JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  February 2017

PHD-DESIGN February 2017

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: When a bias is not a bias, when a weakness is actually a strength

From:

Stephen Matthew Wisniew <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 27 Feb 2017 15:31:38 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (77 lines)

Dear Don, thanks you got me thinking.

Don said, "People are people. We need to accept them the way they are, not
try to make them into what they aren't. Yes, we should understand real
human behavior, but let us not call them biases. Call them human behavior.
And we can design to take advantage of our understanding, thereby making
our designs more easily understood and used by the people we are designing
for."

  I can understand respecting people for the way they are and not to
interpret them incorrectly from experiments by Kahneman and Tversky.
Context matters.
  I don't think we are trying to make people something they are not. In an
economy people exchange for the goods they want or need and often they
exchange for things they desire or have preference. People even buy stuff
they don't want. People have the freedom to choose. I don't think we are
trying to make them into something they are not--the choice is theirs
alone. Entrepreneurs are biased and they have preferences. Entrepreneurs
segment the market to sell to a specific consumer and create a favorable
return on their risk, investment, time, resources, labor, and total costs.
I think entrepreneurs take advantage of their understanding of human
behavior and knowledge of the industry and use it to pull together the
resources (that had alternative uses) to fashion something for the "people
they are designing for". Of course the entrepreneur has forecasted his or
her success to be over and above their possible losses, and proceeds with
their action. When the designs enters the market it may not matter to the
consumer nor the entrepreneur whether the design is more easily understood
and used by the people it was intended.

 On another note about understanding the people you design for, or making
your designs more easily understood:
  A new design, and for simplicity let's call it a new fielding of
equipment. This equipment has an intended purpose. To create a more easily
understood design, you should have training on that equipment to
demonstrate the usefulness, features, and proper use. It probably isn't a
bad idea to discuss safety and safety features. I feel a bunch of designs
are supposed to tell me what they do without any demonstration. Some pop
out of the box with no instructions or demo, and I find that unfortunate. I
think understanding the client or the people we are designing for needs
some more thought regarding customer service and a client relationship
before and after opening the box.

Don said, "The real question is, why do we allow technologists to design
things that transform the very behavior we are good at (curiosity and
attentiveness to change) into something bad and dangerous
(distractibility)."

(I like this question because it's a call to action for better alternatives
in design that harness the best of our human behaviors.)

 Short response: I am not sure we "allow" technologist to do anything. We
can make it hard for them by competing against them with better designs at
a cost preferred by the consumer. I think technologists have the freedom of
action, like an entrepreneur to throw something out there. If the feedback
is that the market will pay and will pay over and above the costs borne to
the entrepreneur, that's success. Production or design will stop when the
entrepreneur goes bankrupt or the product is no longer preferred over other
alternatives. I think there is always an outcome of buyer's remorse or we
got a design that didn't do all we thought it would do, or worse the
product is dangerous and bad for us. The way to stop bad design, is to
design better!


*Stephen Matthew. WISNIEW*
*Entrepreneur*
www.stephenmatthewdesign.com  <http://www.stephenmatthewdesign.com/>
www.linkedin.com/in/stephenmatthewwisniew
business email: [log in to unmask]
Cell Phone: (561) 866-9468


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2024
April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager