Dear Jim,
>Edouard Jeauneau, "Nani gigantum humeris insidentes': Essai d'interpretation
de Bernard de Chartres," *Vivarium* 5 (1967), 79-99.
That's it, of course. Thinish, grey-bound, volume. I can see it now.
I had forgotten the Bernard connection in the title.
Local scholar, as it were; I never met him, though I saw him a few times
around Chartres.
BTW--my _formation_ being more than somewhat ancient and not much supplemented
by keeping up with the literature over the decades--has Richard Southern's
"School of Chartres" article (originally published in his _Medieval Humanism_,
I believe) held up over the years?
Struck me at the time as an exemplary--if somewhat over the
top--debunking of the kind of mythological "layering" which seems to sometimes
characterize some French scholarship, even with its somewhat excessive use of
the devil's advocacy.
Didn't Nichlaus Ha"ring attempt to debunk the debunking?
Was this latter sucessful?
Best,
(Signed: "Lazy in Bloomington")
____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|