Apologies to ted welch and anyone else who found my comments
on Sokal facetious, was actually referring to the netiquette :-) after
'deluded' as hilarious, because I appreciated the gag, etc. anyway,
as far as how they miss the point, Andrew Murphie has said it all.
Was seriously wanting to know if it was Deleuzian or Deleuzian,
guess its just a difference in repetition.
dave.
>It's "deluded" :-)
>
>For more help see "Intellectual Impostures", Sokal and Bricment
>
>Ted Welch
>
>If that book was handed in as an undergraduate essay, it would get 30%
>Not a single quote is integrated, besides which, they miss the
>point in a variety of hilarious ways. ;-}
>
>dave
>
If that comment was made in a seminar it would get )% Try justifying
your claims - in fact they gave a great deal of context and quoted at
length. Do let us join in your hilarity by indicating some examples of how
they supposedly "miss the point".
Ted Welch, lecturer and web designer of http://www.frontlinetv.com
European Society History Photography: http://www.wmin.ac.uk/media/ESHP
Case of sacked CNN producers: http://www.wmin.ac.uk/media/tailwind
David Martin-Jones
Rm 205, Department of Theatre,
Film and Television
The University of Glasgow
Glasgow
G12 8QQ
0141 3303809 ext. 0804
[log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|