JISCMail - DC-USAGE Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

DC-USAGE Archives

January 2000

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		DC-USAGE Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Re: Dumb down principles	Diane I. Hillmann	Mon, 31 Jan 2000 11:24:16 -0500	81 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Diane I. Hillmann	Mon, 31 Jan 2000 10:33:15 -0500	82 lines
Re: Vote Summary	David Bearman	Mon, 31 Jan 2000 09:34:29 -0500	39 lines
Vote Summary	Renato Iannella	Mon, 31 Jan 2000 15:37:09 +1000	22 lines
RE: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Rebecca S. Guenther	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:03:36 -0500 (EST)	44 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	schwaenzl	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 18:06:04 +0100 (MET)	27 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	schwaenzl	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:34:16 +0100 (MET)	21 lines
Subject qualifiers	Rebecca S. Guenther	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:31:49 -0500 (EST)	17 lines
RE: Agent-types	schwaenzl	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 16:14:34 +0100 (MET)	18 lines
Re: DCPERIOD - a method of encoding time-periods	Diann Rusch-Feja	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:04:22 +0100	51 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Andy Powell	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 08:00:02 +0000 (GMT)	40 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Simon Cox	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 15:26:40 +0800	103 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Andy Powell	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 07:03:22 +0000 (GMT)	124 lines
Re: Agent-types	Simon Cox	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 11:09:19 +0800	63 lines
RE: Agent-types	Jul,Erik	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:42:52 -0500	24 lines
Re: DCPERIOD - a method of encoding time-periods	Simon Cox	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:26:48 +0800	61 lines
Re: Agent-types	Simon Cox	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:19:53 +0800	63 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Simon Cox	Fri, 28 Jan 2000 09:06:42 +0800	100 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Andy Powell	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 21:48:02 +0000 (GMT)	59 lines
RE: Agent-types	Priscilla Caplan	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:24:34 -0500	52 lines
RE: Agent-types	Jul,Erik	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 10:19:59 -0500	62 lines
Re: DCPERIOD - a method of encoding time-periods	schwaenzl	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:26:26 +0100 (MET)	14 lines
Agent-types	Priscilla Caplan	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 09:23:01 -0500	59 lines
Re: Qualifier principles	Renato Iannella	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 14:47:48 +1000	69 lines
DCPERIOD - a method of encoding time-periods	Simon Cox	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 12:32:01 +0800	58 lines
Re: Ballot edits	Renato Iannella	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 10:56:19 +1000	22 lines
Re: Ballot edits	Renato Iannella	Thu, 27 Jan 2000 10:53:50 +1000	43 lines
Ballot edits	Miller,Eric	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 14:13:26 -0500	87 lines
Re: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Diane I. Hillmann	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:01:03 -0500	78 lines
Dumb down principles	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:53:29 -0500	66 lines
Re: Qualifier principles	John A. Kunze	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 11:36:18 -0500 (EST)	212 lines
RE: #3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:27:18 -0500	86 lines
Re: #3 PS	Diane I. Hillmann	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 09:01:41 -0500	35 lines
Re: #3 PS	Diane I. Hillmann	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 08:43:03 -0500	29 lines
#3 PS	Simon Cox	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:24:33 +0800	44 lines
#3 - proposed Agent-Type category for principles document	Simon Cox	Wed, 26 Jan 2000 16:21:26 +0800	91 lines
USAGE CONFERENCE CALL: Tuesday, Feb 1	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 16:06:54 -0500	22 lines
Some notes on qualifier voting	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:01:35 -0500	42 lines
RE: Simple grammars, RDF, object-types, and the meaning of life.. . ( long)	schwaenzl	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 13:11:24 +0100 (MET)	21 lines
FW: conf call for tuesday	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 06:29:30 -0500	18 lines
conf call info	Priscilla Caplan	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 06:26:26 -0500	16 lines
RE: Simple grammars, RDF, object-types, and the meaning of life.. . ( long)	Carl Lagoze	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 06:09:02 -0500	299 lines
Re: Object-Type/Agent-Type	Simon Cox	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 12:05:57 +0800	83 lines
Re: A child's sense of grammar?	Renato Iannella	Tue, 25 Jan 2000 11:55:59 +1000	44 lines
Simple grammars, RDF, object-types, and the meaning of life... ( long)	Miller,Eric	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:49:10 -0500	150 lines
Re: Qualifier for Language	Rebecca S. Guenther	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:15:52 -0500 (EST)	72 lines
RE: Qualifier for Language	Rebecca S. Guenther	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:08:35 -0500 (EST)	98 lines
Re: Qualifier for Language	schwaenzl	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 19:05:53 +0100 (MET)	31 lines
Qualifier principles	Thomas Baker	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 18:57:49 +0100 (MET)	108 lines
Re: Qualifier for Language	Misha Wolf	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 16:53:50 +0000 (GMT)	70 lines
RE: Qualifier for Language	Miller,Eric	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:20:08 -0500	86 lines
RE: A child's sense of grammar?	Carl Lagoze	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:09:46 -0500	133 lines
Re: A child's sense of grammar?	Diane I. Hillmann	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 09:04:19 -0500	49 lines
A child's sense of grammar?	Thomas Baker	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:56:50 +0100 (MET)	93 lines
Re: Discussion points for next Tuesday	Thomas Baker	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 08:38:48 +0100 (MET)	44 lines
Re: Discussion points for next Tuesday	Renato Iannella	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 15:39:30 +1000	34 lines
Re: Discussion points for next Tuesday	Simon Cox	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:20:40 +0800	53 lines
Re: Discussion points for next Tuesday	Renato Iannella	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 14:15:35 +1000	55 lines
Clarification - Re: Object-Type/Agent-Type	Simon Cox	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:56:27 +0800	92 lines
Re: Object-Type/Agent-Type	Simon Cox	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:09:04 +0800	64 lines
Object-Type/Agent-Type	Renato Iannella	Mon, 24 Jan 2000 13:08:05 +1000	29 lines
Changes in the ballot	Thomas Baker	Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:13:31 +0100 (MET)	36 lines
Re: Qualifier for Language	Rachel Heery	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 21:58:37 +0000 (GMT)	33 lines
Re: Qualifier for Language	Rebecca S. Guenther	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 14:21:49 -0500 (EST)	62 lines
Re: Qualifier for Language	Misha Wolf	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:52:24 +0000 (GMT)	37 lines
RE: Qualifier for Language	schwaenzl	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:39:41 +0100 (MET)	16 lines
Re: Qualifier for Language	schwaenzl	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 18:31:09 +0100 (MET)	27 lines
RE: Qualifier for Language	Rebecca S. Guenther	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:19:18 -0500 (EST)	116 lines
Conf call for Tuesday, January 25	Weibel,Stu	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 10:02:55 -0500	24 lines
RE: Qualifier for Language	Miller,Eric	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:52:47 -0500	104 lines
RE: Qualifier for Language	Rebecca S. Guenther	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:23:24 -0500 (EST)	80 lines
RE: Qualifier for Language	Miller,Eric	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:13:04 -0500	59 lines
Qualifier for Language	Rebecca S. Guenther	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 08:05:47 -0500 (EST)	25 lines
Had to get off call	Carl Lagoze	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 07:28:06 -0500	15 lines
Re: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Simon Cox	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 09:56:36 +0800	82 lines
RE: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Renato Iannella	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 11:31:29 +1000	30 lines
RE: DCT1 has been corrupted!	schwaenzl	Fri, 21 Jan 2000 01:59:54 +0100 (MET)	31 lines
RE: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Andy Powell	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 21:40:32 +0000 (GMT)	39 lines
RE: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Rebecca S. Guenther	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 14:23:49 -0500 (EST)	80 lines
RE: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Andy Powell	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:46:32 +0000 (GMT)	43 lines
RE: "Object-type" and the 1:1 principle - was RE: Concerns regarding DCQBallot document	Andy Powell	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 16:38:43 +0000 (GMT)	46 lines
RE: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Miller,Eric	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:09:45 -0500	36 lines
RE: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Miller,Eric	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:52:53 -0500	66 lines
Re: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Simon Cox	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:17:17 +0800	57 lines
RE: "Object-type" and the 1:1 principle - was RE: Concerns regarding DCQBallot document	Renato Iannella	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:48:37 +1000	34 lines
Re: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Simon Cox	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 10:37:08 +0800	129 lines
Re: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Renato Iannella	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:32:23 +1000	30 lines
Re: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Renato Iannella	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 12:32:23 +1000	30 lines
URI Missing	Renato Iannella	Thu, 20 Jan 2000 11:36:16 +1000	31 lines
RE: More on Process	Miller,Eric	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:40:43 -0500	31 lines
RE: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:23:16 -0500	84 lines
RE: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:19:40 -0500	29 lines
RE: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Miller,Eric	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:17:53 -0500	65 lines
RE: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Miller,Eric	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:13:17 -0500	39 lines
RE: More on Process	Carl Lagoze	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 13:08:45 -0500	83 lines
Re: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	schwaenzl	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:03:29 +0100 (MET)	16 lines
RE: More on Process	Miller,Eric	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:59:26 -0500	59 lines
Don't Panic!	Miller,Eric	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 11:08:12 -0500	40 lines
Re: DC-Usage Conference Call Scheduled for Friday, 2000.01.19	John A. Kunze	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:26:49 -0500 (EST)	30 lines
RE: Concerns regarding DCQBallot document	Miller,Eric	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:02:15 -0500	59 lines
RE: Object types as a qualifier type	Miller,Eric	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 10:02:14 -0500	97 lines
DC-Usage Conference Call Scheduled for Friday, 2000.01.19	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:48:51 -0500	26 lines
Re: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:47:58 -0500 (EST)	58 lines
Re: DCT1 has been corrupted!	Rebecca S. Guenther	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:12:49 -0500 (EST)	42 lines
Re: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Simon Cox	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 19:57:07 +0800	73 lines
Re: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	schwaenzl	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 12:20:49 +0100 (MET)	17 lines
DCT1 has been corrupted!	Simon Cox	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:59:20 +0800	59 lines
Re: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Simon Cox	Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:08:08 +0800	54 lines
RE: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	schwaenzl	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 22:41:04 +0100 (MET)	23 lines
Principles of qualification	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:09:25 -0500	21 lines
RE: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Andy Powell	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:19:45 +0000 (GMT)	62 lines
RE: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 07:08:11 -0500	80 lines
RE: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Andy Powell	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:03:31 +0000 (GMT)	69 lines
RE: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 06:45:56 -0500	43 lines
Re: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	schwaenzl	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:56:11 +0100 (MET)	13 lines
Re: "name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Andy Powell	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 09:39:18 +0000 (GMT)	45 lines
RE: How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Jon Mason	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 16:37:13 +1030	44 lines
"Object-type" and the 1:1 principle - was RE: Concerns regarding DCQBallot document	Simon Cox	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:36:59 +0800	91 lines
"name" is not an element refinement, its an encoding scheme	Simon Cox	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:52:06 +0800	60 lines
How are DD and DMS qualifiers for Coverage??	Simon Cox	Tue, 18 Jan 2000 11:21:01 +0800	56 lines
RE: More on Process	Carl Lagoze	Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:33:06 -0500	42 lines
RE: More on Process	Carl Lagoze	Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:32:57 -0500	277 lines
Availability for a confernece call	Weibel,Stu	Mon, 17 Jan 2000 14:49:38 -0500	27 lines
Re: More on Process	Andy Powell	Mon, 17 Jan 2000 12:18:31 +0000 (GMT)	156 lines
Re: More on Process	Thomas Baker	Fri, 14 Jan 2000 11:22:44 +0100 (MET)	186 lines
Re: More on Process	Simon Cox	Fri, 14 Jan 2000 14:33:52 +0800	49 lines
More on Process	Carl Lagoze	Fri, 14 Jan 2000 01:16:13 -0500	133 lines
RE: Process clarification	Priscilla Caplan	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:48:39 -0500	49 lines
RE: Process clarification	David Bearman	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:06:15 -0500	84 lines
RE: Process clarification	Weibel,Stu	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 09:12:51 -0500	58 lines
Process clarification	Carl Lagoze	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 06:44:25 -0500	22 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 11:25:25 +0100 (MET)	33 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Sigfrid Lundberg, Lub NetLab	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:56:15 +0100 (MET)	53 lines
Re: Object types as a qualifier type	Simon Cox	Thu, 13 Jan 2000 10:05:55 +0800	96 lines
Agents, roles and evolution paths	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:51:07 -0500	27 lines
FW: Concerns regarding DCQBallot document	Carl Lagoze	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:44:20 -0500	152 lines
multiple inclusions in discussion threads	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:42:32 -0500	30 lines
Re: early voting progress and process implications	David Bearman	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:37:00 -0500	65 lines
early voting progress and process implications	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:29:03 -0500	47 lines
RE: Concerns regarding DCQBallot document	Miller,Eric	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 15:24:11 -0500	144 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Priscilla Caplan	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 14:17:24 -0500	27 lines
Object types as a qualifier type	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 08:47:03 -0500	66 lines
Voting system mechanics	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 07:50:12 -0500	16 lines
RE: qualifier approval threshold	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 07:05:25 -0500	49 lines
RE: qualifier approval threshold	Carl Lagoze	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 06:42:13 -0500	35 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Carl Lagoze	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 06:36:57 -0500	67 lines
qualifier approval threshold	Weibel,Stu	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 06:33:23 -0500	16 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Thomas Baker	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:31:20 +0100 (MET)	42 lines
RE: Discussion and Balloting	Thomas Baker	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:21:18 +0100 (MET)	33 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Carl Lagoze	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 06:17:10 -0500	54 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Thomas Baker	Wed, 12 Jan 2000 12:11:16 +0100 (MET)	59 lines
RE: Discussion and Balloting	Miller,Eric	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:58:37 -0500	86 lines
RE: Discussion and Balloting	Carl Lagoze	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 16:10:46 -0500	69 lines
Discussion and Balloting	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:57:01 -0500	38 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Diane I. Hillmann	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:56:48 -0500	74 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Miller,Eric	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:30:09 -0500	62 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Priscilla Caplan	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 15:20:32 -0500	82 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Miller,Eric	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:55:28 -0500	50 lines
Registering and voting	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:39:28 -0500	27 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Carl Lagoze	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:33:01 -0500	38 lines
RE: Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Miller,Eric	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 14:01:25 -0500	26 lines
Balloting is Open for DCMI Qualifiers	Weibel,Stu	Tue, 11 Jan 2000 13:51:18 -0500	92 lines
Ballot	Weibel,Stu	Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:35:51 -0500	30 lines
RE: qualifier approval discussion	schwaenzl	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 23:36:35 +0100 (MET)	16 lines
RE: qualifier approval discussion	Carl Lagoze	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:35:42 -0500	55 lines
RE: qualifier approval discussion	Weibel,Stu	Thu, 6 Jan 2000 17:30:57 -0500	38 lines
qualifier approval discussion	Priscilla Caplan	Thu, 06 Jan 2000 15:20:02 -0500	19 lines

DC-USAGE Archives

January 2000

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives