And that is why, for my part, the term 'creativity' is not part of my
expression repertoire. In spite of explanations once provided on this list
on the meaning of the term "creativity".
In my professional work as a designer - at the opposite side of the pure
fine arts artist - EBD outputs are neither anathema nor mere complements.
My purpose is not to 'create' things. for people to enjoy or use as they
can and as they wish. I rather attempt to propose artifacts substantiated
with evident arguments as to their safety, first, and secondarily arguments
convincing of their high qualities both claimed by me and reclaimed by
those intended others, all the five categories of users.
Francois
Kigali, Rwanda
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 5:56 PM, [log in to unmask] <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2016, at 8:20 AM, Filippo Salustri <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> > I wouldn't call EBD "anathema" to a "creative process." I'd call it a
> > "complement.”
> Y’our not wrong! But I have been told many times by other designers I have
> known and worked with, and by design students I have taught that ‘evidence’
> inhibits their creativity. In my little post to the thread I was merely
> acknowledging a point of view I disagree with.
>
> (A preposition at the end of sentence is a symptom of wilful rule
> breaking. Or as Churchill put it “This is the sort of language up with
> which I will not put”.)
>
> David
> --
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|