It may well do, but what tables.........?
> Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:06:11 -0000
> Subject: RE: Verification of HESES
> From: "Richard PUTTOCK (7472)" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: "[log in to unmask]" <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-to: [log in to unmask]
> Following the concerns raised by Peter Anderson we have checked our
> HESES reports and confirm that we do not believe there are any errors in
> the comparison .
>
> The differences between the data submitted on HESES97 and as shown in
> the sheets is due to a number of adjustments we have made to try and
> reconcile differences in the data.
>
> The adjustments we have made are:
>
> 1 Removing all students in professions allied to medicine, as returned
> in response to Request 97/31, from the fundable category.
>
> 2. Shifted students in sports science and education following the
> review. We have made assumptions about student counts as the data were
> only confirmed in terms of FTEs
>
> 3. Shifted students who were returned in error to price group A last
> year.
>
> I hope this clarifies what these tables are showing.
>
> Richard Puttock
> Analyst
> HEFCE
>
>
_______________________________________________________________
Dr David Belk
Senior Planning Officer
University of Leeds
Tel: +44 (0)113 233 4788
Fax: +44 (0)113 233 4020
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
|