I'd like to ask a question out of complete ignorance: How is "undue weight"
treated in encyclopaedias of a more conventional nature?
That is, would the same thing have happened in, say, a similar article
published in E. Britannica?
Cheers.
Fil
On 16 February 2012 09:33, Lubomir Savov Popov <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> Recently we have had a discussion about Wikipedia sources and how they are
> developed. This article describes the personal experience of an expert on
> the subject matter of one Wiki article. The expert has a history of
> researching the subject matter and has recently published a book. For more
> information, you can see this publication at The Chronicle of Higher
> Education:
> http://chronicle.com/article/The-Undue-Weight-of-Truth-on/130704/
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Lubomir
>
--
\V/_
Filippo A. Salustri, Ph.D., P.Eng.
Mechanical and Industrial Engineering
Ryerson University
350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON
M5B 2K3, Canada
Tel: 416/979-5000 ext 7749
Fax: 416/979-5265
Email: [log in to unmask]
http://deseng.ryerson.ca/~fil/
|