JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  May 2015

PHD-DESIGN May 2015

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Newspaper Article & Comments on Canadian Design

From:

Gunnar Swanson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 2 May 2015 19:36:43 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (40 lines)

It's easy to see why someone would see the Graphic Designers of Canada's "open letter" as merely whiny. It said that "contests like these are unethical, detrimental to students, to professional graphic designers, and to Canada in general" without a real explanation of what ethical standards were violated. 

Although I'm sure that the intent was to repeat the "detrimental to" claim but putting quotation marks around "winner" could easily be construed as disparaging a 19 year-old girl. It complains that "the 'winner' of this contest. . . did not receive due compensation for their time or intellectual property" but most people (apparently including Ariana Cuvin, the author of the mark) would see $5K to be reasonable compensation for a second year student's project.

Certainly, the case that "all those who participated" were insufficiently compensated is easier to make. The $5000 prize divided by 300 participants made the average compensation less than $17. Presumably, the organizers of the contest would point out that it was a public contest for students rather than a professional arrangement per se. Various organizations (including design societies) organize contests where the entrants neither ask for nor receive compensation.

As the "point man" for offers of competitions and uncompensated projects for my university  program's students, I spend a lot of time discouraging design competitions. I do find them insulting to designers and the design profession but I don't think my hurt feelings will (or even should) move anyone. I try not to assume ill will on the part of those who propose competition or "a chance to add to their portfolios." I think most such offers are naïve rather than willfully malicious and exploitive. 

As Sarah Rosenbaum points out, the short-circuiting of the dialog that normally takes place during such projects is bad for the client, the designer, and the resulting designed object. I suspect that, as she indicated, most such offers are the indirect result of people not knowing what they want and hoping that they will "know it when they see it" as US Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart claimed about pornography. (I'm reminded of Ralph Caplan--many of you may know his book 'By Design: Why There Are No Locks on the Bathroom Doors in the Hotel Louis XIV and Other Object Lessons'--who said that clients often say "I know what I want to say but I can't put it in words." Caplan said he always asks "What have you got it in now?") A professional designer is like a corporate psychiatrist; clarifying intent is as much or more part of the design process as is creating the object.

Furthermore, such contests often result in a winning entry with technical problems requiring reworking for use, resulting in extra expense and sometimes in disputes about authorship or proper interpretation. More importantly, I would hope that a professional designer (or a design student allowed dialog with the client) would get across the message that a mark is not a brand identity by itself.

It is clear to me that graphic design professionals should not engage in speculative work. This is for business reasons, not because of an ethical prohibition. In fields such as advertising and architecture, contests either make the prize worthwhile or compensate all entrants. It is rare that a graphic design competition results in more than the fees that would have been reasonable for a designer who was contracted for the job. Gambling when the winnings can only equal the value of the bet is a chump move.For a student, the choice is not as clear.


Gunnar

Gunnar Swanson
East Carolina University 
graphic design program

http://www.ecu.edu/cs-cfac/soad/graphic/index.cfm
[log in to unmask]

Gunnar Swanson Design Office
1901 East 6th Street
Greenville NC 27858
USA

http://www.gunnarswanson.com
[log in to unmask]
+1 252 258-7006


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager