MILD DISAGREEMENT
Dear Klaus,
I wholeheartedly agree with and entirely support what you wrote below. That
is why in my other post a few minutes ago, I complemented Terry's
definition by adding, among what I consider professional designers tasks to
be, the very important and yet often neglected concept of 'specifications
to use' by others, as an indispensable complement to 'specifications to
make'.
I only disagree a little bit when you say below that "a law is not a
thing". To me, a law is as well a designed immaterial artifact, often
embedded into various material ones for communication to and enforcement by
others in a given community. At least that is how I see it for now!
Best regards,
Francois
Kigali
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Krippendorff, Klaus <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> in my reading, the posts on this thread respond largely to the problem of
> defining a designer identity in contrast with other identities. i don't
> think this is a useful path.
> (...)
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|