Tom wrote:
>
> Awhile ago, I considered suggesting we refer to the DCMES
> Fifteen as "Dublin Core Classic" (and if unqualified,
> "Dublin Core Lite") but quietly dropped the idea... ;-)
>
> Tom
Well, DC-Lite sounds pretty good to me.
I'm more concerned about what is called "qualified DC"
Lets think for a moment just about dc:description -
and have a short look at
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#string
in particular the note following 3.2.1 string -
Please observe here is not only an issue for
text using human languages, but also for
abstracts of technical stuff, which might
use MathML or CML.
rs
|