Yes Erik - you are right. But I do believe that "an identifier" is
the only definition that makes sense on a consistent basis.
This only became fully clear to me in the last 3 months.
"Jul,Erik" wrote:
>
> Simon:
>
> >
> > It is an *identifier* for an entity or agent.
>
> If that is so, why doesn't the definition read "An identifier of the
> entity..." even as, for Relation, we say "a reference to a related resource"
> and not "a related resource."
>
> At least then we would be saying what we really mean.
>
> --Erik
>
--
Best Simon
|