medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
Stan Metheny wrote:
>
> As I wrote to John Briggs offline - there is a difference between
> history of the Office and history of the breviary as an Office
> format. Taft and Matteos focus on the former, not the latter, as do
> virtually all recent/current scholars. Standard works on the latter
> remain Bäumer, Battifol and Baudot (all late 19c, early 20c). Some
> would also add Pierre Salmon (mid 20c).
I think Salmon is writing at the same time as, or just before, van Dijk &
Hazelden Walker - what I am really looking for are reactions to their work
(for or against).
John Briggs
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|