--- Martin Howley <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear Oriens:
> And not even the *complete* hair-underpants since a piece from them
> was
> in the possession of Glastonbury Abbey. (Unless this was another
> instance
> of miraculous reduplication!)
>
And why should it not have been? If Compostella could show the
complete body of St James, and other places could show spare heads,
arms and legs, why should Canterbury have shown the complete
'femoralia', while other places showed portions thereof? It is in the
nature of a relic to be miraculous.
Oriens.
____________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk
or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|