
Warwick Mules |
Thu, 28 Jul 2005 08:26:06 +1000 |
33 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 26 Jul 2005 to 27 Jul 2005 (#2005-239)
|
Maria H. Spector |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 18:50:37 +0100 |
197 lines |
Re: Mikail Bakhtin
|
Therese Grisham |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 12:10:13 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Mikhail Bakhtin
|
Peter Hughes |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:04:43 +1000 |
56 lines |
Mikhail Bakhtin
|
carl sykes |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:47:59 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: Migraines-headache
|
Ange Tack |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 09:09:43 +0100 |
39 lines |
migraines-headaches
|
Tessa Dwyer |
Wed, 27 Jul 2005 16:03:23 +1000 |
19 lines |
Re: Books on Film Criticism
|
Zoltan Dragon |
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:32:21 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: migraines-headaches
|
Jim Flannery |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 22:08:38 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: migraines-headaches
|
Therese Grisham |
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 04:38:06 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: CFP - Experimental Histories in the Arts
|
Tara Forrest |
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:31:58 +1000 |
93 lines |
Migraines, Headaches again
|
Thomas Cohen |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:53:03 -0500 |
1329 lines |
Migraines, Headaches
|
Thomas Cohen |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:42:29 -0500 |
891 lines |
Headaches - and Hitchcock
|
Ken Mogg |
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:31:59 +1000 |
38 lines |
headaches-migraines
|
Jane |
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:59:42 +1000 |
69 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 25 Jul 2005 - Special issue (#2005-235)
|
Carlmelo Booc |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 13:35:25 -0700 |
243 lines |
Re: migraines-headaches
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:10:37 +0100 |
53 lines |
Two reminders
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 21:00:36 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: migraines-headaches
|
daniel herbert |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:39:26 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 24 Jul 2005 to 25 Jul 2005 (#2005-234)
|
Maria H. Spector |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:23:52 +0100 |
521 lines |
Migraines, Headaches
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 15:09:59 EDT |
53 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 24 Jul 2005 to 25 Jul 2005 (#2005-234)
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:53:56 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 24 Jul 2005 to 25 Jul 2005 (#2005-234)
|
Alan Fair |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:08:20 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: R: migraines-headaches
|
Eric Willstaedt |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:15:52 EDT |
64 lines |
R: migraines-headaches
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:31:01 +0200 |
49 lines |
R: migraines-headaches
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 16:27:29 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: migraines-headaches
|
Ben Gook |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:17:44 +1000 |
143 lines |
Re: migraines-headaches
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 05:27:52 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: migraines-headaches
|
Rob Luzecky |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 09:11:17 +0000 |
20 lines |
migraines-headaches
|
Maria H. Spector |
Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:09:11 +0100 |
25 lines |
Humorous deadly images
|
Visual-Media |
Sun, 24 Jul 2005 23:51:49 +0200 |
38 lines |
Two updates on Early Visual Media
|
Visual-Media |
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 23:52:39 +0200 |
33 lines |
9.42 Vanderschelden on Carax/Daly-Dowd
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 20:26:44 +0100 |
332 lines |
9.41 Hainge on Carax/Daly-Dowd
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 23 Jul 2005 15:12:12 +0100 |
234 lines |
Re: Prices-Re-Mapping Deleuze Conference-Urgent Notice!
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:49:59 -0700 |
56 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 20 Jul 2005 to 21 Jul 2005 (#2005-230)
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:15:53 EDT |
68 lines |
books on film criticism
|
Melissa Gronlund |
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:05:18 -0700 |
33 lines |
Call for papers-Marguerite Duras and Cinema
|
Phil Powrie |
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 15:09:23 +0100 |
229 lines |
Film Criticism Courses
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 09:32:17 EDT |
74 lines |
Re: Books on Film Criticism
|
Joyes Burris |
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 00:01:43 -0700 |
61 lines |
Re: Books on Film Criticism
|
Jason Ulane |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:16:14 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Books on Film Criticism
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:37:51 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Books on Film Criticism
|
Pablo Marin |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:06:57 -0700 |
117 lines |
Re: Books on Film Criticism
|
charles |
Thu, 21 Jul 2005 01:01:59 +0800 |
57 lines |
R: children in film
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 18:45:24 +0200 |
64 lines |
Books on Film Criticism
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 10:42:35 EDT |
81 lines |
Prices-Re-Mapping Deleuze Conference-Urgent Notice!
|
Anna Powell |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:12:40 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Re-Mapping Deleuze-Manchester Day Conference September 17 Notice
|
Isabelle Vanderschelden |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 09:11:11 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: children in film
|
Patrick Crogan |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:44:50 +0930 |
42 lines |
AW: Freaks and Film
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 23:05:25 +0200 |
124 lines |
Re: Films and Freaks ,other
|
Rob Luzecky |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:24:35 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Jul 2005 to 18 Jul 2005 (#2005-227)
|
Rob Luzecky |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 20:18:55 +0000 |
24 lines |
SFC news
|
Phil Powrie |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:55:55 +0100 |
314 lines |
Re: children in film
|
christiaan cruz |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 17:57:17 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: children in film
|
Marty Norden |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 13:14:44 -0400 |
37 lines |
The Tilburg Rarekiek - Death and Humour in photography & Visual Media
|
Visual-Media |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 18:33:12 +0200 |
87 lines |
Re-Mapping Deleuze-Manchester Day Conference September 17 Notice
|
Anna Powell |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:40:32 +0100 |
28 lines |
children in film
|
sebastian pircher |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 15:47:22 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: Films and Freaks ,other
|
carl sykes |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 11:55:39 +0100 |
27 lines |
Films and Freaks ,other
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 12:47:41 +0200 |
51 lines |
R: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Jul 2005 to 18 Jul 2005 (#2005-227)
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:51:50 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 17 Jul 2005 to 18 Jul 2005 (#2005-227)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:26:08 +0100 |
26 lines |
Freaks and Film: Elephant Man
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 09:47:13 +0200 |
57 lines |
Freaks and Film
|
John Maguire |
Tue, 19 Jul 2005 01:18:15 +0000 |
30 lines |
terror
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:43:01 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 16 Jul 2005 to 17 Jul 2005 - Special issue (#2005-225)
|
Therese Grisham |
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:23:17 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 16 Jul 2005 to 17 Jul 2005 - Special issue (#2005-225)
|
Therese Grisham |
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:17:39 -0500 |
20 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 16 Jul 2005 to 17 Jul 2005 - Special issue (#2005-225)
|
michael mouracade |
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:38:09 -0500 |
119 lines |
disaster films/L.A.
|
sebastian pircher |
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:52:58 +0200 |
35 lines |
Freaks and Film
|
carl sykes |
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:56:57 +0100 |
75 lines |
cinema and cultural studies
|
Sobhi al-Zobaidi |
Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:20:00 +0300 |
22 lines |
Re: Mike Frank's aloneness and his plea
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:15:21 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: Mike Frank's aloneness and his plea
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:40:53 -0300 |
38 lines |
Re: Mike Frank's aloneness and his plea
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:10:49 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: Mike Frank's aloneness and his plea
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 19:21:05 -0300 |
52 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 16 Jul 2005 to 17 Jul 2005 - Special issue (#2005-225)
|
Mark L. Feinsod |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 13:25:34 -0400 |
77 lines |
Test
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:46:35 -0500 |
17 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 16 Jul 2005 to 17 Jul 2005 - Special issue (#2005-225)
|
Jason Rovito |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:30:18 -0400 |
28 lines |
9.40 Leutrat's Response
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 14:53:05 +0100 |
202 lines |
9.39 Shapiro on Resnais/Leutrat
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 12:41:52 +0100 |
466 lines |
Re: Mike Frank's aloneness and his plea
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 00:27:45 -0400 |
134 lines |
Re: cinema's futures
|
Andrew Court |
Sun, 17 Jul 2005 11:22:40 +1000 |
28 lines |
Re: cinema's futures
|
eduardomauro |
Sat, 16 Jul 2005 16:07:26 -0300 |
43 lines |
Mike Frank's aloneness and his plea
|
David Brottman |
Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:41:51 -0700 |
143 lines |
9.38 Celeste on Resnais
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 16 Jul 2005 18:10:10 +0100 |
716 lines |
Re: cinema's futures
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:37:37 -0700 |
145 lines |
Italian National Museum of Cinema
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Fri, 15 Jul 2005 13:07:50 +0200 |
136 lines |
intertitles
|
Daniel Barnett |
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:33:20 EDT |
45 lines |
Intertitles
|
Dave Clarke |
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 12:06:18 +0100 |
66 lines |
Thesis CFP: New Views on Film Philosophy
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 14 Jul 2005 00:17:41 +0100 |
68 lines |
CFPs: SCMS Caucus on Class
|
Terri Ginsberg |
Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:09:29 -0400 |
128 lines |
Do You Know The Hatchet Man?
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:36:59 -0400 |
50 lines |
Reminder - CFP - Philosophy and Film - Belfast
|
Barbara Gabriella Renzi |
Wed, 13 Jul 2005 16:31:40 +0100 |
42 lines |
DAUMENKINO: THE FLIPBOOK SHOW
|
Visual-Media |
Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:07:47 +0200 |
43 lines |
Bresson
|
gary gach |
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:17:58 -0700 |
29 lines |
9.37 Cunneen's Reply
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 11 Jul 2005 01:24:58 +0100 |
137 lines |
Re: Goalkeeper's fear of the penalty
|
Helen Hughes |
Sat, 9 Jul 2005 17:34:00 EDT |
47 lines |
R: may I offer ?-sorry
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Sat, 9 Jul 2005 19:11:43 +0200 |
264 lines |
9.36 Davis on Bresson/Cunneen
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:05:52 +0100 |
262 lines |
may I offer ?
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Sat, 9 Jul 2005 19:05:03 +0200 |
147 lines |
R: prensentation, hi to everybody
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 20:41:02 +0200 |
113 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 6 Jul 2005 to 7 Jul 2005 (#2005-214)
|
Seth Gwinn |
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 14:30:54 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: prensentation, hi to everybody
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:29:15 -0700 |
90 lines |
A TERRA QUE FALTA
|
Hudson Moura |
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:41:01 -0700 |
176 lines |
cinema and Lacan
|
Francesca Liguoro |
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 05:17:51 -0600 |
26 lines |
ok and OT
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:57:01 +0200 |
55 lines |
european pycoanalisys film festival 2005, London
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Thu, 7 Jul 2005 09:57:01 +0200 |
205 lines |
Re: prensentation, hi to everybody
|
Richard Cohen Films |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 16:02:35 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Jul 2005 to 6 Jul 2005 (#2005-213)
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 23:33:35 +0100 |
32 lines |
Peter Wollen on North by Northwest
|
Henry Taylor |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 22:35:13 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Jul 2005 to 6 Jul 2005 (#2005-213)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 19:23:29 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re psychiatry & cinema
|
David Brottman |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 11:04:35 -0700 |
76 lines |
thanks to everybody
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 18:12:00 +0200 |
47 lines |
Re: prensentation, hi to everybody
|
Henry Taylor |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 15:30:22 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: prensentation, hi to everybody
|
michael benton |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 01:43:07 -0500 |
77 lines |
Re: prensentation, hi to everybody
|
Henry Taylor |
Wed, 6 Jul 2005 06:38:58 +0100 |
39 lines |
prensentation, hi to everybody
|
Luigi Starace, medical student on going psychiatric, |
Tue, 5 Jul 2005 22:46:14 +0200 |
42 lines |
Film-Philosophy July 2005: Bresson, Resnais, Carax
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 5 Jul 2005 19:14:58 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: allegory of the cave with Orson Welles
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:17:36 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: bergman film?
|
Juan Antonio |
Tue, 5 Jul 2005 11:24:41 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: bergman film?
|
WING-FAI LEUNG |
Tue, 5 Jul 2005 03:27:57 +0000 |
23 lines |
allegory of the cave with Orson Welles
|
Nathan Andersen |
Mon, 4 Jul 2005 13:42:11 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY ontology of film
|
Alan Fair |
Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:31:20 +0100 |
41 lines |
John Gwynn/Boston/FNS/Concentra is out of the office.
|
John Gwynn |
Mon, 4 Jul 2005 01:01:20 -0400 |
28 lines |
Why am I getting automatic challenges from [log in to unmask]
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:40:20 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Dogme 95, emotions and ethics
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 09:30:20 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Dogme 95, emotions and ethics
|
nicole brenez |
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 16:11:35 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: Dogme 95, emotions and ethics
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 08:51:54 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Dogme 95, emotions and ethics
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 04:52:16 -0300 |
50 lines |
ONTOLOGY OF CINEMATOGRAPHY" REFLECTIONS ON CINEMA"
|
; Rajaindrakaran. |
Sun, 3 Jul 2005 00:41:01 +0100 |
231 lines |
Dogme 95, emotions and ethics
|
Maria Antonia Velez Serna |
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 16:15:21 -0500 |
28 lines |
Cherchez la Femme Conference 2-3 Sept 05
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Sat, 2 Jul 2005 00:02:37 +0100 |
98 lines |
Re: Pretentious?
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 1 Jul 2005 02:22:03 -0300 |
23 lines |
Re: Pretentious?
|
Jenna Pei-Suin Ng |
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 17:32:43 -0700 |
108 lines |
Mike Frank/Faculty/Bentley is out of the office.
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:04:38 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Heidegger
|
Ben Gook |
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:22:49 +1000 |
58 lines |
9.35 Keller on Dundjerovic/Lepage
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 30 Jun 2005 01:15:16 +0100 |
554 lines |
Re: Pretentious?
|
eduardomauro |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:57:00 -0300 |
31 lines |
Re: Heidegger
|
Helen Hughes |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:30:54 EDT |
46 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 29 Jun 2005 (#2005-206)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:12:15 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 28 Jun 2005 to 29 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-204)
|
Dave Beech |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 16:56:09 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 29 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-205)
|
Luke Robinson |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 23:50:36 +0800 |
33 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 28 Jun 2005 to 29 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-204)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:58:02 +0100 |
28 lines |
Last Call for Submissions to Film and Philosophyi
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:21:30 -0400 |
36 lines |
Salon Netiquette
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:05:19 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Matthew H. Bernstein |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 10:03:14 -0400 |
89 lines |
Re: Pretentious?
|
e |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:21:23 -0500 |
500 lines |
Re: Pretentious?
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 08:15:28 -0400 |
46 lines |
Re: Pretentious?
|
Ben Gook |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 21:58:28 +1000 |
146 lines |
Re: Pretentious?
|
e |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:32:49 -0500 |
209 lines |
Re: AHA!! . . . there's the flux!
|
eduardomauro |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:58:17 -0300 |
64 lines |
Pretentious?
|
Ben Gook |
Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:14:28 +1000 |
80 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 28 Jun 2005 (#2005-203)
|
Dave Beech |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:18:10 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: AHA!! . . . there's the flux!
|
Nina Costanza |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:01:56 EDT |
52 lines |
Re: AHA!! . . . there's the flux!
|
eduardomauro |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 17:32:06 -0300 |
124 lines |
Re: "The author's line of thought"; "film flow"; "respect for riches"
|
Daniel Barnett |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:01:16 EDT |
70 lines |
politeness and boredom
|
Daniel Barnett |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:01:13 EDT |
104 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 27 Jun 2005 to 28 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-202)
|
Elizabeth Lathrop |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:51:46 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 28 Jun 2005 (#2005-203)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 20:35:29 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 27 Jun 2005 to 28 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-202)
|
Alan Fair |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 19:10:58 +0100 |
45 lines |
Questionnaire on the image and role of the librarian
|
A Sarkanen |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:42:09 +0100 |
85 lines |
Re: politeness and boredom
|
Dave Beech |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 10:41:56 +0100 |
173 lines |
Re: politeness and boredom
|
Helen Hughes |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 04:38:21 EDT |
135 lines |
Culture, Theory and Critique. TOC 46.1: "Noise". CFP (2).
|
Greg Hainge |
Tue, 28 Jun 2005 16:34:36 +1000 |
837 lines |
Re "The author's line of thought"; "film flow"; "respect for riches"
|
David Brottman |
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 14:02:41 -0700 |
105 lines |
"The author's line of thought"; "film flow"; "respect for riches"
|
David Brottman |
Mon, 27 Jun 2005 13:42:20 -0700 |
103 lines |
Re: Subject: Re: cinema's futures
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 21:37:02 -0400 |
29 lines |
Subject: Re: cinema's futures
|
Daniel Barnett |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:47:32 EDT |
136 lines |
Re: Boredom babies children and films
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:47:11 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Boredom babies children and films
|
Helen Hughes |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 18:18:54 EDT |
69 lines |
AHA!! . . . here's the crux
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 12:13:03 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: boredom
|
anke zechner |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 15:57:17 +0200 |
29 lines |
Re: cinema's futures
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 09:51:52 -0400 |
173 lines |
Re: cinema's futures
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Sun, 26 Jun 2005 13:39:56 +0100 |
80 lines |
Re: Barthes
|
eduardomauro |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 18:47:11 -0300 |
29 lines |
boredom
|
timothy murray |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:12:45 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Boredom
|
Dave Beech |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:14:52 +0100 |
41 lines |
Barthes
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 10:38:51 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: boredom
|
D J Morrey |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 13:57:36 +0100 |
36 lines |
Re: Deleuze and Boredom
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 09:21:15 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: boredom again
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 25 Jun 2005 08:43:31 +0100 |
42 lines |
Boredom
|
Elizabeth Lathrop |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:58:40 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: boredom again
|
Joan Guenther |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 20:58:20 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: boredom again
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:59:48 -0400 |
69 lines |
Re: boredom again
|
Helen Hughes |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:58:07 EDT |
55 lines |
Re: boredom again
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:21:52 -0400 |
80 lines |
boredom again
|
Glen Norton |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:06:46 -0400 |
31 lines |
Deleuze and Boredom
|
Glen Norton |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:57:43 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: cinema's futures
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 16:24:19 -0400 |
202 lines |
Re: cinema's futures
|
Shaw, Dan |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 15:59:53 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: cinema's futures
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:25:12 -0400 |
76 lines |
cinema's futures
|
Daniel Barnett |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:59:56 EDT |
131 lines |
boredom cont.
|
Glen Norton |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:57:27 -0400 |
26 lines |
>Subject: bordeom in film
|
CAROLINE WARD |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 18:51:17 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Greg Little |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:42:14 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Heidegger/boredom
|
Paul Melia |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 17:55:18 +0100 |
40 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 23 Jun 2005 to 24 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-196)
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 11:50:16 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Michael Szpakowski |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:22:15 -0700 |
47 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 23 Jun 2005 to 24 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-196)
|
Glen Norton |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:58:44 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 07:47:36 -0700 |
66 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Lee Parpart |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:52:27 -0400 |
127 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Michael Szpakowski |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:42:56 -0700 |
84 lines |
Re: boredom
|
Haukur Már Helgason |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:50:20 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: boredom
|
Alan Fair |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 13:37:45 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Henry Taylor |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:56:57 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 06:38:53 -0300 |
47 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Henry Taylor |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 10:30:05 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Michael Szpakowski |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 01:46:42 -0700 |
53 lines |
bordeom in film
|
Geoff King |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:34:30 +0100 |
34 lines |
Werner Herzog's Cinema: Between the Visionary and the Documentary
|
Silke Panse |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:04:35 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Paul Melia |
Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:24:12 +0100 |
73 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:22:34 -0700 |
37 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Paul Iannone |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:41:56 -0700 |
20 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Tony Jackson |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:40:16 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Rohesia Hamilton Metcalfe |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:35:26 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: Reply to Nicky Hamlin
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 22:11:22 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Helen Hughes |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:11:05 EDT |
57 lines |
Re: Antonioni and boredom
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:21:45 -0400 |
47 lines |
Antonioni and boredom
|
Glen Norton |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:18:44 -0400 |
67 lines |
Reply to Nicky Hamlin
|
Daniel Barnett |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:42:17 EDT |
170 lines |
9.34 Sinnerbrink on Lynch
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 16:51:00 +0100 |
670 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 19 Jun 2005 to 22 Jun 2005 (#2005-194)
|
Maria Antonia Velez Serna |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 08:24:12 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Helen Hughes |
Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:24:35 EDT |
76 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Cara O'Connor |
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:33:16 -0700 |
95 lines |
Re: Brain Draining in Hollywood?
|
Mikal Howard |
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 06:51:54 -0700 |
65 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Andrew Vartabedian |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 20:51:50 -0600 |
20 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Donna Frieze |
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 12:42:19 +1000 |
68 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Ben Gook |
Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:51:28 +1000 |
114 lines |
Re: 2. Writing in Film 3. Soft Cine ma respon se
|
Nicholas Hamlyn |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:39:02 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Henry Taylor |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 22:25:19 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:41:13 -0700 |
63 lines |
Re: Films that deal with genocide
|
Simon |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:17:37 +0100 |
56 lines |
Films that deal with genocide
|
Cara O'Connor |
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 13:01:12 -0700 |
33 lines |
9.33 Bleasdale on Malick
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 19 Jun 2005 13:59:45 +0100 |
308 lines |
brief reply to Pocock
|
Daniel Barnett |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 15:36:34 EDT |
139 lines |
Re: Brain Draining in Hollywood?
|
Nelson Zagalo |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 14:45:16 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: 2. Writing in Film 3. Soft Cine ma respon se
|
philip pocock |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 12:43:25 +0200 |
133 lines |
Re: WRITING ON FILM
|
Gilberto Porras |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 11:34:16 +0200 |
38 lines |
writing in film
|
Jim Flannery |
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 23:36:06 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Brain Draining in Hollywood?
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 07:07:20 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Brain Draining in Hollywood?
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 22:01:59 -0700 |
59 lines |
2. Writing in Film 3. Soft Cine ma response
|
Daniel Barnett |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:34:36 EDT |
184 lines |
Re: Brain Draining in Hollywood?
|
christiaan cruz |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 03:15:19 +0000 |
28 lines |
Brain Draining in Hollywood?
|
Ben Gook |
Sat, 18 Jun 2005 10:56:59 +1000 |
284 lines |
WRITING ON FILM
|
Robert Koehler |
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 12:18:24 -0700 |
36 lines |
Soft Cinema response
|
philip jackson pocock |
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 01:08:24 +0200 |
113 lines |
Re: Writing in Film
|
Sarah Barmak |
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 16:08:50 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 Jun 2005 to 10 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-180)
|
Elizabeth Nolan |
Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:36:22 -0700 |
23 lines |
Re: AW: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Helen Hughes |
Wed, 15 Jun 2005 17:40:01 EDT |
60 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Wed, 15 Jun 2005 07:29:03 -0400 |
267 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
julie@yahoo |
Wed, 15 Jun 2005 13:01:11 +1000 |
165 lines |
Soft Cinema DVD now available
|
Julie Talen |
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:55:00 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: Writing in Film
|
Tong, Janice |
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 16:24:12 +1000 |
215 lines |
Writing in film and the calligram
|
Warwick Mules |
Tue, 14 Jun 2005 09:20:56 +1000 |
58 lines |
9.32 del Rio on Antonioni
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:19:15 +0100 |
497 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:45:48 -0400 |
27 lines |
Soft Cinema DVD now available
|
Eduardo Navas |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:41:12 -0700 |
101 lines |
AW: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Greg Little |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 08:07:41 -0700 |
39 lines |
Re: Women/Writing
|
BklynMagus |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:06:14 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 11 Jun 2005 to 12 Jun 2005 (#2005-185)
|
Alan Fair |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:22:14 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: films which predict the future
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:32:00 +0100 |
69 lines |
Re: films which predict the future
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 07:31:43 +0100 |
72 lines |
Re: films which predict the future
|
Robert Keser |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 23:17:23 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: films which predict the future
|
Jim Flannery |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:55:37 -0700 |
46 lines |
Re: films which predict the future
|
Brian Charles Dauth |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:17:58 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: films which predict the future
|
Roy I.Gokay-Wol |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:32:37 -0700 |
72 lines |
Re: films which predict the future
|
Justine Toh |
Mon, 13 Jun 2005 10:25:24 +1000 |
33 lines |
Re: AW: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Enid Mabbott |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 20:42:40 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: AW: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Rob Luzecky |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:38:24 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: AW: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:54:23 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: AW: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 12:38:29 -0400 |
67 lines |
Re: AW: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 08:46:17 -0700 |
66 lines |
AW: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 17:08:34 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 07:29:12 -0700 |
42 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:38:59 -0400 |
104 lines |
Re: Bergman query
|
geska |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 15:01:56 +0200 |
89 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 to 11 Jun 2005 (#2005-184)
|
Alan Fair |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 10:56:51 +0100 |
47 lines |
Bergman query
|
Bill Marshall |
Sun, 12 Jun 2005 05:30:56 EDT |
47 lines |
Writing in film
|
John Maguire |
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:33:44 +0000 |
25 lines |
Writing in Films
|
Richard Armstrong |
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 15:06:41 EDT |
73 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Enid Mabbott |
Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:24:01 +0100 |
19 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-182)
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:07:25 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:32:09 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-182)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:48:44 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 Jun 2005 to 10 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-180)
|
Harriette Grissom |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:00:14 -0400 |
2614 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:48:22 -0500 |
30 lines |
Palestinian film, study
|
Sobhi al-Zobaidi |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 16:02:14 +0300 |
36 lines |
Re: Lynch goes digital
|
WmmvrrvrrmmrrvrrvmmW |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:48:18 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Cormac Deane |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:27:54 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Jim Flannery |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:49:24 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: Lynch goes digital
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 03:17:45 -0400 |
82 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Michelle Langford |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 15:39:52 +1000 |
30 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Rob Luzecky |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 04:05:37 +0000 |
36 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:42:04 -0700 |
97 lines |
Re: Lynch goes digital
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:40:04 -0700 |
184 lines |
Re: Writing in Films - experimental examples
|
Jane Simon |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:01:40 +1000 |
60 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Carl van der Walt |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 03:30:31 +0200 |
65 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Brian Charles Dauth |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:58:04 -0400 |
26 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Brian Charles Dauth |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 20:55:30 -0400 |
142 lines |
Writing in Films
|
Tessa Dwyer |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:24:20 +1000 |
24 lines |
Re: writing in films
|
Adrian Martin |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 10:11:39 +1000 |
36 lines |
Ant: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 Jun 2005 - Special issue (#2005-179)
|
Julian Hanich |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 01:52:01 +0200 |
1089 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Jim Flannery |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:38:37 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
<> |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:17:30 -0500 |
57 lines |
Re: Writing in films
|
WmmvrrvrrmmrrvrrvmmW |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:12:16 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Sarah Barmak |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 18:44:51 -0400 |
187 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Alfredo Martinez |
Fri, 10 Jun 2005 08:40:20 +1000 |
267 lines |
Writing in films
|
Dr Erica Sheen |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:50:11 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Thomas Deane Tucker |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:43:12 -0600 |
109 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:38:47 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
[log in to unmask] |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:29:46 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:03:20 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Enid Mabbott |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:01:59 +0100 |
68 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:53:07 -0400 |
81 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Sarah Barmak |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 16:41:27 -0400 |
187 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
joan carol urquhart |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:33:29 -0400 |
71 lines |
Re: Writing in Films
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:19:42 -0400 |
45 lines |
Writing in Films
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:11:59 EDT |
65 lines |
Writing in Films
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:10:05 EDT |
65 lines |
Lynch goes digital
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 9 Jun 2005 17:32:19 +0100 |
89 lines |
Woody Allen and Antonioni
|
Dan Garrett |
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 15:32:04 -0700 |
186 lines |
Naked Punch 4 (London 9 June)
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 01:18:22 +0100 |
89 lines |
Eisenstein's Early Drawings - Sketchbook 1914
|
Éric Legendre |
Mon, 6 Jun 2005 16:11:59 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Call for submissions
|
caterina abeni |
Sun, 5 Jun 2005 11:22:23 +0000 |
55 lines |
Re: Call for submissions
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 08:21:38 -0700 |
157 lines |
Call for submissions
|
emilie rowell |
Fri, 3 Jun 2005 15:31:53 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Don't overlook this film or this analysis
|
Kent Farmer |
Thu, 2 Jun 2005 09:57:24 +0100 |
30 lines |
Re: Films that jump right in
|
BklynMagus |
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 12:35:06 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: Films that jump right in
|
Henry Taylor |
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 17:24:16 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: Films that jump right in
|
Enid Mabbott |
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 15:27:25 +0100 |
20 lines |
faozan rizal restroprctive
|
rizal faozan |
Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:14:51 +0200 |
381 lines |
AVANT 2005. Karlstad, Sweden.
|
John Sundholm |
Tue, 31 May 2005 13:53:38 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Don't overlook this film or this analysis
|
J.T. Donovan |
Mon, 30 May 2005 15:42:19 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 28 May 2005 to 29 May 2005 (#2005-169)
|
Steven Elworth |
Sun, 29 May 2005 20:49:31 -0400 |
21 lines |
Film and Philosophy -CFP- Queen's University Belfast
|
Barbara Gabriella Renzi |
Sun, 29 May 2005 21:23:46 +0100 |
59 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 27 May 2005 to 28 May 2005 (#2005-168)
|
yehuda stav |
Sun, 29 May 2005 17:43:12 +0300 |
46 lines |
New Visual Technologies as Research Tools
|
Patrick Hazard |
Sun, 29 May 2005 11:31:51 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 27 May 2005 to 28 May 2005 (#2005-168)
|
M Jones |
Sat, 28 May 2005 16:34:03 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 27 May 2005 to 28 May 2005 (#2005-168)
|
Steven Elworth |
Sat, 28 May 2005 14:32:19 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: 50s madness
|
Adam Savje |
Fri, 27 May 2005 22:57:33 -0400 |
47 lines |
Chris Marker film screenings and talk (29 June)
|
Michael Witt |
Fri, 27 May 2005 18:27:00 +0100 |
436 lines |
50s madness
|
jmatturr |
Fri, 27 May 2005 08:29:56 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Films that jump right in
|
Doug vanderHoof |
Fri, 27 May 2005 06:27:35 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Films that jump right in
|
Adrian Martin |
Fri, 27 May 2005 18:57:37 +1000 |
51 lines |
9.31 Bould on Future Cinema
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 27 May 2005 02:06:25 +0100 |
431 lines |
stephanSE
|
stephanSE Linsenhoff |
Wed, 25 May 2005 20:12:24 +0200 |
91 lines |
Re: Don't overlook this film or this analysis
|
Kent Farmer |
Wed, 25 May 2005 15:40:18 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Don't overlook this film or this analysis
|
Robert Koehler |
Tue, 24 May 2005 11:20:03 -0700 |
41 lines |
Re: Don't overlook this film or this analysis
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Tue, 24 May 2005 07:20:46 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: Don't overlook this film or this analysis
|
Kent Farmer |
Tue, 24 May 2005 09:43:35 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Don't overlook this film or this analysis
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 23 May 2005 04:07:53 -0700 |
160 lines |
Don't overlook this film or this analysis
|
Kent Farmer |
Mon, 23 May 2005 11:46:08 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Ross Macleay |
Mon, 23 May 2005 09:02:44 +1000 |
39 lines |
9.30 Cubitt's Reply to Misek
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 22 May 2005 02:24:23 +0100 |
269 lines |
9.29 Misek on Cubitt's The Cinema Effect
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 21 May 2005 17:02:38 +0100 |
310 lines |
Death By Dollars: American Sensibility Has Art in A Chokehold
|
Kent Farmer |
Sat, 21 May 2005 00:47:52 -0700 |
144 lines |
jane campion
|
atil eylem atakav |
Fri, 20 May 2005 07:57:08 +0100 |
57 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium? (too much theory puts sands in our eyes)
|
eduardomauro |
Fri, 20 May 2005 00:23:56 -0300 |
40 lines |
Book Review, "Peace Knights of the Soul: Wisdom in 'Star Wars'" b y Jon Snodgrass, Reviewed by Arturo Torres
|
Snodgrass, Jon |
Thu, 19 May 2005 14:24:33 -0700 |
319 lines |
Germaine Dulac/Designs for Living
|
P P Powrie |
Wed, 18 May 2005 19:22:49 +0100 |
76 lines |
9.28 Kolisnyk on Bukatman/Matters of Gravity
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 18 May 2005 17:12:46 +0100 |
647 lines |
Re: Film as conservative medium
|
Enid Mabbott |
Wed, 18 May 2005 16:16:24 +0100 |
25 lines |
Early Popular Visual Culture
|
Thomas Weynants |
Wed, 18 May 2005 15:34:10 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: Film as conservative medium
|
Enid Mabbott |
Wed, 18 May 2005 14:10:34 +0100 |
27 lines |
New Issue of Politics and Culture
|
Imre Szeman |
Wed, 18 May 2005 09:06:11 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 18 May 2005 12:26:33 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 14 May 2005 to 15 May 2005 (#2005-152)
|
Geoff King |
Wed, 18 May 2005 09:44:04 +0100 |
59 lines |
2005.05.18 Film-Philosophy News
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 18 May 2005 00:36:38 +0100 |
897 lines |
Re: ownership
|
Stian Rødven Eide |
Wed, 18 May 2005 00:56:07 +0200 |
47 lines |
Film as conservative medium
|
Warwick Mules |
Wed, 18 May 2005 08:52:24 +1000 |
38 lines |
Re: ownership
|
Stian Rødven Eide |
Wed, 18 May 2005 00:38:52 +0200 |
198 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Dr Jason Jacobs |
Wed, 18 May 2005 06:49:36 +1000 |
208 lines |
Re: Kane Questions
|
Marty Norden |
Tue, 17 May 2005 14:17:38 -0400 |
46 lines |
Film is a conservative medium?
|
Daniel Barnett |
Tue, 17 May 2005 14:15:25 EDT |
74 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Ken Chen |
Tue, 17 May 2005 13:33:30 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: CITIZEN KANE
|
Anthony Richards |
Tue, 17 May 2005 17:54:43 +0100 |
100 lines |
CITIZEN KANE
|
Sergio Angelini |
Tue, 17 May 2005 17:47:09 +0100 |
69 lines |
Kane Questions
|
Tony Jackson |
Tue, 17 May 2005 12:06:06 -0400 |
106 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 17 May 2005 10:16:50 -0400 |
130 lines |
Re: film is a conservative medium
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 17 May 2005 06:09:41 -0400 |
32 lines |
Takashi Ito's Spacy
|
geska |
Tue, 17 May 2005 11:22:03 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Henry Taylor |
Tue, 17 May 2005 10:54:18 +0200 |
36 lines |
Re: Hey
|
yehuda stav |
Tue, 17 May 2005 11:35:34 +0300 |
58 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Sarah Barmak |
Tue, 17 May 2005 02:54:32 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Ross Macleay |
Tue, 17 May 2005 16:00:02 +1000 |
48 lines |
Re: film is a conservative medium
|
Sarah Barmak |
Mon, 16 May 2005 23:40:02 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: film is a conservative medium
|
Adrian Martin |
Tue, 17 May 2005 12:45:09 +1000 |
35 lines |
Re: Hey
|
Andrew Court |
Tue, 17 May 2005 11:23:49 +1000 |
38 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 16 May 2005 21:15:18 -0400 |
207 lines |
Re: Film is a conservative medium?
|
Lisa Purse |
Mon, 16 May 2005 23:59:50 +0100 |
138 lines |
9.27 Badt on Dixon/Visions of the Apocalypse
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 16 May 2005 23:42:00 +0100 |
296 lines |
9.26 Herbert on Dixon/Visions of the Apocalypse
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 16 May 2005 22:05:24 +0100 |
356 lines |
Dark/Thanatourism research forum
|
Ria Dunkley |
Mon, 16 May 2005 14:03:06 +0100 |
25 lines |
Hey
|
Henny Psari |
Sun, 15 May 2005 21:06:46 -0700 |
155 lines |
Re: Ten Years of Dogme 95: The Impact of Dogme 95 on American Cinema - Suggestions?
|
Paul Iannone |
Sun, 15 May 2005 16:20:17 -0700 |
21 lines |
FILM WEEKEND PROJECT -- ADVICE?
|
Jason Rovito |
Sun, 15 May 2005 17:38:51 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: ownership
|
Enid Mabbott |
Sun, 15 May 2005 21:50:06 +0100 |
199 lines |
CINEMA / POLITIQUE
|
nicole brenez |
Sun, 15 May 2005 16:10:23 +0200 |
55 lines |
CINEMA / POLITIQUE
|
nicole brenez |
Sun, 15 May 2005 16:05:27 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: The (subliminal) influence of Counter Culture on movies
|
Tessa Dwyer |
Sun, 15 May 2005 22:22:55 +1000 |
61 lines |
Ten Years of Dogme 95: The Impact of Dogme 95 on American Cinema - Suggestions?
|
Andreas Jahn-Sudmann |
Sat, 14 May 2005 18:53:10 +0100 |
35 lines |
9.25 Baldwin on The Matrix
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 14 May 2005 13:54:19 +0100 |
371 lines |
Re: The (subliminal) influence of Counter Culture on movies
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 14 May 2005 02:22:41 -0700 |
68 lines |
Re: The (subliminal) influence of Counter Culture on movies
|
christiaan cruz |
Sat, 14 May 2005 02:48:45 +0000 |
38 lines |
Re: The (subliminal) influence of Counter Culture on movies
|
Jim Flannery |
Fri, 13 May 2005 17:40:49 -0700 |
33 lines |
Re: The (subliminal) influence of Counter Culture on movies
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 13 May 2005 17:02:17 -0700 |
128 lines |
Film is a conservative medium?
|
Ken Chen |
Fri, 13 May 2005 18:35:46 -0400 |
32 lines |
Two cinema conferences
|
P P Powrie |
Fri, 13 May 2005 19:25:23 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: The (subliminal) influence of Counter Culture on movies
|
jmatturr |
Fri, 13 May 2005 14:12:26 -0400 |
51 lines |
InterCulture CFP: Evil Sisters
|
Nicholas Ruiz |
Fri, 13 May 2005 12:42:09 -0400 |
198 lines |
Re: ownership
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 13 May 2005 08:53:55 -0400 |
110 lines |
Re: ownership
|
Enid Mabbott |
Fri, 13 May 2005 12:04:07 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: The (subliminal) influence of Counter Culture on movies
|
Shaw, Dan |
Fri, 13 May 2005 06:12:53 -0400 |
31 lines |
Conversations with Joseph Losey by Michel Ciment, 1985
|
sue taylor |
Fri, 13 May 2005 09:03:53 +0000 |
18 lines |
The (subliminal) influence of Counter Culture on movies
|
Yurushi Love |
Fri, 13 May 2005 09:26:40 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: ownership
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 12 May 2005 15:14:52 -0400 |
41 lines |
ownership
|
Paul Taberham |
Thu, 12 May 2005 19:18:03 +0100 |
122 lines |
Re: DVDs, ownership/copyright
|
eduardomauro |
Wed, 11 May 2005 17:13:01 -0300 |
47 lines |
Re: DVDs, ownership/copyright
|
Henry Taylor |
Wed, 11 May 2005 21:45:54 +0200 |
27 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 11 May 2005 (#2005-148)
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 11 May 2005 19:37:21 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
Eye Scratch |
Wed, 11 May 2005 01:27:55 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 May 2005 to 10 May 2005 (#2005-146)
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 11 May 2005 03:53:28 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 May 2005 to 10 May 2005 (#2005-146)
|
Patrick Crogan |
Wed, 11 May 2005 10:15:36 +0930 |
48 lines |
sequence grabs (Mac and PC)
|
Nadine Boljkovac |
Wed, 11 May 2005 00:38:13 +0100 |
48 lines |
9.24 Dahm on Blanchet/Blockbuster
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 11 May 2005 00:34:51 +0100 |
230 lines |
Fwd: Korean Film symposium 20 May
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 10 May 2005 23:10:34 +0100 |
41 lines |
9.23 Sheppard on Blanchet/Blockbuster
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 10 May 2005 23:09:18 +0100 |
192 lines |
Self-reflexivity in film
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Tue, 10 May 2005 18:44:00 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: [Bulk] Re: frame grabs
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Tue, 10 May 2005 19:16:54 +0100 |
50 lines |
frame grabs
|
Lee Parpart |
Tue, 10 May 2005 14:15:58 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Frame grabs and sequence grabs
|
eduardomauro |
Tue, 10 May 2005 15:05:35 -0300 |
27 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
eduardomauro |
Tue, 10 May 2005 14:52:12 -0300 |
32 lines |
Contractually Limited Appointment, York Film & Video 2005-06
|
Michael Zryd |
Tue, 10 May 2005 13:35:27 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 9 May 2005 to 10 May 2005 (#2005-146)
|
Geoff King |
Tue, 10 May 2005 18:26:56 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: frame grabs - print screen
|
Randolph Jordan |
Tue, 10 May 2005 13:00:20 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: sequence grabs
|
Randolph Jordan |
Tue, 10 May 2005 09:54:55 -0400 |
122 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
geska |
Tue, 10 May 2005 14:26:03 +0200 |
74 lines |
Re: sequence grabs
|
Catalin Brylla |
Tue, 10 May 2005 04:49:05 -0700 |
93 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
Cormac Deane |
Tue, 10 May 2005 11:59:32 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
Stian Rødven Eide |
Tue, 10 May 2005 12:30:04 +0200 |
95 lines |
Frame grabs and sequence grabs
|
Henry Taylor |
Tue, 10 May 2005 11:40:52 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
eduardomauro |
Tue, 10 May 2005 00:22:32 -0300 |
28 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
David Collett |
Tue, 10 May 2005 09:16:10 +1000 |
45 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
eduardomauro |
Mon, 9 May 2005 19:58:20 -0300 |
19 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
David Collett |
Tue, 10 May 2005 08:45:18 +1000 |
29 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Mon, 9 May 2005 13:32:47 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: frame grabs
|
Randolph Jordan |
Mon, 9 May 2005 16:13:10 -0400 |
57 lines |
frame grabs
|
Lee Parpart |
Mon, 9 May 2005 15:44:56 -0400 |
31 lines |
Conference announcement: Engaging Baudrillard
|
Marcus Doel |
Mon, 9 May 2005 08:59:38 +0100 |
364 lines |
Film-Philosophy May 2005 Issue
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 8 May 2005 18:58:16 +0100 |
77 lines |
Takashi Miike
|
Pierre-Emmanuel FINZI |
Thu, 5 May 2005 17:26:09 -0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Postgrad Thesis- Japanese Cinema, Takashi Miike
|
Mary Fox |
Thu, 5 May 2005 13:00:25 +0000 |
21 lines |
African Film Symposium
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 5 May 2005 12:55:32 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: citation inquiry
|
geska |
Mon, 2 May 2005 16:04:00 +0200 |
64 lines |
citation inquiry
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 2 May 2005 09:55:16 -0400 |
58 lines |
Re: superhero fiction and the Deleuzian Legacy
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 2 May 2005 02:33:33 -0700 |
88 lines |
Re: American Horror of the 90s
|
Paul Iannone |
Sun, 1 May 2005 15:28:21 -0700 |
45 lines |
Review "Revenge of the Sith" Novel
|
Snodgrass, Jon |
Sun, 1 May 2005 14:43:33 -0700 |
452 lines |
automated response
|
Kristin , Full Frame |
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 13:00:23 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: Film Graduate Programs Canada
|
Deepa Nair |
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 20:16:16 +0530 |
62 lines |
Re: American Horror of the 90s
|
Patricia Molloy |
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 10:14:24 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: how to make an american quilt
|
Enid Mabbott |
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 14:54:14 +0100 |
128 lines |
[Scary] American Horror of the 90s?
|
Ross Macleay |
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 11:26:57 +1000 |
35 lines |
Re: American Horror of the 90s
|
Paul Iannone |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 16:39:12 -0700 |
71 lines |
how to make an american quilt
|
atil eylem atakav |
Sat, 30 Apr 2005 00:17:07 +0100 |
42 lines |
Re: Interval (1) Conference - call for submissions
|
Steven Eastwood |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:58:07 -0400 |
154 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 28 Apr 2005 to 29 Apr 2005 (#2005-139)
|
Robert Koehler |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:23:31 -0700 |
70 lines |
Re: American Horror of the 90s
|
Carl van der Walt |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 19:36:10 +0200 |
25 lines |
Re: Zorn's Lemma / 2
|
jmatturr |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 13:21:43 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: queer opera
|
wendy f hsu |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 12:59:10 -0400 |
23 lines |
Zorn's Lemma / 2
|
Paul Melia |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:26:48 +0100 |
44 lines |
Re: [Bulk] American Horror of the 90s
|
Paul |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 11:06:29 -0400 |
92 lines |
Re: [Bulk] American Horror of the 90s
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:51:34 +0100 |
83 lines |
Re: American Horror of the 90s
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:05:19 -0700 |
39 lines |
American Horror of the 90s
|
Julian Hanich |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:38:01 +0200 |
56 lines |
Re: queer opera
|
baris kilicbay |
Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:28:34 +0300 |
22 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 26 Apr 2005 to 27 Apr 2005 (#2005-137)
|
Jason Rovito |
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:17:18 -0400 |
31 lines |
Filmmaker Barbara Albert at Warwick Film and TV Conference
|
Anna Mullally |
Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:05:44 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Eros
|
Paul Gallagher |
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 20:41:45 -0400 |
54 lines |
Film Graduate Programs Canada
|
Michael Zryd |
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:34:09 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Film Graduate Programs Canada
|
Deepa Nair |
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 13:31:47 +0530 |
76 lines |
Re: Film Graduate Programs Canada
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 14:01:43 -0400 |
134 lines |
Canons and Feminism
|
Richard Armstrong |
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 13:12:54 EDT |
50 lines |
Re: Globalisation Theories and Global Economics of East Asia
|
Jia Jun |
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:50:41 +0800 |
86 lines |
Re: Film Graduate Programs Canada
|
Jia Jun |
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:00:34 +0800 |
75 lines |
Re: canons and feminism
|
martha rosler |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 23:58:24 -0400 |
115 lines |
Re: queer opera
|
Michelle Langford |
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:24:07 +1000 |
145 lines |
Re: queer opera
|
Rose Theresa |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 15:24:02 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: Eros
|
Adrian Martin |
Tue, 26 Apr 2005 03:11:06 +1000 |
37 lines |
queer opera
|
Nico |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:51:34 +0200 |
29 lines |
urban cinema or screening the city
|
!!! |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:34:39 +0300 |
32 lines |
Re: Eros
|
Tony Ervolino |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 06:58:53 +0100 |
125 lines |
Re: Eros
|
Paul Gallagher |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:51:34 -0400 |
95 lines |
European Film and Television/Women and Contemporary European Cinema: Special Issue of Studies in European Cinema
|
P P Powrie |
Sun, 24 Apr 2005 15:54:22 +0100 |
167 lines |
CFP: The Situated Body (A Special Issue of Janus Head)
|
Costica Bradatan |
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:15:21 +0000 |
392 lines |
phil arg in film
|
Daniel Barnett |
Sat, 23 Apr 2005 05:56:11 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: 8mm film projector to hire
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:51:29 +0100 |
30 lines |
Where can I get props?
|
CAROLINE WARD |
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:34:35 +0100 |
20 lines |
Re: Where can I get props?
|
Matthew H. Bernstein |
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:08:56 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Where can I get props?
|
lyndsay holland |
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:18:55 +0000 |
23 lines |
8mm film projector to hire
|
Melissa Gronlund |
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 09:54:39 -0700 |
51 lines |
Where can I get props?
|
Maria H. Spector |
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 17:02:02 +0100 |
23 lines |
Re: Zorn's Lemma (was philosophical argument in film)
|
jmatturr |
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 07:25:27 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Zorn's Lemma (was philosophical argument in film)
|
Paul Melia |
Fri, 22 Apr 2005 08:09:59 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Zorn's Lema (was philosophical argument in film)
|
Jim Flannery |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 16:33:16 -0700 |
33 lines |
CFPs Celebrity Culture - yikes what a scary email! Let's try again, a little briefer this time
|
Andy Miah |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:12:01 +0100 |
60 lines |
CFPs - Celebrity Culture
|
Andy Miah |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 18:02:06 +0100 |
298 lines |
Re: Zorn's Lema (was philosophical argument in film)
|
jmatturr |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:57:43 -0400 |
99 lines |
Zorn's Lema (was philosophical argument in film)
|
Paul Melia |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 11:59:51 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
jmatturr |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 04:37:32 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
Paul Melia |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 08:20:31 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
Tony Ervolino |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:29:58 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
Tony Ervolino |
Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:08:54 +0100 |
44 lines |
philosophical argument in film
|
CAROLINE WARD |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 19:17:29 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
bill harris |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:22:28 -0500 |
133 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
Sarah Barmak |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:36:18 -0400 |
36 lines |
Laura Mulvey's films
|
Philippe Meers |
Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:28:55 +0200 |
155 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
jmatturr |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:36:09 -0400 |
23 lines |
philosophical argument in film
|
Daniel Barnett |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 20:12:18 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
Enid Mabbott |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:13:38 +0100 |
55 lines |
"The Democratization of Cultural Criticism" - A H-Ideas Virtual Symposium
|
Costica Bradatan |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 17:45:16 +0000 |
92 lines |
Re: film art and installation
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:26:06 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 18 Apr 2005 to 19 Apr 2005 (#2005-129)
|
Maria H. Spector |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:16:07 +0100 |
51 lines |
film art and installations
|
Greg Little |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 07:07:46 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
michaelP |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 06:00:45 +0100 |
79 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
Rob Luzecky |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 02:24:59 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
Stehen Strother |
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:41:50 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: philosophical argument in film
|
<> |
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 21:11:06 EDT |
51 lines |
philosophical argument in film
|
Peter Caws |
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 20:44:19 -0400 |
18 lines |
9.22 Abecassis on Wilson
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 19 Apr 2005 01:00:12 +0100 |
275 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Eliseo Pico |
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:47:07 +0100 |
40 lines |
CFP: The Velvet Light Trap, issue 58
|
Billy Vermillion |
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:02:26 +0100 |
91 lines |
|
Jon Worlsey |
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 14:12:16 +0000 |
33 lines |
German Film Since The "Wende"
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 16 Apr 2005 15:35:38 +0100 |
115 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 14 Apr 2005 to 15 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#200...
|
Ross Macleay |
Sat, 16 Apr 2005 11:02:09 +1000 |
60 lines |
|
Greg Little |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 11:23:03 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: canons and feminism
|
bill harris |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:44:17 -0500 |
87 lines |
zen
|
gary gach |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:46:58 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: canons and feminism
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 07:07:26 -0400 |
95 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 14 Apr 2005 to 15 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#200...
|
Richard Armstrong |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 05:46:41 EDT |
50 lines |
Re: canons and feminism
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:13:57 -0700 |
79 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
atil eylem atakav |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:30:38 +0100 |
98 lines |
Re: meditation zen in the shot
|
rizal faozan |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 08:48:41 +0200 |
168 lines |
canons and feminism
|
Jane Simon |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 13:21:36 +1000 |
60 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
martha rosler |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 22:16:54 -0400 |
174 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
christiaan cruz |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:57:50 +0000 |
48 lines |
9.21 MacKinnon on The Trouble With Men
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 01:43:57 +0100 |
360 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:12:24 -0400 |
215 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
julie@yahoo |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:52:27 +1000 |
239 lines |
Gorris, Campion, Armstrong, ?
|
Ross Macleay |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 09:31:40 +1000 |
37 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Carl van der Walt |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 23:02:43 +0200 |
51 lines |
Salon Guide
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:23:13 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 14 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#2005-122)
|
Sandra Wamsley |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:04:32 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 14 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#2005-122)
|
Sandra Wamsley |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 11:02:30 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 14 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#2005-122)
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:55:39 EDT |
49 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
John Marmysz |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:54:19 EDT |
122 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Patricia Molloy |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:50:19 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 13 Apr 2005 to 14 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#2005-121)
|
bill harris |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:49:06 -0500 |
191 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:48:04 -0400 |
23 lines |
feminist films
|
Bergen-Aurand, Brian K |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:59:00 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 13 Apr 2005 to 14 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#2005-121)
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:07:45 -0400 |
47 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Peter Caws |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:06:25 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 13 Apr 2005 to 14 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#2005-121)
|
Chuck Kleinhans |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:47:25 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Mark Little |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 13:44:51 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:40:22 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Ilkka Levä |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:30:14 +0300 |
104 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 08:21:06 -0400 |
68 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Ilkka Levä |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 15:04:34 +0300 |
54 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:53:32 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 07:39:01 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 14 Apr 2005 06:35:19 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:07:44 -0700 |
55 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Shaw, Dan |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 21:35:28 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Joan Guenther |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:35:51 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
B. Pérez |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:12:02 +0100 |
66 lines |
Ozu the Engine
|
Paul Taberham |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 20:09:31 +0100 |
158 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
bill harris |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:24:55 -0500 |
189 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
bill harris |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:10:23 -0500 |
142 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
atil eylem atakav |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:06:38 +0100 |
49 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
bill harris |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:06:16 -0500 |
119 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:57:21 -0700 |
47 lines |
Feminist Films
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:14:02 EDT |
51 lines |
Heisenberg effect
|
Rob Ruzic |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:27:53 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: feminist films
|
B. Pérez |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 09:44:20 +0100 |
148 lines |
feminist films
|
atil eylem atakav |
Wed, 13 Apr 2005 07:49:16 +0100 |
133 lines |
zen
|
gary gach |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:27:41 -0700 |
47 lines |
New Review of Film and Television Studies
|
Buckland, Warren |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:40:36 -0700 |
89 lines |
Re: meditation zen in the shot
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:35:09 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: Eros
|
Tony Ervolino |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:31:44 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: meditation zen in the shot
|
Tony Ervolino |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:20:46 +0100 |
53 lines |
Re: Eros
|
Paul |
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:38:04 -0400 |
56 lines |
meditation zen in the shot
|
rizal faozan |
Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:35:18 +0200 |
60 lines |
9.20 Schellhammer on Early Cinema
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 10:28:23 +0100 |
376 lines |
Eros
|
Tony Ervolino |
Mon, 11 Apr 2005 01:40:58 +0100 |
35 lines |
9.19 Deutelbaum on Early Cinema
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 10 Apr 2005 23:04:25 +0100 |
289 lines |
Re: Hand-painted film
|
Adam Savje |
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 09:55:20 -0400 |
122 lines |
Re: Hand-painted film
|
<> |
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 08:42:10 EDT |
60 lines |
Re: Hand-painted film
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:37:58 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: Hand-painted film
|
Alexander Shumski |
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 06:37:55 -0400 |
34 lines |
Hand-painted film
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:26:15 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 7 Apr 2005 to 8 Apr 2005 (#2005-116)
|
Richard Armstrong |
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:49:42 EDT |
52 lines |
Barthes Quote-
|
wayneptr |
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 14:13:33 +0100 |
26 lines |
PASSWORD??????????
|
Alexander Klemm |
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 07:54:17 +0100 |
15 lines |
Cinema as a universal language
|
Tessa Dwyer |
Fri, 8 Apr 2005 09:50:23 +1000 |
24 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Apr 2005 to 6 Apr 2005 (#2005-114)
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:07:11 EDT |
55 lines |
Barthes Quote
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 13:04:45 EDT |
50 lines |
Critique of the Universal Human & Barthes
|
Ross Macleay |
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 09:53:00 +1000 |
24 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Apr 2005 - Special issue (#2005-113)
|
Leo Bersani |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:40:13 EDT |
21 lines |
Re: Barthes Quote
|
Martijn Boven |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:01:09 +0200 |
53 lines |
2005.03.05 Film-Philosophy News
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:14:03 +0100 |
1570 lines |
Call For Papers
|
Francesca Liguoro |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 04:25:30 -0600 |
120 lines |
Cinema as a universal language
|
Christian Katti |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 07:46:01 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: Cinema as a universal language
|
Jim Flannery |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:30:18 -0700 |
34 lines |
Cinema as a universal language
|
Tessa Dwyer |
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 11:01:55 +1000 |
28 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 1 Apr 2005 to 2 Apr 2005 (#2005-109)
|
<> |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:30:39 EDT |
53 lines |
Re: Barthes Quote
|
Helen westerik |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 19:44:04 +0200 |
45 lines |
Barthes Quote
|
Richard Armstrong |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 13:19:10 EDT |
60 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 1 Apr 2005 to 2 Apr 2005 (#2005-109)
|
toni matlock |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:59:25 -0600 |
399 lines |
Re: Cinema as a universal language
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:06:42 -0400 |
64 lines |
Re: universal language
|
jmatturr |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:31:01 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Cinema as a universal language
|
Nils Crompton |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:22:33 +1000 |
60 lines |
Re: Godard
|
Melissa Gronlund |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 05:38:50 -0700 |
53 lines |
Re: quick godard question
|
Anthony Richards |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:39:50 +0100 |
55 lines |
Re: cinema as a universal language
|
John Riley |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:35:56 +0100 |
56 lines |
Re: universal language
|
Nicky Hamlyn |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 08:04:28 +0100 |
51 lines |
Re: Cinema as a universal language
|
Adrian Martin |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:12:57 +1000 |
26 lines |
universal language
|
jane mills |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:41:51 +1000 |
29 lines |
Re: cinema as a universal language
|
Maurits Bartstra |
Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:21:20 +0000 |
21 lines |
Re: cinema as a universal language
|
Peter Caws |
Sat, 2 Apr 2005 22:23:20 -0500 |
18 lines |
cinema as a universal language
|
Tessa Dwyer |
Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:00:46 +1000 |
25 lines |
Godard
|
Richard Armstrong |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 13:44:16 EST |
57 lines |
Design and Cinema Conference Program
|
Ali Vatansever |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 21:17:34 +0300 |
225 lines |
Re: Actors'n'Inventors for dummies
|
<> |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:36:47 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Actors'n'Inventors
|
jmatturr |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:27:02 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: Actors'n'Inventors
|
<> |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:03:29 -0500 |
38 lines |
Actors'n'Inventors
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 16:50:38 +0200 |
34 lines |
quick godard question
|
Melissa Gronlund |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 02:26:10 -0800 |
36 lines |
Re: Turkish Cinema
|
Serkan Barut |
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 23:52:46 +0100 |
41 lines |
Re: Turkish Cinema
|
Savas Arslan |
Fri, 1 Apr 2005 01:17:39 +0300 |
122 lines |
Turkish Cinema
|
Esin PAÇA |
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 22:26:53 +0300 |
37 lines |
Durgnat
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:15:48 EST |
61 lines |
Re: Turkish Cinema
|
muratirpan |
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 13:04:36 +0300 |
70 lines |
Durgnat (on Franju)
|
Katherine Ince |
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 09:42:01 +0100 |
31 lines |
Durgnat
|
Ross Macleay |
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:05:25 +1000 |
31 lines |
Re: Turkish Cinema
|
Paul Gallagher |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:04:45 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: Durgnat
|
[log in to unmask] |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 11:44:18 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: Turkish Cinema
|
Arij Al-Soltan |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:27:17 +0000 |
54 lines |
9.18 Schneider on Everett/Davies
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 16:44:05 +0100 |
211 lines |
Re: questions about film and philosophy
|
Mike Ashcroft |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:06:08 +0000 |
68 lines |
Turkish Cinema
|
Bergen-Aurand, Brian K |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 08:15:39 -0600 |
38 lines |
Re: Durgnat
|
NICHOLAS HAMLYN |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:11:37 +0100 |
58 lines |
Re: Durgnat
|
Paul Gallagher |
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:24:28 -0500 |
40 lines |
Going to Glasgow Screen Conference??
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:22:53 -0500 |
90 lines |
Durgnat
|
Ross Macleay |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 10:03:39 +1000 |
27 lines |
FYI: Reviews of Hotel Rwanda, Notre Musique, and Merchant of Venice
|
Dan Garrett |
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 15:45:27 -0800 |
121 lines |
Re: texts to begin the study of film and philosophy
|
Thomas E. Wartenberg |
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 13:09:46 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: texts to begin the study of film and philosophy
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 06:12:06 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: questions about film and philosophy
|
Rob Luzecky |
Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:30:07 +0000 |
24 lines |
questions about film and philosophy
|
Molly McKellar |
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:21:34 -0700 |
37 lines |
FW: My Father and I
|
Yosefa Loshitzky |
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:43:06 +0100 |
480 lines |
9.17 Nowell-Smith's Response
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:01:37 +0000 |
193 lines |
Re: FilmMAKERS and Philosophy/MorphicResonance
|
KaiWen Gau |
Sun, 27 Mar 2005 10:05:28 -0800 |
102 lines |
stephanSE
|
stephanSE Linsenhoff |
Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:52:49 +0200 |
94 lines |
FW: Film screening: A Little Bit of Freedom, Wed 27 April 7pm, Goethe-Institut London]
|
Yosefa Loshitzky |
Sun, 27 Mar 2005 15:00:39 +0100 |
464 lines |
9.16 Brunette on Nowell-Smith/Visconti
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 27 Mar 2005 04:42:49 +0000 |
368 lines |
9.15 Sinha on Knight/German cinema
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:05:45 +0000 |
646 lines |
Re: Seeking interns
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 22:29:41 -0800 |
220 lines |
Seeking interns
|
Ariella Ben-Dov |
Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:42:21 -0800 |
118 lines |
The Afterimage of Gilles Deleuze's Film Philosophy
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:48:54 +0000 |
72 lines |
query: intro books on the hollywood musical
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:17:22 -0500 |
38 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 18 Mar 2005 to 19 Mar 2005 (#2005-99)
|
H. Masud Taj |
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:22:01 -0800 |
31 lines |
cinema space in contemporary society
|
caterina abeni |
Sat, 19 Mar 2005 11:51:29 +0000 |
20 lines |
9.14 Blum-Reid's Response
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:22:28 +0000 |
163 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
Tomas Caspary |
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:35:59 +0300 |
44 lines |
Astruc
|
Thomas Deane Tucker |
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 10:29:16 -0700 |
30 lines |
Call for paper: Appel à contribution : super héros au cinéma au 21ème siècle
|
Pierre-Emmanuel FINZI |
Mon, 14 Mar 2005 09:21:53 -0000 |
127 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
Mike Frank |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 19:13:46 -0500 |
85 lines |
Reminder (Cinema and War; Cambridge, UK; 9 June)
|
Nadine Boljkovac |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:07:20 +0000 |
73 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
christiaan cruz |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 22:49:48 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
bill harris |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:07:33 -0500 |
144 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 10:55:11 -0500 |
88 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
Steven Taylor |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:21:28 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 04:52:19 -0800 |
103 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
Tomas Caspary |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:23:23 +0300 |
44 lines |
Re: shanghai
|
WING-FAI LEUNG |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 09:52:53 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Ross Macleay |
Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:55:32 +1100 |
65 lines |
9.13 Martin on Franco-Asian Cinema
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 15:19:39 +0000 |
248 lines |
SFC news
|
P P Powrie |
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:38:24 -0000 |
241 lines |
Shanghai!
|
Magnus Danerek |
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:17:34 +0100 |
47 lines |
Re: battle royale Representations of Power and Control.. your thoughts.
|
gelo - the yellow mellow fellow .. |
Sat, 12 Mar 2005 10:45:11 +1100 |
18 lines |
Salon Netiquette
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 20:18:17 +0000 |
177 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Mar 2005 to 11 Mar 2005 (#2005-92)
|
zavia001 |
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 13:23:18 CST |
370 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Joan Guenther |
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:56:46 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:47:44 -0800 |
75 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Sarah Barmak |
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 02:08:06 -0500 |
50 lines |
Re: sexuality in film
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:35:47 -0800 |
210 lines |
Re: film information
|
bill harris |
Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:12:44 -0500 |
264 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Joan Guenther |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:06:25 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: film information
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:09:42 -0500 |
45 lines |
Re: film information
|
bill harris |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:04:44 -0500 |
401 lines |
Re: battle royale Representations of Power and Control.. your thoughts.
|
noci |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:10:33 +0100 |
43 lines |
battle royale Representations of Power and Control.. your thoughts.
|
Angelo Lara |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 23:01:59 +1100 |
27 lines |
Re: film information
|
Jim Flannery |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 02:57:23 -0800 |
33 lines |
Script News March 2005
|
Peter McLuskie |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:39:13 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast" / The Parade's Gone By
|
muratirpan |
Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:51:30 +0200 |
79 lines |
Re: film information
|
<> |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:10:15 -0500 |
41 lines |
Re: film information
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 14:08:19 -0800 |
57 lines |
film information
|
lyndsay holland |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 21:56:26 +0000 |
89 lines |
9.12 Traverso on the Cinema of Latin America
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:07:19 +0000 |
392 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 8 Mar 2005 (#2005-88)
|
David Smedberg |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 04:09:33 -0500 |
49 lines |
CFP COMPUTER GAMES
|
Andreas Jahn-Sudmann |
Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:49:34 +0100 |
126 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast" / The Parade's Gone By
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:52:13 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast" / The Parade's Gone By
|
Ben Halligan |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 19:25:38 -0000 |
58 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:25:28 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 14:21:14 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: "the iconoclast"
|
Tomas Caspary |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 21:38:39 +0300 |
26 lines |
Re: FilmMAKERS and Philosophy
|
Mike Ashcroft |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 16:30:21 +0000 |
89 lines |
Re: FilmMAKERS and Philosophy
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:55:02 -0500 |
126 lines |
Re: creative geography
|
John Riley |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:47:59 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)/MorphicResonance as a Strategy-Goal
|
bill harris |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 03:48:58 -0500 |
471 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)/MorphicResonance as a Strategy-Goal
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 22:26:23 -0800 |
137 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)/MorphicResonance as a Strategy-Goal
|
Sarah Barmak |
Tue, 8 Mar 2005 00:19:25 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: creative geography
|
Chuck Kleinhans |
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 15:23:54 -0600 |
25 lines |
FilmMAKERS and Philosophy
|
Brock D |
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 14:14:40 -0500 |
24 lines |
A Conference on Fortress Europe and its "Others": Cultural Representations in Film, Media and the Arts, 4-6 April 2005
|
Yosefa Loshitzky |
Mon, 7 Mar 2005 17:24:03 -0000 |
298 lines |
assistance please
|
Matthew Tapey |
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 20:20:36 -0800 |
33 lines |
Re: Creative Geography
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 23:41:26 -0000 |
37 lines |
Creative Geography
|
Paul Taberham |
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 21:17:19 -0000 |
60 lines |
Creative Geography
|
Paul Taberham |
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 21:16:28 -0000 |
60 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)/MorphicResonance as a Strategy-Goal
|
Mikal Howard |
Sun, 6 Mar 2005 03:05:10 -0800 |
608 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)/MorphicResonance as a Strategy-Goal
|
KaiWen Gau |
Sat, 5 Mar 2005 09:44:03 -0800 |
112 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)
|
noci |
Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:36:12 +0100 |
58 lines |
Conference: The Cause of Cosmopolitanism in Europe and Beyond
|
Rascaroli, Laura |
Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:01:50 -0000 |
100 lines |
"AUGENZAUBER: Lust und List im Augen Blick"
|
Visual-Media |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 20:07:00 +0100 |
147 lines |
SFC news
|
P P Powrie |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 19:05:00 -0000 |
100 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)
|
geska |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 15:03:14 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)
|
noci |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:45:00 +0100 |
195 lines |
Re: cinema and globalisation
|
Venkiteswaran Subramanian |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:20:43 +0530 |
40 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)
|
oscar camacho |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 23:49:56 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Trans-Realit(ies)
|
Patrick Crogan |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:14:37 +1030 |
60 lines |
Re: Motion in film and baroque architecture
|
Michelle Langford |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:05:14 +1100 |
42 lines |
motion in film + architecture
|
Felicity Colman |
Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:35:06 +1100 |
112 lines |
Trans-Realit(ies)
|
geska |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 20:06:16 +0100 |
143 lines |
Re: Motion in film and baroque architecture
|
Maurits Bartstra |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:51:29 +0100 |
60 lines |
Re: Motion in film and baroque architecture
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:29:54 -0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Private equity and movies
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:16:38 -0000 |
38 lines |
Re: Motion in film and baroque architecture
|
noci |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:51:15 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Motion in film and baroque architecture
|
Nicky Hamlyn |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:37:53 +0000 |
84 lines |
Re: Motion in film and baroque architecture
|
geska |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:59:27 +0100 |
61 lines |
Motion in film and baroque architecture
|
gul kale |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 02:05:54 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 28 Feb 2005 to 1 Mar 2005 (#2005-80)
|
chandra bhushan gupta |
Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:53:15 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: cinema and globalition
|
Chuck Kleinhans |
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:34:10 -0600 |
23 lines |
Re: cinema and globalisation
|
Mikal Howard |
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 02:42:15 -0800 |
67 lines |
cinema and globalisation
|
Venkiteswaran Subramanian |
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:03:31 +0530 |
27 lines |
privtae equity and movies
|
Anselm Müller |
Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:12:09 +0100 |
24 lines |
Detroit: Ruin of a City
|
Michael Chanan |
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 18:32:04 -0000 |
42 lines |
Re: Private equity and movies
|
Rohesia Hamilton Metcalfe |
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:10:58 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: Private equity and movies
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:15:44 -0500 |
121 lines |
Re: Private equity and movies
|
Matthew H. Bernstein |
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 08:46:50 -0500 |
81 lines |
Re: Private equity and movies
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:07:50 -0800 |
93 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest / Asian cinema
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:47:19 -0800 |
86 lines |
Re: [Bulk] Reflexive performance
|
geska |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:02:19 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 21 Feb 2005 to 22 Feb 2005 (#2005-72)
|
Eric Willstaedt |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:50:36 EST |
71 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 21 Feb 2005 to 22 Feb 2005 (#2005-72)
|
Henry Taylor |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:40:44 +0100 |
77 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 21 Feb 2005 to 22 Feb 2005 (#2005-72)
|
bill harris |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:23:48 -0500 |
169 lines |
Re: Reflexive performance
|
Anna Hindley |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:03:15 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: [Bulk] Reflexive performance
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:07:03 -0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Reflexive performance
|
Rob Ruzic |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:02:13 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 23 Feb 2005 to 24 Feb 2005 (#2005-74)
|
Nick Army |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:42:50 -0800 |
689 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 23 Feb 2005 to 24 Feb 2005 (#2005-74)
|
Robert Koehler |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:33:31 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: Reflexive performance
|
Rohesia Hamilton Metcalfe |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:28:08 -0800 |
56 lines |
Reflexive performance
|
John Adams. Department of Drama : theatre, film, television |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:41:21 -0000 |
27 lines |
LEARNING ON SCREEN CONFERENCE AND AWARDS 2005
|
Sergio Angelini |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 15:23:51 +0000 |
61 lines |
Private Equity Companies and movies
|
Anselm Müller |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:13:15 +0100 |
26 lines |
Private equity and movies
|
Anselm Müller |
Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:46:09 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Vancouver
|
Sarah Barmak |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:45:57 -0500 |
148 lines |
Re: Vancouver
|
Paul Iannone |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:45:06 -0800 |
67 lines |
Vancouver
|
Robert Koehler |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 11:18:21 -0800 |
44 lines |
"Pretend" screening in Paris tomorrow
|
Cara O'Connor |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:05:16 -0800 |
75 lines |
Vancouver as film location
|
Benjamin McCann |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:45:17 +0000 |
32 lines |
American Anthems (London)
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:16:40 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 21 Feb 2005 to 22 Feb 2005 (#2005-72)
|
Paul Iannone |
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:27:20 -0800 |
62 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 21 Feb 2005 to 22 Feb 2005 (#2005-72)
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:33:35 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 21 Feb 2005 to 22 Feb 2005 (#2005-72)
|
Sukhbir Garewal |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 05:30:19 +0000 |
88 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 21 Feb 2005 to 22 Feb 2005 (#2005-72)
|
chandra bhushan gupta |
Wed, 23 Feb 2005 04:29:02 +0000 |
71 lines |
Trinh T Minh-Ha/Indexicality and Virtuality
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:03 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: The Short Film
|
Melissa Gronlund |
Tue, 22 Feb 2005 01:28:10 -0800 |
68 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
Lisa Purse |
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:55:24 -0000 |
22 lines |
Re: waking up in movies
|
julie@yahoo |
Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:07:54 -0800 |
160 lines |
Re: relation of inner and outer worlds - and more!
|
eduardomauro |
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:07:40 -0300 |
112 lines |
Call for Papers for Film and Philosophy
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:45:11 -0500 |
115 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 19 Feb 2005 to 20 Feb 2005 (#2005-70)
|
Maria H. Spector |
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 18:16:23 -0000 |
215 lines |
Cassavetes Opening Night
|
Paul Taberham |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:46:20 -0000 |
78 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
Paul Taberham |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:44:15 -0000 |
77 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
<> |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:53:10 +0000 |
29 lines |
waking up in movies
|
francesca liguoro |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:38:13 +0100 |
61 lines |
9.11 Wurzer's Response
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:14:33 +0000 |
1152 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
Henry Taylor |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:33:22 +0100 |
34 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
jmatturr |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 09:13:55 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
Glen Fuller |
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:38:42 +1100 |
25 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
Glen Fuller |
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:33:56 +1100 |
24 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:30:16 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
<> |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:26:42 EST |
57 lines |
Re: revenge in movies
|
<> |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:23:02 EST |
50 lines |
waking up in movies
|
Glen Fuller |
Sun, 20 Feb 2005 00:17:07 +1100 |
24 lines |
revenge in movies
|
Maria H. Spector |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 13:12:05 -0000 |
23 lines |
sleep in movies
|
Maria H. Spector |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:10:45 -0000 |
21 lines |
Films that introduce key characters as they wake up
|
Tessa Dwyer |
Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:15:07 +1100 |
22 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Joyes Burris |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:05:16 -0800 |
23 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Maya McKechneay |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:14:54 +0100 |
22 lines |
The Short Film
|
Dean Summers |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:40:20 +0000 |
25 lines |
Films that introduce key characters as they wake up
|
Catherine Wheatley |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 15:23:12 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Art McGee |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:36:54 -0800 |
26 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Art McGee |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 05:30:12 -0800 |
25 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Vesna Madzoski |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:21:42 +0100 |
50 lines |
AW: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:14:44 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Anna Hindley |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:16:00 +0000 |
51 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Mark Little |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:17:52 -0000 |
67 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Jeppe Knudsen |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:34:11 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
jmatturr |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:46:03 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
<> |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:25:27 EST |
50 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Ron Tuch |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:04:31 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:47:39 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
muratirpan |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 01:38:17 +0200 |
49 lines |
Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Dan McGowan |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:32:26 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: Films that introduce key characters as they wake up?
|
Harrison, Thomas |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 15:30:29 -0800 |
20 lines |
AW: Borrowed Sounds
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 00:02:09 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Borrowed Sounds
|
<> |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:59:09 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: Borrowed Sounds
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:45:52 -0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Borrowed Sounds
|
<> |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:28:28 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Borrowed Sounds
|
Shahin Ismail-Beigi |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:15:20 -0500 |
62 lines |
Borrowed Sounds
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:51:41 +0100 |
36 lines |
Early Dutch Conjuring Book & Magic Lantern / Simon Witgeest
|
Visual-Media |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:04:46 +0100 |
81 lines |
Re: Fw: PLEASE SEND THIS TO ALL YOU KNOW.]
|
Kbone |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 00:50:42 -0800 |
85 lines |
Conjuring in stereo (tissue) photographs.
|
Visual-Media |
Thu, 17 Feb 2005 01:13:04 +0100 |
98 lines |
9.10 Hesler on Wurzer
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:48:14 +0000 |
652 lines |
Conference update
|
Dr Daniel Meyer-Dinkgrafe |
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:24:10 -0000 |
38 lines |
9.9 Choe on Wurzer
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:55:20 +0000 |
357 lines |
Re: exhuming Jom Joad
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:36:21 -0800 |
394 lines |
Re: locating Billy Budd
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:22:01 -0500 |
32 lines |
locating Billy Budd
|
Nathan Andersen |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 15:02:12 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: P2P
|
John Riley |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:14:40 +0000 |
150 lines |
Re: P2P
|
oscar camacho |
Fri, 11 Feb 2005 01:06:51 -0400 |
145 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Besze Flóra |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 22:28:29 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: P2P
|
oscar camacho |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 16:43:45 -0400 |
107 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Feb 2005 (#2005-60)
|
Alan Fair |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 20:06:42 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: 9.8 Chauderlot on Wurzer
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:29:34 +0000 |
28 lines |
P2P
|
Greg Little |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:24:16 -0800 |
50 lines |
Book about LA VIE NOUVELLE BY PHILIPPE GRANDRIEUX
|
nicole brenez |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:38:04 +0100 |
110 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Jane Bryce |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:22:53 -0400 |
19 lines |
Cinéma et engagement
|
P P Powrie |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 15:04:55 -0000 |
103 lines |
Re: P2P [But for everyone to read]
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:50:47 +0000 |
41 lines |
CFP: Journeys Across Media Postgraduate Conference at Reading University
|
Lisa Purse |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:49:19 -0000 |
96 lines |
Re: P2P
|
John Riley |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:40:43 +0000 |
299 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Marcus Werner Hed |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:25:18 +0000 |
52 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Jakob Hesler |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:16:35 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Melissa Gronlund |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 02:17:39 -0800 |
244 lines |
Re: P2P
|
monika jaeckel |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 09:14:46 +0100 |
83 lines |
Re: P2P
|
oscar camacho |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:08:11 -0400 |
243 lines |
definitive techniques of asian film
|
Angelo Lara |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:04:53 +1100 |
20 lines |
Re: Huckabees, Existentialism & Buddhism
|
Dan Garrett |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:48:52 -0800 |
265 lines |
Re: the forest
|
yoshida harumi |
Thu, 10 Feb 2005 01:25:00 +0900 |
21 lines |
9.8 Chauderlot on Wurzer
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 16:12:38 +0000 |
586 lines |
Re: the forest
|
jmatturr |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:25:01 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:54:41 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Maya McKechneay |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:11:35 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: the forest and Deleuze
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:42:28 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Sarah Barmak |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 02:34:13 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Rob Luzecky |
Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:10:09 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Nicky Hamlyn |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:37:09 +0000 |
62 lines |
CFPs - Celebrity Culture conference
|
Andy Miah |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:29:28 +0000 |
226 lines |
Forests
|
Lucy Fraser |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:23:11 -0000 |
21 lines |
Egyptian cinema
|
Jane Mitchell |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 17:22:32 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Ricardo Greene F. |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:38:26 -0300 |
30 lines |
2005.02.08 Film-Philosophy News
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:33:15 +0000 |
1469 lines |
the forest
|
Greg Little |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 07:03:28 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 09:33:21 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Matthew H. Bernstein |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:47:43 -0500 |
66 lines |
VS: the forest
|
Boris Vidovic |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:36:48 +0200 |
66 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:25:30 -0500 |
106 lines |
Re: the forest
|
Mark Little |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:18:52 -0000 |
77 lines |
the forest
|
Sarah Caylor |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:02:44 -0500 |
37 lines |
face-to-face
|
Ch. Katti |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 11:47:04 +0100 |
57 lines |
Pictorial photographs & the Choreutoscope
|
Visual-Media |
Tue, 8 Feb 2005 00:53:41 +0100 |
297 lines |
Film-Philosophy salon reminder
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 23:00:01 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Harriette Grissom |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 11:15:57 -0500 |
66 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:40:07 -0000 |
72 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Feb 2005 to 6 Feb 2005 (#2005-51)
|
Roberta Morris |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 15:34:23 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Steven Taylor |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:14:03 +0000 |
206 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Juan Antonio Rivera Vila |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:47:04 +0100 |
182 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Juan Antonio Rivera Vila |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:46:50 +0100 |
46 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Jakob Hesler |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:08:48 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: P2P
|
geska |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:44:23 +0100 |
150 lines |
9.7 Donougho on Wurzer
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 7 Feb 2005 00:37:48 +0000 |
224 lines |
Re: P2P
|
Juan Antonio Rivera Vila |
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 23:10:57 +0100 |
101 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Sarah Barmak |
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:21:12 -0500 |
175 lines |
CFP: Cinema, War and a Society of Spectacle (Cambridge, UK; 9 June 05)
|
N Boljkovac |
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:08:38 +0000 |
85 lines |
Re: P2P
|
yehuda stav |
Sun, 6 Feb 2005 11:12:15 +0200 |
139 lines |
P2P
|
Paul Taberham |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 19:56:22 -0000 |
87 lines |
Fw: face-to-face German research
|
Joanna Barck |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 18:27:55 +0100 |
188 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Steven Taylor |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 16:33:36 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
<> |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 08:58:55 EST |
42 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 2 Feb 2005 to 3 Feb 2005 (#2005-47)
|
CAROLINE WARD |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 12:41:06 +0000 |
21 lines |
9.6 Szeman on Wurzer
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 12:11:00 +0000 |
319 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Nicky Hamlyn |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 09:58:40 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Sarah Barmak |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 00:56:45 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: ...
|
joan carol urquhart |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:35:04 -0500 |
22 lines |
Re: ...
|
Sarah Barmak |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:23:52 -0500 |
55 lines |
...
|
joan carol urquhart |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 23:19:45 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: face
|
Patrick Crogan |
Sat, 5 Feb 2005 14:19:42 +1030 |
37 lines |
a couple of questions
|
Rose Theresa |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 20:46:39 -0500 |
31 lines |
face-to-face
|
Dean Summers |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 17:31:40 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: Male beauty
|
[log in to unmask] |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 11:10:54 -0500 |
40 lines |
Re: Male beauty
|
Harriette Grissom |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:19:17 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
John Riley |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:55:03 +0000 |
34 lines |
face-to-face
|
Dean Summers |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:26:21 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Anna Hindley |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:23:55 +0000 |
67 lines |
Re: face
|
Adrian Martin |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:05:35 +1000 |
29 lines |
Wurzer Glossary
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:44:47 +0000 |
63 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Ken Mogg |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 01:42:13 +0000 |
59 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:08:19 -0000 |
23 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Paul Taberham |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:56:40 -0000 |
90 lines |
Re: face in cinema
|
Adrian Martin |
Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:53:26 +1000 |
54 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 2 Feb 2005 to 3 Feb 2005 (#2005-47)
|
Mary Helen Kolisnyk |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:39:56 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:36:20 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: face in cinema
|
jmatturr |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:05:53 -0500 |
31 lines |
Male beauty
|
Greg Little |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:31:41 -0800 |
46 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:38:50 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:35:32 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
<> |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:23:26 -0500 |
18 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:27:30 -0800 |
51 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Rob Luzecky |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:53:23 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Rob Luzecky |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:49:02 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:22:53 -0800 |
235 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
christiaan cruz |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:39:59 +0000 |
19 lines |
Re: male beauty and psychosis
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:13:38 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
jmatturr |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:43:50 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
yehuda stav |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:45:50 +0200 |
88 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
John Riley |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:38:32 +0000 |
48 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
geska |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:15:26 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
Venkiteswaran Subramanian |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:36:46 +0530 |
20 lines |
Re: face-to-face
|
geska |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:05:01 +0100 |
51 lines |
face-to-face
|
Alex Gerbaz |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 09:17:23 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Paul Stambolis |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:49:34 +1100 |
61 lines |
Re: CFP E. Asian Cinema
|
WING-FAI LEUNG |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 05:55:25 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
christiaan cruz |
Thu, 3 Feb 2005 03:59:38 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Julie Talen |
Wed, 2 Feb 2005 21:28:08 -0500 |
111 lines |
Response to Bersani & Duthoit
|
patrick ffrench |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:57:43 -0000 |
226 lines |
February 2005: Issue on Wurzer
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 16:46:58 +0000 |
55 lines |
The Grotesque
|
andrew court |
Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:33:30 +1100 |
23 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 27 Jan 2005 to 28 Jan 2005 (#2005-41)
|
O'Shaughnessy, Martin |
Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:42:07 -0000 |
46 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 28 Jan 2005 to 29 Jan 2005 (#2005-42)
|
martha rosler |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 23:35:04 +0100 |
20 lines |
Written words
|
Martijn Boven |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:23:00 +0100 |
23 lines |
films using printed text
|
Gary Gach |
Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:00:04 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: written words
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 19:20:28 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
John Riley |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 16:31:38 +0000 |
66 lines |
erotic violence
|
John Bleasdale |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:44:59 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: AW: The grotesque
|
<> |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:30:35 -0500 |
18 lines |
AW: The grotesque
|
Andrea Braidt |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 15:47:10 +0100 |
132 lines |
films using printed text
|
Simon Krysl |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:32:02 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: The grotesque
|
Helen Tragea |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:50:16 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: erotic violence
|
WING-FAI LEUNG |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 03:46:43 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Shahin Ismail-Beigi |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:45:54 -0500 |
19 lines |
written words
|
Lee Parpart |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 14:18:26 -0500 |
24 lines |
The grotesque
|
Martijn Boven |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 19:57:16 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
jmatturr |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:15:38 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: written words in film
|
Adrian Martin |
Fri, 28 Jan 2005 01:21:35 +1000 |
23 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Adrian Martin |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 23:00:12 +1000 |
38 lines |
PHD STUDENTSHIPS - St Andrews
|
D. Martin-Jones |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:30:34 +0000 |
49 lines |
Films using Written Word
|
Richard Armstrong |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 05:09:10 EST |
57 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Michael Chanan |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:28:00 -0000 |
64 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Shahin Ismail-Beigi |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 03:39:40 -0500 |
204 lines |
Re: loss of identity...
|
Henry Taylor |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:26:36 +0100 |
84 lines |
Re: loss of identity...
|
Henry Taylor |
Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:24:31 +0100 |
247 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Irina Leimbacher |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:55:22 -0800 |
42 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Scott Cole |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:18:16 -0600 |
35 lines |
9.5 Bersani and Dutoit's Response
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 23:44:59 +0000 |
109 lines |
Re: loss of identity...
|
Blair Miller |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:27:25 -0500 |
79 lines |
9.4 Caws on Bersani and Dutoit
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:04:13 +0000 |
416 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Kendall D'Andrade |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 12:52:03 -0600 |
68 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Greg Little |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:33:45 -0800 |
41 lines |
films using printed text
|
Christian Katti |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 19:27:33 +0100 |
45 lines |
films using printed text
|
CAROLINE WARD |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:24:47 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
John Riley |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 18:03:07 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
christiaan cruz |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 17:51:43 +0000 |
19 lines |
PhD Studentships - University of St Andrews
|
D. Martin-Jones |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:04:06 +0000 |
124 lines |
CFP
|
Francesca Liguoro |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 08:04:15 -0700 |
91 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Steven Taylor |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:48:33 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
<> |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:20:54 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Patricia Molloy |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:05:10 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Simon |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:34:30 +0000 |
101 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 05:05:58 -0800 |
48 lines |
Re: VS: films using printed text
|
<> |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 06:44:57 EST |
57 lines |
VS: films using printed text
|
Boris Vidovic |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:24:07 +0200 |
31 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Hana Dvornik |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:20:14 GMT |
27 lines |
Re: films using printed text
|
Ilkka Levä |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:02:20 +0200 |
50 lines |
films using printed text
|
Chuck Kleinhans |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:52:47 -0600 |
26 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 25 Jan 2005 to 26 Jan 2005 - Special issue (#2005-36)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:36:51 -0000 |
23 lines |
Re: loss of identity...
|
Ron |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:21:23 -0500 |
58 lines |
EINSTEIN'S THEORY OF RELATIVITY
|
robert andrew |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 01:29:05 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Scott Cole |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:37:01 -0600 |
47 lines |
Re: london spaces
|
Julie Talen |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:08:49 -0500 |
114 lines |
Re: loss of identity...
|
Dr Jason Jacobs |
Wed, 26 Jan 2005 07:35:13 +1000 |
64 lines |
Re: loss of identity...
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:16:25 -0000 |
23 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Greg Little |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:30:41 -0800 |
42 lines |
Erotic Violence
|
Lee Parpart |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:18:58 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:07:11 -0500 |
31 lines |
Erotic Violence
|
Greg Little |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 10:58:35 -0800 |
35 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence - side bar
|
jmatturr |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:46:58 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence - side bar
|
christiaan cruz |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 18:30:44 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 25 Jan 2005 (#2005-35)
|
Robert Burgoyne |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:19:02 -0500 |
237 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence - side bar
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 12:50:27 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Mike Hansen |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:54:58 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: loss of identity...
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:25:59 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 08:05:39 -0800 |
62 lines |
9.3 ffrench on Bersani and Dutoit
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 16:02:34 +0000 |
430 lines |
loss of identity...
|
Tim Vermeulen |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:26:04 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 06:35:45 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Glen Fuller |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:27:45 +1100 |
41 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
geska |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 11:24:51 +0100 |
24 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Helen Tragea |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:38:57 -0800 |
40 lines |
AW: Erotic Violence
|
Jutta Scheibelberger |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 09:28:03 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Dr Jason Jacobs |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 17:19:29 +1000 |
113 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Mikal Howard |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:56:26 -0800 |
75 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:20:10 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Shahin Ismail-Beigi |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 23:05:07 -0500 |
78 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
jmatturr |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 22:14:06 -0500 |
33 lines |
Re: Erotic Violence
|
Patrick Crogan |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 13:12:01 +1030 |
47 lines |
Erotic Violence
|
Jason Jacobs |
Tue, 25 Jan 2005 02:29:05 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Scott Cole |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:06:17 -0600 |
33 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Kees Bakker |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:44:31 +0100 |
88 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Shaw, Dan |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 08:17:22 -0500 |
42 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 12:22:17 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Scott Cole |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:03:44 -0600 |
147 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
David Collett |
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:46:09 +1100 |
33 lines |
Janus Head 7.2 (Announcement & Table of Contents)
|
Costica Bradatan |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 17:35:02 +0000 |
160 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:57:10 -0000 |
46 lines |
Salon Netiquette
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 13:43:52 +0000 |
172 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Sun, 23 Jan 2005 11:13:01 -0000 |
44 lines |
Re: Moving on to t...
|
julie@yahoo |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:14:26 -0800 |
232 lines |
Re: Moving on to t...
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 05:49:34 -0800 |
73 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Kees Bakker |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 10:57:31 +0000 |
33 lines |
Re: Lyotard
|
Glen Fuller |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:13:50 +1100 |
37 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
jmatturr |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:36:26 -0500 |
53 lines |
Re: Lyotard
|
John Maguire |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:05:34 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:55:34 -0500 |
62 lines |
Re: The Dave and Mike Show
|
Dave Beech |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:29:13 -0000 |
93 lines |
Moving on to the topic of Sci-Fi
|
Shaw, Dan |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:26:21 -0500 |
35 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:17:42 -0000 |
26 lines |
Re: The Dave and Mike Show
|
Daniel Barnett |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 16:04:17 EST |
84 lines |
not only, but also...
|
ms rowell |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 20:28:07 +0000 |
76 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Chris Lynn |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:41:02 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: The Dave and Mike Show
|
Greg Little |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:40:53 -0800 |
34 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Kees Bakker |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:04:09 +0000 |
35 lines |
Re: The Dave and Mike Show
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:53:21 -0500 |
54 lines |
The Dave and Mike Show
|
Greg Little |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 10:39:59 -0800 |
29 lines |
Lyotard
|
Thomas Deane Tucker |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:34:44 -0700 |
25 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:09:26 -0000 |
29 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Kees Bakker |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:03:18 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: The Dave and Mike Show
|
Dave Beech |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 17:55:22 -0000 |
110 lines |
Re: The Dave and Mike Show
|
Mikal Howard |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 09:49:51 -0800 |
102 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Kees Bakker |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 18:48:10 +0100 |
79 lines |
The Dave and Mike Show
|
Daniel Barnett |
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 12:32:19 EST |
97 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Paul Stambolis |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 03:43:48 +1100 |
182 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
Paul Stambolis |
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 03:38:56 +1100 |
50 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Scott Cole |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 22:44:11 -0600 |
67 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 21:09:09 -0000 |
53 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Jane Bryce |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 16:52:45 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
michaelP |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:47:41 +0000 |
43 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:42:03 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:27:57 -0000 |
32 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:22:08 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 20:18:28 -0000 |
19 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:10:10 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:54:16 -0000 |
131 lines |
Re: On _Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts_
|
Daniel Barnett |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:52:01 EST |
150 lines |
reviews
|
Lee Parpart |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:45:13 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: male beauty
|
lysa rivera |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:20:37 -0800 |
44 lines |
male beauty
|
Philippa Thomas |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:16:20 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: On _Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts_
|
Shaw, Dan |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:20:33 -0500 |
39 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
michaelP |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:52:46 +0000 |
93 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:38:05 -0500 |
65 lines |
Re: On _Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts_
|
koshy tharakan |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:14:39 +0000 |
49 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 09:23:13 -0000 |
37 lines |
CFP Herzog's Cinema: Between the Visionary and the Documentary
|
Silke Panse |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:42:59 +0000 |
90 lines |
Re: CFP Transnational E. Asian Cinema
|
WING-FAI LEUNG |
Thu, 20 Jan 2005 03:25:42 +0000 |
55 lines |
Film Reviewing
|
Richard Armstrong |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:23:46 EST |
56 lines |
Re: SFC conference March/April
|
dammy Babs |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:24:00 -0800 |
123 lines |
film reviews online
|
Ken Chen |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 13:54:00 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Film Review Query
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 07:29:22 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: On _Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts_
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:27:05 -0500 |
119 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 18 Jan 2005 (#2005-25)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:22:22 -0000 |
21 lines |
Re: Film Review Query
|
Mike Frank |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:00:10 -0500 |
98 lines |
On _Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts_
|
Daniel Barnett |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:50:37 EST |
133 lines |
Film Websites
|
Richard Armstrong |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 15:14:04 EST |
77 lines |
Re: Film Review Query
|
yehuda stav |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:37:02 +0200 |
91 lines |
|
caterina abeni |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 16:12:34 +0000 |
19 lines |
Film Review Query
|
Richard Armstrong |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:25:52 EST |
57 lines |
SFC conference March/April
|
P P Powrie |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 14:28:41 -0000 |
42 lines |
9.2 Lee on Wittgenstein, Theory and the Arts
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 12:56:50 +0000 |
615 lines |
Genre labelling and dating
|
Adrian Martin |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 18:08:50 +1000 |
52 lines |
indexicality v. specificity
|
John A. Woodward |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 06:03:34 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: Welles and theater
|
<> |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:32:18 EST |
89 lines |
Welles and theater
|
Ken Chen |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 23:01:40 -0500 |
31 lines |
"cyberpunk" meets real world
|
Dan McGowan |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 22:38:47 -0500 |
285 lines |
Re: City as dreamscape
|
christiaan cruz |
Tue, 18 Jan 2005 01:18:50 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: film review query
|
Stehen Strother |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:53:32 -0800 |
80 lines |
film review query
|
Mike Frank |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 13:16:37 -0500 |
66 lines |
cyper-punk
|
O'Shaughnessy, Martin |
Mon, 17 Jan 2005 10:29:37 -0000 |
34 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Daniel Barnett |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 21:09:24 EST |
227 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
Mike Frank |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 18:25:44 -0500 |
79 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:15:42 -0800 |
267 lines |
Re: another cyberpunk
|
Mikal Howard |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 15:08:16 -0800 |
212 lines |
Re: another cyberpunk
|
julie@yahoo |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:39:34 -0800 |
279 lines |
Re: east asian film
|
Wayne Spencer |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:36:07 -0000 |
51 lines |
east asian film
|
Miriam Ross |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 20:19:00 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Kees Bakker |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 16:42:56 +0100 |
132 lines |
Re: another cyberpunk
|
geska |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 08:06:34 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: cyberpunk films
|
O'Healy, Dr. Áine |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:21:07 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: cyberpunk films
|
Angelo Lara |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:10:31 +1100 |
32 lines |
another cyberpunk
|
geska |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:09:12 +0100 |
92 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
geska |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 23:33:25 +0100 |
180 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:44:06 -0500 |
51 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Daniel Barnett |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:29:52 EST |
129 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 10:56:03 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
<> |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:45:48 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
Angelo Lara |
Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:36:22 +1100 |
26 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
geska |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 15:29:43 +0100 |
154 lines |
Threads and 'Subject' lines
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:19:07 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:44:54 -0500 |
83 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Kees Bakker |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 14:42:46 +0100 |
102 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
Shaw, Dan |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:26:26 -0500 |
55 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:31:37 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
geska |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 12:31:31 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
[log in to unmask] :) |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 20:11:48 +0900 |
55 lines |
Re: "cyberpunk" films
|
Sarah Barmak |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 05:41:11 -0500 |
29 lines |
"cyberpunk" films
|
Angelo Lara |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 19:12:48 +1100 |
28 lines |
de-sign
|
michaelP |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 06:52:10 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 to 13 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)
|
Paul Stambolis |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 17:19:22 +1100 |
50 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 to 13 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)
|
Ricardo Greene F. |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:37:56 -0300 |
25 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 to 13 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)
|
Sarah Barmak |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:32:00 -0500 |
27 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 to 13 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)
|
Ricardo Greene F. |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 02:27:38 -0300 |
25 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 to 13 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)
|
bill harris |
Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:20:53 -0500 |
108 lines |
Re: O, What a Lovely War!
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 18:10:58 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: O, What a Lovely War!
|
Jim Flannery |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:51:17 -0800 |
31 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 to 13 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)
|
Ricardo Greene F. |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 17:47:18 -0300 |
19 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 to 13 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:03:08 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 to 13 Jan 2005 (#2005-17)
|
Daniel Barnett |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:26:47 EST |
228 lines |
Re: > 1. what is a sign? (5)
|
Ch. Katti |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 20:26:05 +0100 |
120 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:02:24 -0500 |
70 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 (#2005-16)
|
O'Shaughnessy, Martin |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 09:38:34 -0000 |
44 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
koshy tharakan |
Thu, 13 Jan 2005 06:09:18 +0000 |
64 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 12 Jan 2005 (#2005-16)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:40:49 -0000 |
24 lines |
FYI: James Baldwin, Hero, Stage Beauty, Kinsey, and Alexander
|
Dan Garrett |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 13:47:14 -0800 |
133 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:30:12 -0000 |
208 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:03:47 -0500 |
75 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Daniel Barnett |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 14:16:47 EST |
85 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 12:13:22 -0500 |
99 lines |
Re: O, What a Lovely War!
|
Anna Hindley |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:06:48 +0000 |
30 lines |
Re: O, What a Lovely War!
|
<> |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:50:49 -0500 |
19 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:42:28 -0000 |
117 lines |
O, What a Lovely War!
|
Martha P. Nochimson |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:39:43 -0500 |
49 lines |
what is a sign?
|
Daniel Barnett |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:34:18 EST |
73 lines |
9.1 Bell-Metereau on Memory and Popular Film
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 15:30:18 +0000 |
329 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 08:47:06 -0500 |
110 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
koshy tharakan |
Wed, 12 Jan 2005 11:28:58 +0000 |
81 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
julie@yahoo |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:18:05 -0800 |
189 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jan 2005 to 11 Jan 2005 (#2005-14)
|
Greg Little |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 14:16:54 -0800 |
30 lines |
Re: Burroughs / Cage influence on Film.
|
oscar camacho |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:53:15 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Burroughs / Cage influence on Film
|
Steven Taylor |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 21:02:27 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Burroughs / Cage influence on Film
|
Paul Taberham |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:16:26 -0000 |
118 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 10 Jan 2005 to 11 Jan 2005 (#2005-14)
|
<> |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 13:22:21 EST |
22 lines |
Re: Haunted Schools
|
wayne spencer |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 15:46:20 +0000 |
42 lines |
AW: Haunted Schools
|
Bernd Herzogenrath |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:45:38 +0100 |
30 lines |
Haunted Schools
|
geska |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 16:32:29 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: kine-japan
|
christiaan cruz |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 08:59:05 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
geska |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:27:44 +0100 |
21 lines |
Re: Burroughs / Cage influence on Film.
|
jmatturr |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:12:45 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Burroughs / Cage influence on Film.
|
<> |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 23:37:58 EST |
63 lines |
Burroughs / Cage influence on Film.
|
Steven Taylor |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 03:20:04 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Patrick Crogan |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:46:55 +1030 |
54 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Ken Mogg |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 06:02:44 +1100 |
37 lines |
Re: product and brand placement (AMOLAD)
|
Ken Mogg |
Tue, 11 Jan 2005 05:41:08 +1100 |
25 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 4 Jan 2005 to 5 Jan 2005 - Special issue (#2005-4)
|
O'Shaughnessy, Martin |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 14:16:12 -0000 |
39 lines |
Re: product and brand placement (AMOLAD)
|
Sutton - Damian Peter |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:18:01 -0000 |
70 lines |
Re: Korean films based on folklore and Korean folktales and legends
|
Jia Jun |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 13:25:17 +0800 |
71 lines |
CFP: 11th Laterna Film Academy
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 00:48:14 +0000 |
201 lines |
to Henry, and any other dissatisfied semioticians
|
Daniel Barnett |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 14:13:02 EST |
93 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Robert Frank Sargent |
Sun, 9 Jan 2005 17:57:07 -0000 |
41 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 23:31:16 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: White in film
|
Paul Taberham |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:58:32 -0000 |
76 lines |
Re: White in film
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 11:20:15 +0000 |
25 lines |
White in film
|
Dean Summers |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:33:28 +0000 |
24 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Daniel Barnett |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 13:22:31 EST |
189 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Mike Frank |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:11:16 -0500 |
64 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Daniel Barnett |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:54:57 EST |
60 lines |
Re: Asian film websites
|
Jia Jun |
Sat, 8 Jan 2005 00:44:22 +0800 |
34 lines |
Re: City as dreamscape
|
Glenn Ward |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 06:56:37 EST |
53 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
duffinrk |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 11:03:48 +1300 |
21 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Dave Beech |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:56:15 -0000 |
38 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 6 Jan 2005 to 7 Jan 2005 - Special issue (#2005-9)
|
Lucy Fraser |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:27:05 -0000 |
21 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 10:22:23 +0000 |
45 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Ricardo Greene F. |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 02:50:43 -0300 |
34 lines |
Re: kine-japan
|
R.W. Davis Jr |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 04:14:54 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Jan 2005 to 6 Jan 2005 - Special issue(#2005-6)
|
Patrick Crogan |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:11:05 +1030 |
45 lines |
Progress in 2005
|
Adrian Martin |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 14:13:56 +1100 |
25 lines |
Re: what is a sign?
|
Paul Stambolis |
Fri, 7 Jan 2005 12:48:34 +1100 |
46 lines |
what is a sign?
|
Daniel Barnett |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:08:38 EST |
131 lines |
Fw: PLEASE SEND THIS TO ALL YOU KNOW.]
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 20:36:14 -0000 |
103 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 19:04:12 -0000 |
31 lines |
Re: horror as genre
|
Lieselotte van Dun |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:50:51 +0000 |
17 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
<> |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:48:43 +0000 |
37 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:33:48 -0000 |
65 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:28:21 -0000 |
33 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:10:20 -0500 |
224 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Paul Melia |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 17:59:12 +0000 |
71 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 16:45:45 -0000 |
48 lines |
horror as genre
|
jmatturr |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:17:03 -0500 |
24 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Paul Melia |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:53:47 +0000 |
68 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
<> |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 14:47:07 +0000 |
34 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Mike Frank |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:56:04 -0500 |
84 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Mikal Howard |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 05:37:58 -0800 |
53 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Dave Beech |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 13:22:34 -0000 |
85 lines |
Digesting the Salon
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:08:49 +0000 |
79 lines |
Re: Scape as dreamscape
|
John Riley |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 10:37:14 +0000 |
65 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Jan 2005 to 6 Jan 2005 - Special issue (#2005-6)
|
chandra bhushan gupta |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 08:24:05 +0000 |
287 lines |
asian film websites or forums
|
Angelo Lara |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 18:59:38 +1100 |
23 lines |
Re: Scape as dreamscape
|
Sarah Barmak |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 02:47:13 -0500 |
298 lines |
Scape as dreamscape
|
Ross Macleay |
Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:19:40 +1100 |
99 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 17:14:42 -0500 |
44 lines |
index/icon/CGI
|
Greg Little |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:09:47 -0800 |
50 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Anthony Richards |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:57:21 -0000 |
47 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:55:37 -0500 |
72 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Dave Beech |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:31:21 -0000 |
80 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Dave Beech |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 21:05:10 -0000 |
50 lines |
Re: index/icon/CGI
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:00:54 -0500 |
103 lines |
index/icon/CGI
|
david tetzlaff |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:28:23 -0500 |
36 lines |
City as dreamscape
|
Greg Little |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:18:32 -0800 |
20 lines |
Re: City as dreamscape
|
Chris Lynn |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:32:11 -0800 |
28 lines |
Re: City as dreamscape
|
Rob Ruzic |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:11:13 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 5 Jan 2005 (#2005-5)
|
Christelle Le Fauchueur |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:40:52 -0500 |
21 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Dave Beech |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:35:56 -0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Mike Frank |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:22:54 -0500 |
152 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Dava L. Simpson |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:09:35 -0800 |
111 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:08:36 +0000 |
32 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Paul Melia |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 15:08:03 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Peter Taylor |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:01:56 +0100 |
48 lines |
Re: FILM-PHILOSOPHY Digest - 4 Jan 2005 to 5 Jan 2005 - Special issue (#2005-4)
|
Peter Brunette |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 09:47:54 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Dave Beech |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 13:17:03 -0000 |
49 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:47:45 +0000 |
27 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:12:06 +0000 |
25 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:08:14 +0000 |
26 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Dave Beech |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:05:24 -0000 |
43 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Henry M. Taylor |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:00:20 +0000 |
29 lines |
stephanSE
|
stephanSE Linsenhoff |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 12:59:18 +0100 |
32 lines |
Re: Indexicality v. specificity
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:48:46 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: square one
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:38:30 +0000 |
23 lines |
Re: stephanSE Russell and Grant
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:18:38 +0000 |
23 lines |
skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Dean Summers |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:02:27 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: stephanSE Russell and Grant
|
Alan Fair |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 11:01:07 +0000 |
22 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
<> |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 10:19:09 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Tessa Dwyer |
Wed, 5 Jan 2005 16:45:01 +1100 |
32 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Jim Flannery |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 19:18:10 -0800 |
29 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Dan McGowan |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:59:53 -0500 |
46 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Jim Flannery |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:07:52 -0800 |
25 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
jmatturr |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:56:48 -0500 |
23 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Julia.Rice |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 21:54:34 -0000 |
30 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Matthew Bernstein |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 16:48:00 -0500 |
155 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Paul Taberham |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 20:56:05 -0000 |
77 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
yehuda stav |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 22:27:25 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: city as dreamscape
|
Shaw, Dan |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 14:35:10 -0500 |
28 lines |
city as dreamscape
|
Chris Lynn |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 18:35:03 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Hans Heydebreck |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:21:06 -0800 |
36 lines |
Re: skipping records as a suspense tool
|
Mike Hansen |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 10:23:11 -0500 |
32 lines |
Re: Race in Night of the Living Dead
|
<> |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:15:19 -0500 |
18 lines |
Race in Night of the Living Dead
|
Elaine Pigeon |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 09:04:11 -0500 |
58 lines |
Philosophy in Film Conference
|
Film-Philosophy Editor |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:00:49 +0000 |
42 lines |
product and brand placement
|
jane mills |
Tue, 4 Jan 2005 12:14:31 +1100 |
83 lines |
"white" in film
|
Andrea Braidt |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 16:33:55 +0100 |
208 lines |
Early aviation & and motorcar races in press photography by M. Rol
|
Visual-Media |
Mon, 3 Jan 2005 00:11:45 +0100 |
146 lines |
new ROUGE up
|
Adrian Martin |
Sun, 2 Jan 2005 13:38:32 +1100 |
27 lines |
Re: stephanSE Before Sunrise....
|
Shaw, Dan |
Sat, 1 Jan 2005 15:21:10 -0500 |
32 lines |
stephanSE Before Sunrise....
|
stephanSE Linsenhoff |
Sat, 1 Jan 2005 20:05:08 +0100 |
45 lines |
Re: Durgnat
|
Robert Keser |
Sun, 31 Oct 2004 05:54:16 -0600 |
35 lines |
Re: Conferences
|
Nicola Hopkins |
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 21:11:13 +0100 |
26 lines |