Dear David
what you wrote sounds interesting. but sorry, I think it is because I have not read
Wittgenstein, (or simply lack priori knowledge) I don't understand what you mean.
could you please help me to understand better?
Best Regards
davidsless wrote:
>
> Central to this is language, and our capacity to publicly generate and
> articulate this new thinking.
>
> This brings us full circle back to an earlier discussion of public vs
> private languages and the seminal arguments of the latter Wittgenstein.
>
> I do think his arguments about language are one of the fundamental building
> blocks of design philosophy. Indeed, I would argue (and have done so at some
> length) that Wittgenstein's arguments about language are a special case of
> an argument that can be much more broadly applied to the designed world.
> ........
--
Rosan Chow
Graduate Student
College of Design
North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695-7701
USA
|