On Thu, 5 Dec 1996, Peter Graham, RUL wrote:
> At some risk of adding to the noise level on meta2, I am forwarding this
> message I got about the use of Publisher Item Identifiers. It shows some
> modes of thought thyat we may (or may not) want to take into account. --pg
PII looks interesting but as it doesn't appear to be a widely deployed
system at present I think this is something we can safely worry about
later. If needs be we can at some point in the future introduce a scheme
qualifier for PIIs in the Publisher element.
Tatty bye,
Jim'll
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Jon "Jim'll" Knight, Researcher, Sysop and General Dogsbody, Dept. Computer
Studies, Loughborough University of Technology, Leics., ENGLAND. LE11 3TU.
* I've found I now dream in Perl. More worryingly, I enjoy those dreams. *
|