JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  July 2015

PHD-DESIGN July 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

SV: Re: Discussions and critique of evidence-based practice

From:

Birger Sevaldson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 16 Jul 2015 13:37:20 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

This thread has taken off, i should have been more intelligent than starting it right before going on a holiday trip, now being forced to reply from my phone. All evidence shows that this would happen.

Appologies for spellos and being less polished.

I should have replied to many of you even to some misreadings of my post, due to my own fuzzyness.



At least most of you got that i didnt want to start a discussion pro et contra evidence as such but some wrestling around the idea of our composit common ground. What role and place would different types of info, knowledge, practices, skills and talents have within this common ground where evidence based design has a natural place as well as composition.



But the most important issue that has constantly bothered me is the very notion of evidence. To me evidence is about something being proofed beyond reasonable doubt. I think blurring this requirement, beyond reasonable doupt, renders the notion irrelevant.



EBD is proposed as something other and better than what normal designers do. It is portraied by people on this list that designers who do not submit to the EBD paradigm are irresponsible, sloppy, and lesser designers. I was seriously attact and yelled at by a person on these grounds. I simply do not recognise this abyss between what all serious designers i can think of do and EBD, except there is a difference in weighting types of information. Most designers i can think of are doing investigations that include information from various sources, some being evidence beyond reasonable doupt but most being other types of information, spanning from cultural interpretation, cases that are too few to remove doupt but are judged to be valid, patterns and experiences as also Don listed. Now it seems to me that the EBD movement tells us to shift attention from more or less valid sources to evidence beyond reasonable doubt.



If i am wrong about this and EBD has a much wider definition of evidence as some people in this thread propose i think most of us are practicing EBD and have done it for years, so whats the fuzz?



Others have said in this discussion that designers do not evidence their design outcome. If we accept the notion of evidence i use this is a ridicoulous claim since there is normally no way to generate evidence beyond reasonable doubt from one design case. This also indicates that people have a very fluffy conception of the notion of evidence. Also this discussion thread has shown this. There are many such indicators so i really think my confusion and following question is justified.



So my big problem is not evidence as such but that i am totally bewildered about how people on this list and especially EBD proponents use the term. As far as i know the volume of EBD is from a very narrow application area where the production of evidence is easier then normally in design.



It would be very good if we could agree on the "beyond reasonable doubt definition". I think that would clarify a lot. And it would stop the idea that evidence can play a dominating role in the information poole because a great deal of the information would be judged not as evidence but to different degrees of validity and handled with care accordingly.



I asked before what constitutes evidence in EBD. I didnt get much clarity then. Does this clear and sharp definition help? Ken asked me a long while ago what i think constitutes evidence. I never got back to an answer because i entangled in the most complex considerations. Here is my simple stupid answer: beyond reasonable doupt. Now it is fair to ask the EBD proponents what are you guys actually talking about when talking about evidence?



My last point: being critical to the EBD paradigm is not the same as being pro slopyness and against evidence. Im not. I simply want to discuss its role in the pluralistic common ground of design



Sendt fra min Sony Xperia™-smarttelefon





-----------------------------------------------------------------

PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>

Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design

Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design

-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager