Also this article, would be of particular interest, it reintrepetates the hunting strategy, from a new investigation of the assemblage:
Grønnow, Bjarne (1987) Meiendorf and Stellmoor Revisited. An Analysis of Late Paleolithic Reindeer Exploitation. Acta Archaeologica, Vol. 56, pp. 131 - 166. (Copenhagen, Denmark).
Jesper S. Østergaard
Hessensgade 22, 2tv
2300 København S
--------------------------------------------
On Thu, 12/3/15, Serjeantson D. <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
Subject: Re: [ZOOARCH] Taphonomy and changes in assemblage interpretation
To: [log in to unmask]
Date: Thursday, December 3, 2015, 2:13 AM
The classic example must
surely be Brain's re-interpretation of Ardrey's The
Hunting Hypothesis about early Man in Africa.
These are the early papers.
Brain, C. K. 1967. Hottentot
food remains and their bearing on the interpretation of
fossil bone assemblages. Scientific Papers of the Namib
Desert Research Station, 32, 1-7.
Brain, C. K. 1969. The contribution of Namib
desert Hottentots to an understanding of Australopithecine
bone accumulations. Scientific Papers of the Namib Desert
Research Station, 39, 13-22.
There is also Brain's later book.
Dale Serjeantson
Archaeology
School of
Humanities
University of Southampton
Highfield
Southampton SO17
1BJ
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/archaeology/about/staff/dale.page
Birds and Archaeology: New Research.
International Journal of Osteoarchaeology Special Issue
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/oa.v24.3/issuetoc
From: zooarch <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
on behalf of Flint Dibble <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Reply-To: Flint Dibble <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Date: Wednesday, 2 December 2015 18:53
To: zooarch <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Subject: Re: [ZOOARCH] Taphonomy and changes in
assemblage interpretation
Hi Kathy,
One
example of an article where a reconsideration of taphonomy
led to new interpretations: Marean and Frey 1997.
"Animal Bones from Caves to Cities: Reverse Utility
Curves as Methodological Artifacts." American
Antiquity
This is a topic
that interests me greatly b/c I am currently writing up a
reinterpretation of the faunal assemblage from Bronze Age
and Iron Age Nichoria in Greece where the taphonomic history
is causing me to reinterpret the initial results. So, please
share any other suggestions you receive!
Thanks,
Flint
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:30
AM, Katheryn Twiss <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
wrote:
Hi:
Thank you! No particular region or time period
at this stage, although she's eventually intending to
work on Malagasy material.
As of right now, I've got the Dart/Brain;
Behrensmeyer, etc.., on hunting vs. scavenging; and
Binford’s Bones.
I also have (thank you,
ZOOARCH, for all of this!) Rich Madgwick's recent work
on UK taphonomy, Marean & Kim on Kobeh Cave, and a
referral to Enghoff's "Viking Age fishing in
Denmark..." Everyone, please let me know if you'd
like me to pass anything along?
These will all be relevant-- and I'm
thoroughly enjoying hearing what people recommend.
I deeply appreciate the email,
and the advice!
Best,
Kathy
Madgwick, R. In Press. New light on feasting
and deposition: Exploring accumulation history through
taphonomic analysis at later prehistoric middens in Britain.
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences.
Madgwick, R., Mulville, J.
2015. Reconstructing depositional histories through bone
taphonomy: Extending the potential of faunal data.Journal of
Archaeological Science 53: 255-263.
Madgwick, R. 2010. Bone modification and the
conceptual relationship between humans and animals in Iron
Age Wessex. In J. Morris, M. Maltby (eds.) Integrating
Social and Environmental Archaeologies: Reconsidering
Deposition. B.A.R. International Series 2077. pp. 66-82.
Oxford: Archaeopress.
Enghoff, Inge Bødker. "Viking Age fishing
in Denmark, with a particular focus on the freshwater site
Viborg, methods of excavation and smelt fishing."
Viking Age fishing in Denmark, with a particular focus on
the freshwater site Viborg, methods of excavation and smelt
fishing (2005): 69-76.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Madrigal, Cregg
<[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
wrote:
Kathy,
The book that really got modern taphonomic
analysis going was C.K. Brain’s The Hunters or the Hunted
on the South African australopithecine sites. There’s also
all the work in the 1980s and 1990s on the hunting vs.
scavenging debate in African paleoanthropology –
especially at the FLK Zinj site. See the works by Kay
Behrensmeyer, Robert Blumenschine, Henry Bunn, and many
others, including Binford’s Bones book.
Are you interested in any
particular region or time period?
Cregg
T. Cregg Madrigal, Ph.D.
Environmental Specialist 3 – Archaeology
New Jersey Department of Environmental
Protection
Municipal Finance and
Construction Element
Mail Code 401-03D
PO Box 420
Trenton, NJ
08625-0420
609-633-1170<tel:609-633-1170>
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
From: Analysis of animal
remains from archaeological sites [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>]
On Behalf Of Katheryn Twiss
Sent: Wednesday,
December 02, 2015 4:34 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: [ZOOARCH] Taphonomy and changes in
assemblage interpretation
Dear All:
I
have a student looking for faunal assemblages whose
interpretation changed significantly once researchers began
to consider their taphonomic histories.
Does
anyone have any recommendations re interesting examples,
please?
Thank you, all! I
appreciate any thoughts you might have!
Best,
Kathy
--
Katheryn C. Twiss
Associate
Professor
Stony Brook University
Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
--
Katheryn C. Twiss
Associate Professor
Stony Brook
University
Stony Brook, NY 11794-4364
[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
|