JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Archives


MEDIEVAL-RELIGION@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION Home

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION  April 1999

MEDIEVAL-RELIGION April 1999

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: chariot of the church

From:

Otfried Lieberknecht <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Sun, 11 Apr 1999 14:54:54 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (116 lines)

Dear Patricia,

I am coming late to this discussion because of a computer crash and an
absence from Berlin, but maybe I can still offer some belated comments:

>My second question concerns the allegorical configuration of Christ leading 
>the chariot of the Church followed by the 4 evangelists or Church Fathers 
>in the 11oos up through 1210. I have been told about one such image in 
>Dante with Christ as a griffin, pulling the church as chariot followed by 
>the 4 Fathers, but it is too late for my purposes.

In Dante the chariot is accompanied by personifications of all the books of
the Bible, among which the four animals/beings (Ez 1,5ss., Apc 4,6ss.)
representing the four Gospels, whereas the four Fathers of the Church have
no part in this procession. The Griffin pulling the chariot very probably
represents Christ and his two natures, although Peter Armour has challenged
this interpretation (see his _Dante's Griffin and the History of the
World_, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989, for a recent critical discussion see
the relevant pages in John Scott, _Dante's Political Purgatory_,
Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania Press, 1996). Dante's chariot and
procession have been compared with various liturgical, literary and
iconographic precedents (among which also the chariot in Alan of Lille's
_Anticlaudianus_, already mentioned by Christopher Crockett), but from my
occasional and superficial readings of these discussions I did not get the
impression that any precise model or closely matching tradition has been
presented so far.


 Lubac cites a passage 
>from Hugh Metel (1140) along these lines: "Read, reread, and consider, with 
>a recollected memory , the writings of the four evangelists, that is to 
>say, Jerome, Augustine, Ambrose, Gregory. Mount this four-horse chariot, 
>which bears you on high and which will show you the highest pinnacles of 
>knowledge." (v.1; p.16).

Now this is quite dissimilar to Dante's chariot of the Church (in Dante the
chariot has only two wheels and is pulled only by one animal, the binatured
Griffin). The passage in Hugh (which I have not looked up myself) rather
seems to adopt the topos of the "quadriga(e) domini", in its special
variant where the four Fathers of the Church take the place of the four
Evangelists. Normally Christ is imagined as being the "auriga" guiding the
chariot, whereas the Evangelists (or Fathers) are pulling the chariot (and
may also be the wheels). 
This topos has a long and somewhat complicated history to which the
exegesis of the tetramorph (Ez 1,5ss.) and of the chariot of Aminadab (Ct
6,11, cf. Nah 2,4 and 2,13) have contributed. In its relation to the
Evangelists, this topos was quite popular under the influence of Augustine
(e.g., _De consensu evangelistarum, I, 7, CSEL  43, p.10: "Has domini
quadrigas, quibus per orbem uectus subigit populos leni suo iugo et
sarcinae leui" etc.), but I cannot say at the moment at which time it came
to be transferred also to the four Fathers of the Church. Useful
discussions and source references can be found in, for instance, Sibylle
Ma"hl, _Quadriga virtutum: Die Kardinaltugenden in der Geistesgeschichte
der Karolingerzeit_, Ko"ln / Wien: Bo"hlau, 1969 (= Beihefte zum Archiv
fu"r Kulturgeschichte, 9), or more recently in Michael Jacoff, _The Horses
of San Marco and the Quadriga of the Lord_, Princeton UP, 1994.


 Does anyone know about earlier cases, especially 
>with Christ in front and the 4 evangelists/Fathers mounted on horses behind 
>the chariot?

A representation of the four Evangelists or Fathers on horseback would
strike me as very uncommon, and I don't think that I have ever encountered
anything of this kind. Nor do I know of interpretations (or illustrations)
associating the four apocalyptic horsemen (Apc 6,2ss., cf. 19,11) with the
Evangelists/Fathers of the Church. The interpretation of the first
apocalyptic horseman as a figure of Christ, suggested by the parallel in
Apc 19,11, was common at least since the time of Victorinus of Pettau (not
in the wake of Beatus of Liebana, as stated in your second message), but in
this tradition, which came to be a standard for the middle ages, the three
following horses/horsemen were usually interpreted "in malo", as
representing the wars, famines and plagues predicted by his evangelium, or
the "populus sinister", the "falsi fratres" and the "haeretici qui se
catholicos palliant" (Bede), or various moral vices opposed to the 'white'
innocence of Christ (Hugh of St. Victor). Here the three following horsemen
and horses are often said to ride "against" and not only after the first.
When from the 11th/12th century on the apocalyptic seals were associated
with a chronological sequence of "status ecclesiae", the traditional moral
distinction between the first and the three following horsemen was
maintained by referring the latter to the persecutors of the Church and not
to the Church itself.

I don't have Beatus' commentary at hand, yet a detailled interpretation "in
bono" -- evolved probably from less specific remarks in Jerome,
_Commentaria in Esaiam_, XVIII, PL 24,670 (cf. CCSL 73, see also
Cassiodore, _Complexiones Apocalypsis sancti Joannis_, PL 70,1409) -- can
be found in Berengaudus (8th or 9th cent.), _Expositio super septem
visiones libri Apocalypsis_, III, 6, PL 17,813ss.: here all four horsemen
represent Christ, and their horses represent the saints of the time before
the flood (white horse), before the law (red horse), under the law (black
horse), and the prophets of the OT (e.g., David, Elias, Elisaeus)
predicting Christ (fallow horse). It seems not that this interpretation "in
bono" had much success in the following centuries, and it would anyway not
help you to establish a link of identification between the four horsemen
and the Evangelists or Fathers of the Church.

  Otfried

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Otfried Lieberknecht, Schoeneberger Str. 11, D-12163 Berlin
tel: ++49 +30 8516675, fax: ++49 +89 6661792543, [log in to unmask]
  Homepage for Dante Studies: 
http://members.aol.com/lieberk/welcome.html
  Listowner of Italian-Studies:
http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/italian-studies/
  Listowner of Medieval-Religion:
http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------





%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager