JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GEO-TECTONICS Archives


GEO-TECTONICS Archives

GEO-TECTONICS Archives


GEO-TECTONICS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GEO-TECTONICS Home

GEO-TECTONICS Home

GEO-TECTONICS  November 2015

GEO-TECTONICS November 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Where to purchase sand for analog modeling - USA

From:

bertrand maillot <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tectonics & structural geology discussion list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:42:35 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (155 lines)

Hello Mustafa,

It's a nice idea you have to dye sands with different grain sizes, but 
it seems ineffective to me.
I have several comments.

Chinese Ink to dye sand works, but it leaks when you wet the sand for 
cutting it at the end of an experiment.
Oxyde powders work much better. They come in various colours, you only 
put a spoon for 2-3 kg of sand
with a little demineralised water, you mix (take gloves !), and you let 
dry for a few days, shaking
from time to time. It takes 10 min. to prepare several kilos, very easy, 
and the oxydes stay on the
grains after wetting.
I buy Oxyde powders in DIY shops or shops that sell cement, sand, 
bricks, because they are usually used
to dye cement, concrete, etc..

The effect of using layers of sands of different sizes may not be 
negligible, it depends on the thicknesses
and on the difference between the sizes, but in any case, it won't be 
large, and it can be interesting,
because sedimentary basins are indeed layered.

I don't know about the effect of the dye on the behaviour of the sand, 
but it is probably very low.

Finally, to avoid to re-sieve the sand, I use layers of natural sand 
(not dyed) separated by very thin
layers of died sand. That way I save dyed sand, have a uniform sand body 
(same grain sizes), and
can recycle the sand without sieving because it is only slightly 
coloured by the thin layers of the preceding
experiment.

Have fun with your students !

Cheers,
Bertrand.


On 19/11/2015 14:20, Mustafa Kaplan wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am a research assistant at METU, Turkey. I am trying to prepare 
> sandbox model for classes. It will be expensive if I order sands from 
> the mentioned web site.   I have collected quartz rich clean beach 
> sand. What i am planning is first sieve and dye them to have different 
> sized and colored sands so that I can physically separate them after 
> using. Does anyone tried dying the sands? I am not sure about the type 
> of dye I should use.
>
> I considered the physical effects of the grain size difference and dye 
> on the model as minimal.
>
> If you have further suggestions, they will be greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mustafa
>
>
>
> Alinti "Resor, Phillip" <[log in to unmask]>
>
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> First of all I want to thank so many for the advice and the 
>> discussions of sandbox modeling.
>>
>> In the end we bought our sand from US Silica 
>> (http://www.ussilica.com/). They have dealers all over the US (even 
>> in CT) so that we didn’t have to pay shipping, which exceeded the 
>> cost of the sand from most other dealers. They have a variety of 
>> products available with data on grain size and sorting. We also 
>> ordered a little colored sand from 
>> www.coloredsand.com<http://www.coloredsand.com/>.
>>
>> Finally, I want to encourage folks to contribute to the efforts of 
>> Kim, Michele and Karen (below) as it would be great to have all of 
>> this information in a central repository, freely available to all. I 
>> think it’s good to get our students thinking critically and 
>> quantitatively about analog models.
>>
>> Happy Modeling,
>>
>> Phil
>>
>> From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list 
>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> 
>> on behalf of Hannula Kim 
>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> Reply-To: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list 
>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> Date: Friday, November 6, 2015 at 10:52 AM
>> To: 
>> "[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>" 
>> <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
>> Subject: Re: Where to purchase sand for analog modeling - USA
>>
>> Phil and others:
>>
>> This discussion reminds me of a workshop held back in May at the 
>> University of Massachusetts, on Analog Modeling of Tectonic 
>> Processes. One of the plans coming out of the workshop involved 
>> putting together a page (or set of pages) on SERC, with information 
>> and resources about teaching using sandboxes (and other analog 
>> models). The Teaching Sedimentary Geology group has a similar set of 
>> pages 
>> (http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/sedimentary/models/why.html , 
>> and other linked pages). Michele Cooke, Karen Leever, and I are 
>> currently working on very rough drafts of content for these pages, 
>> and we would like to include the sorts of things being discussed in 
>> this thread (such as how the choice of grain size or sorting or 
>> roundedness or wetness of sand can affect things like cohesion or the 
>> internal friction angle). We would also link to lab activity 
>> descriptions (like this one: 
>> http://serc.carleton.edu/NAGTWorkshops/structure/activities/121835.html) 
>> that others could adapt to their own courses.
>>
>> If you are interested in contributing to this effort in any way 
>> (contributing lab activities, reviewing content before it goes live, 
>> providing suggestions for materials that are effective for modeling 
>> various types of structures or rheologies, contributing photos or 
>> movies of experiments that you’ve done, etc.), please let me know.
>>
>> Kim
>>
>> Kim Hannula
>> Associate Dean of Arts and Sciences
>> Professor of Geoscience
>> Berndt 301
>> Fort Lewis College
>> Durango, CO 81301
>> 970-247-7463
>> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
Géosciences et Environnement Cergy (GEC)
Directeur
Université de Cergy-Pontoise
5, mail Gay-Lussac, Neuville-sur-Oise
95031 Cergy-Pontoise Cedex, France

Tel: +33 1 34 25 73 59
Site de Neuville, Bureau E407

http://www.u-cergy.fr/fr/~bmaillot
http://www.u-cergy.fr/fr/GEC

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager