JISCMail - GEO-TECTONICS Archives

Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Subscriber's Corner

Email Lists

GEO-TECTONICS Archives

April 2011

View:

Show Author | Hide Author

		LISTSERV Archives
		GEO-TECTONICS Home

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Get Password

Subject	From	Date	Size
Funded PhDs: Fault Analysis Group, University College Dublin	John Walsh	Sat, 30 Apr 2011 20:52:47 +0100	92 lines
short course on GEOMATERIALS - quantitave analysis of microstructures and textures (Prague 30.5.-2.6. 2011)	[log in to unmask]	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 16:18:27 +0200	5686 lines
Gondwana 14 Conference - NEW DEADLINE	Roberto D. Martino	Fri, 29 Apr 2011 08:36:04 -0300	139 lines
Geological Society of London Frontiers Meeting 2011 - The Coupling Between Tectonics and Surface Processes	Christopher Jackson	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:02:27 +0100	55 lines
Re: Gondwana Collision-especial issue	Florencia Gargiulo	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:02:59 -0700	235 lines
Fragile Earth meeting in Munich Sep 4-7 2011: Mantle in 4D and multi-scale basin dynamics sessions	Christian Heine	Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:46:24 +1000	137 lines
Re: Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	S. Sukhotinsky	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 10:11:03 +0300	32 lines
Re: Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	S. Sukhotinsky	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:21:52 +0300	191 lines
Re: Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	Simon Woodward	Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:01:12 +1200	91 lines
Re: position in sedimentary geology	Wintsch, Robert P.	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 21:36:29 +0000	145 lines
Re: Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	ahmed abusharib	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:53:09 -0700	135 lines
Re: Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	S. Sukhotinsky	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:37:56 +0300	34 lines
Re: Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	S. Sukhotinsky	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:37:03 +0300	51 lines
Re: Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	Giulio Di Toro	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 17:29:33 +0200	290 lines
Re: Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	Francesco Mazzarini	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:44:12 +0200	150 lines
Request to review new concept of forces behind continental drift.	S. Sukhotinsky	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:23:13 +0300	46 lines
Call for paper - "Into the deformation history of folded strata"	stefano	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:04:26 +0200	45 lines
Congratulations for your paper	Olivier Galland	Tue, 26 Apr 2011 08:08:59 +0200	42 lines
Gondwana Collision-especial issue	tamer Abu Alam	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:16:31 -0700	900 lines
Invitation to the Session 5 on Shear Zones at the 2011 Gondwana 14 meeting in Brazil	Roberto D. Martino	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:52:19 -0300	286 lines
Re: Northern Spain Field trip.	Jochen Mezger	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:33:15 +0200	135 lines
Re: Northern Spain Field trip.	David Pedreira	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 13:17:48 +0200	176 lines
Re: Northern Spain Field trip.	Rolf Bruijn	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 08:18:53 +0200	233 lines
Northern Spain Field trip.	Wintsch, Robert P.	Mon, 25 Apr 2011 00:31:19 +0000	160 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Curtis, Michael L.	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 16:34:43 +0100	437 lines
Open: Professorship in economic geology in Helsinki	Taija Torvela	Tue, 19 Apr 2011 15:19:38 +0300	321 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Mon, 18 Apr 2011 15:11:36 -0400	260 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Mark P. Fischer	Mon, 18 Apr 2011 09:30:10 -0500	131 lines
Apologies: Re: Abstract for conference in Granada	Domingo Aerden	Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:41:15 +0200	354 lines
Abstract for conference in Granada	Domingo Aerden	Mon, 18 Apr 2011 12:47:52 +0200	264 lines
Pencils and digital field mapping	Roddy Muir	Sun, 17 Apr 2011 16:38:46 +0100	55 lines
Session on : " Hydrocarbons- Nature, Depth and Dynamics"	Jishnu B K	Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:51:46 +0100	48 lines
Re: Structural semantics(plural pedantry)	Professor John R. Underhill	Sat, 16 Apr 2011 11:06:46 +0100	57 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Simon Woodward	Sat, 16 Apr 2011 16:28:26 +1200	153 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Brandon, Mark	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:36:34 -0400	59 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:29:40 -0600	210 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Andy Bobyarchick	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 15:07:36 -0400	145 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Niemi, Nathan	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 14:20:17 -0400	156 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Elisabeth Nadin	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 09:57:28 -0800	79 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	WRChurch	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 13:51:42 -0400	49 lines
Re: Structural semantics(plural pedantry)	Tsvetan Dilov	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:04:10 -0700	33 lines
Re: Structural semantics (plural pedantry)	Hanan Kisch	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:08:06 +0300	141 lines
Re: Structural semantics (plural pedantry)	Hanan Kisch	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 18:48:19 +0300	141 lines
Lecturer in Structural Geology - The University of QLD	Gideon Rosenbaum	Fri, 15 Apr 2011 11:17:12 +1000	170 lines
Re: Field Mapping	Lebit, Hermann D.	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:08:22 -0500	645 lines
Re: Field Mapping	Douwe van Hinsbergen	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:08:13 -0700	244 lines
Re: Field Mapping	Jann Beresford	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:42:00 -0400	184 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Cara Burberry	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 17:32:23 -0500	497 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:20:26 -0600	434 lines
Re: Field Mapping	Hermann Lebit	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:15:43 +0000	41 lines
Re: Field Mapping	Nils Backeberg	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 19:42:06 +0000	31 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Reia M. Chmielowski	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 21:27:14 +0200	40 lines
Re: Field Mapping	Gareth Johnson	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:24:48 +0100	31 lines
Field Mapping	Roddy Muir	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 20:08:53 +0100	25 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	WRChurch	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 14:41:18 -0400	426 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons. in the rain	Pavlis, Terry L	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:05:54 -0600	345 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons. in the rain	Krabbendam, Maarten	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:48:39 +0100	295 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:42:27 -0600	290 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:26:50 -0400	48 lines
Re: Digital geological mapping	wrc	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 09:10:54 -0400	617 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:17:59 -0400	2910 lines
IGCP 597 Amalgamation and Breakup of Pangea	Brendan Murphy	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:44:53 -0300	178 lines
Re: Digital geological mapping	Ian Robert Sharp	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:29:57 +0200	468 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Malcolm McClure	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:23:59 +0100	128 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Viola Giulio	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:22:23 +0200	1062 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Jochen Mezger	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:01:51 +0200	77 lines
Digital geological mapping	Geoffrey Lloyd	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:32:48 +0100	149 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Reia M. Chmielowski	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:07:59 +0200	30 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Richard Holt	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:04:39 +0100	2822 lines
Re: Structural semantics(plural pedantry)	Jean-Paul Liegeois	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:27:14 +0200	136 lines
Re: Structural semantics(plural pedantry)	Professor John R. Underhill	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:44:57 +0100	79 lines
Re: Structural semantics(plural pedantry)	Konstantinos Soukis	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:34:02 +0300	31 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 23:34:50 -0400	2699 lines
Re: Digital geological mapping	wrc	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:08:21 -0400	196 lines
Structural semantics(plural pedantry)	Peel, Frank FJ	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:56:25 -0500	25 lines
Re: Digital geological mapping	Zoe Shipton	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 21:58:35 +0100	173 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	longhinos Biju	Thu, 14 Apr 2011 01:58:19 +0530	3226 lines
Re: Digital geological mapping	WRChurch	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:44:58 -0400	125 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons. Starting th list	Andrew C Newson	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:24:49 -0600	2899 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Deepak Srivastava	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:13:54 +0530	3161 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:53:45 -0600	2422 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:27:48 -0400	4405 lines
Digital geological mapping	Goodenough, Kathryn M.	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:18:57 +0100	79 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Jann Beresford	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:05:27 -0400	2712 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Malcolm McClure	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:00:17 +0100	452 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Jann Beresford	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:51:55 -0400	4462 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:49:27 -0400	2215 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:34:35 -0600	2314 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:28:00 -0400	51 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Macdonald, Professor David I. M.	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:20:31 +0100	178 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Gines, Jorge	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 14:07:56 -0000	435 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Jan Kees Blom - CITG	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 15:53:34 +0200	78 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Solar, Gary	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:46:33 -0400	315 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Cathy Busby	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 08:07:15 -0500	2454 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Malcolm McClure	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 12:42:49 +0100	2341 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Jann Beresford	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 07:30:13 -0400	2562 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Macdonald, Professor David I. M.	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 10:56:33 +0100	2115 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Julia Kramer Bernhard	Wed, 13 Apr 2011 09:40:15 +0200	445 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Elisabeth Nadin	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 19:54:00 -0800	945 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 16:16:07 -0600	390 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Krabbendam, Maarten	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 22:50:36 +0100	370 lines
Special Session: Papers Called for	Jishnu B K	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:56:10 +0100	48 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 07:34:24 -0600	321 lines
Invitation to the Session 5 on Shear Zones at the 2011 Gondwana 14 meeting in Brazil	Roberto D. Martino	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:56:45 -0300	280 lines
Special session at Goldschmidt	Clift, Peter	Tue, 12 Apr 2011 09:00:52 +0100	86 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:20:06 -0400	269 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Andrew C Newson	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:34:42 -0600	357 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Dan Gibson	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:10:56 -0700	300 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:22:19 -0600	257 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Mark P. Fischer	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:46:00 -0500	240 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Dave Whipp	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:12:30 -0300	307 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Malcolm McClure	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 15:06:40 +0100	289 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Mark P. Fischer	Mon, 11 Apr 2011 08:54:23 -0500	128 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Pedro Castiñeiras	Sun, 10 Apr 2011 12:28:19 +0200	79 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:59:33 -0400	592 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Elisabeth Nadin	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:29:00 -0800	606 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	wrc	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:50:28 -0400	446 lines
PDF of complete discourses	John Whalley	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:38:24 +0100	91 lines
Page 11: Predictions	John Whalley	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:37:52 +0100	575 lines
Page 11: Predictions	John Whalley	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 22:36:56 +0100	59 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Gregory Dumond	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 12:20:28 -0500	116 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Alan Gibbs	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 18:05:32 +0100	199 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Ryan Shackleton	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 17:29:28 +0100	199 lines
Re: GEO-TECTONICS Digest - 6 Apr 2011 to 7 Apr 2011 (#2011-64)	WILKINSON M.	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:51:33 +0100	11227 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Marco Foi	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 08:48:49 +0200	312 lines
Page 10: Outline for a new understanding	John Whalley	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 06:54:27 +0100	777 lines
Goldschmidt2011: The Role of Island and Continental Arcs in Continent Formation	Barnes, Jaime D	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 21:34:58 -0500	141 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Jyotindra Sapkota	Fri, 8 Apr 2011 11:15:14 +1000	183 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Bruce Trudgill	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:17:24 -0600	155 lines
combined replies	John Whalley	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 22:13:43 +0100	440 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	John Wakabayashi	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:13:41 -0700	419 lines
Re: new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Jochen Mezger	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 18:03:30 +0200	210 lines
new thread: high tech field geology--pros and cons.	Pavlis, Terry L	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:36:14 -0600	102 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Alan Gibbs	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:33:34 +0100	262 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Denis Gapais	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 15:59:36 +0200	182 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Mike Cunningham	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 06:48:00 -0700	65 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Mark Jessell	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:40:48 +0100	42 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Jochen Mezger	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 14:39:41 +0200	76 lines
Re: Page 9: Strain is not a physically meaningful term	Ake Fagereng	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 13:57:21 +0200	210 lines
Re: Page 9: Strain is not a physically meaningful term	Oliver, Nick	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 04:24:02 -0700	217 lines
Re: Thanks for information on softwares for drawing geol maps and sketches (Toshi)	Malcolm McClure	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:07:31 +0100	79 lines
Page 9: Strain is not a physically meaningful term	John Whalley	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 11:57:09 +0100	409 lines
Thanks for information on softwares for drawing geol maps and sketches (Toshi)	Toshihiko Shimamoto	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 19:40:10 +0900	32 lines
Invitation to the special session on oroclines at the 2011 Gondwana 14 meeting in Brazil!!	Gabriel Gutierrez-Alonso	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 12:21:28 +0200	271 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Bobyarchick, Andy	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 05:53:12 -0400	123 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Alan Gibbs	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:34:21 +0100	97 lines
Re: GEO-TECTONICS Digest - 5 Apr 2011 to 6 Apr 2011 (#2011-63)	Goodenough, Kathryn M.	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:57:39 +0100	1890 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	MCCAFFREY K.J.W.	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:52:50 +0100	96 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	[log in to unmask]	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 09:43:42 +0200	141 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Mattila Jussi	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 08:17:34 +0300	63 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Pavlis, Terry L	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:48:20 -0600	59 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Andrew C Newson	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:11:52 -0600	187 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Malcolm McClure	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 23:04:16 +0100	26 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	John F. Dewey	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 21:29:09 +0100	107 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Umberto Fracassi	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:28:22 +0200	87 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Gregory Dumond	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:16:25 -0500	44 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Bobyarchick, Andy	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:02:52 -0400	226 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Pavlis, Terry L	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:22:03 -0600	178 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Dirk Nieuwland	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 21:12:41 +0200	209 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Andrew C Newson	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:21:14 -0600	159 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Kenneth Hickey	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:02:35 -0700	167 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Andrew C Newson	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 11:20:22 -0600	128 lines
Re: Good software for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Lebit, Hermann D.	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:04:09 -0500	107 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Pavlis, Terry L	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:17:18 -0600	141 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Pavlis, Terry L	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:13:06 -0600	92 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Peel, Frank FJ	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 09:53:38 -0500	77 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Pavlis, Terry L	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:30:39 -0600	125 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Julia Kramer Bernhard	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 16:11:25 +0200	112 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Lebit, Hermann D.	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 08:36:47 -0500	84 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Freddy Corredor	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 13:03:21 +0000	196 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Jose A. Álvarez Gómez	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:35:46 +0200	245 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Pavlis, Terry L	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 06:33:48 -0600	70 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Nils Backeberg	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:24:18 +0200	223 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Julia Kramer Bernhard	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:19:38 +0200	105 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Scott Bryan	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:15:42 +1000	61 lines
Re: Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	dirk nieuwland, NewTec	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:03:18 +0200	62 lines
Good softwares for drawing geological maps and outcrop/texture sketches? (Toshi Shimamoto)	Toshihiko Shimamoto	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 15:27:29 +0900	42 lines
Page 8: Why the stress theory is wrong, and why this matters so much	John Whalley	Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:06:54 +0100	438 lines
Encouraging students	Alan Gibbs	Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:55:43 +0100	263 lines
Posted on behalf of Guido Gosso	John Whalley	Tue, 5 Apr 2011 10:39:20 +0100	1382 lines
Fall AGU Tectonophysics session proposal deadline - April 20th	Becky Flowers	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 16:48:10 -0600	52 lines
Re: PhD studentship - Modelling the thermal structure of onshore Ireland and its offshore basins	John F. Dewey	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 19:00:28 +0100	65 lines
PhD studentship - Modelling the thermal structure of onshore Ireland and its offshore basins	David Chew	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 17:47:09 +0100	405 lines
IGCP597 Amalgamation and Breakup of Pangæa: the type example of the supercontinent cycle	Schofield, David I.	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:35:38 +0100	233 lines
PhD fellowships in Simulation of Earth System processes in Potsdam / Berlin, Germany	Karen Agneta Leever	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 12:54:08 +0200	554 lines
Re: DRT 2011, 31 Aug-2 Sept, Oviedo, Spain	Paul Stenhouse	Mon, 4 Apr 2011 11:33:41 +1000	146 lines
Posted on behalf of John Underhill	John Whalley	Sun, 3 Apr 2011 11:31:43 +0100	5583 lines
Re: Special Session: "Solar Cycles, Earthquakes and Climate."	longhinos Biju	Sun, 3 Apr 2011 07:00:52 +0530	189 lines
Page 7 - Classification of physical processes (repeated)	John Whalley	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 22:31:10 +0100	467 lines
Re: Special Session: "Solar Cycles, Earthquakes and Climate."	Jurgen Kraus	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 13:21:38 -0600	78 lines
Special Session: "Solar Cycles, Earthquakes and Climate."	Jishnu B K	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 18:54:58 +0100	70 lines
Re: Short course announcement	Virginia Toy	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 16:57:20 +1300	284 lines
DRT 2011, 31 Aug-2 Sept, Oviedo, Spain	Sergio Llana Funez	Fri, 1 Apr 2011 16:08:46 +0200	135 lines

GEO-TECTONICS Archives

April 2011

Options

Subject

From

Date

Size

JiscMail Tools

RSS Feeds and Sharing

Search Archives

Archives