JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Archives


ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN Home

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN  2000

ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN 2000

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Controls for Testosterone at levels less than 3.0 nmol/l

From:

"John Kane" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

John Kane

Date:

Tue, 15 Aug 2000 09:41:18 GMT1BST

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (52 lines)

> Date:          Mon, 14 Aug 2000 16:25:34 +0100
> Subject:       Controls for Testosterone at levels less than 3.0 nmol/l
> From:          "Grimes, Helen" <[log in to unmask]>
> To:            "'ACBUK'" <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-to:      "Grimes, Helen" <[log in to unmask]>

> We currently use Centaur for male and female testosterone, but lack a
> normal/low female testosterone control level. The ligand controls supplied
> by Bayer only go as low as 3.6 nmol/l. We changed from DPC CAC testosterone
> to Centaur, and note an increase in the number of female elevated
> testosterone, i.e around 3.8-4.0 nmol/l, so either we missed females before,
> or have the wrong reference range (0.2-3.0) or we have interfering
> substances.  Theorists will say we should confirm with extraction methods,
> but who is doing that nowadays? We know our CVS at the low end are about
> 15%, and so feel a lower control would be helpful. Has anyone located such a
> control?
> 

I agree with Mike Diver in that methods for female testosterone do 
not appear to have progressed much over the last 20 or so years. We 
recently transferred our testosterone assay to an automated analyser 
(Abbott Architect) but still use our  extraction method on all high 
female samples (>3.0 nmol/l). Many repeat quite well but there are a  
relatively large number of samples where the extraction method gives 
substantially lower results bring what would have been a worryingly 
high testosterone result back into the reference range. I do not 
think the solution is to increase the reference range for the 
direct assay as you may then miss truly high results. This 
problem occurs to a greater or lesser extent with all direct 
testosterone methods and there has been much debate over the years on 
its cause. As there only appear to be large discrepancies with some 
samples I think that it must be due to interfering substances 
(probably steroid conjugates). 

To get a lower QC pool we have diluted as Mike suggests with hormone 
free serum or you could try horse serum which contains low levels of 
testosterone.


Mr. John Kane
Clinical Biochemistry Dept
Hope Hospital
Salford
M6 8HD

Tel. 0161 787 4374
Fax. 0161 788 7443
Email  [log in to unmask]


%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager