JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for GEO-TECTONICS Archives


GEO-TECTONICS Archives

GEO-TECTONICS Archives


GEO-TECTONICS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

GEO-TECTONICS Home

GEO-TECTONICS Home

GEO-TECTONICS  August 2014

GEO-TECTONICS August 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

GV Mapper VS Fieldmove

From:

Roddy Muir <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Tectonics & structural geology discussion list <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:11:26 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (264 lines)

Hi Julie,

We've not played with GVMapper, but for obvious reasons we cannot comment on the quality of a product from another vendor.

FieldMove for tablet pc's is a cut-down version of Move which has been optimized for use with a stylus on a Windows machine. If you have a powerful tablet (e.g. a Microsoft Surface Pro, Panasonic ToughPad, Xplore etc.) then you can take the whole of Move into the field with you.

FieldMove Clino is our smartphone app (scales up to the iPad and iPad mini, but not Android tablets) which is essentially a digital compass clinometer with a built-in notebook and camera. The data is displayed on a basemap of your choice. The app is free, but if you pay for the pro version then you get a bigger library of symbols, a stereonet, and in the iOS version you can draw lines and polygons on your map.

We would regard the Windows stylus interface used by FieldMove (for tablet pc's) and GVMapper as yesterday's technology. Many of us have been hoping to see significant improvements in the hardware and the operating systems over the past few years, but this has not happened. However, the latest developments in Touch screen tablets from Apple and the Android manufacturers are very encouraging. We are currently building and testing a new mapping app that has been built on a better platform for Touch Screen devices - still a bit of work to do here, but it's looking great.

I would encourage you to have a play with the Pro Version of the FieldMove Clino app (US$20), or FieldMove for tablet pc's (free to academics) if you prefer to use a stylus and Windows interface. We regard both as entry points for Move which is a very rich model building environment. I think you will find that the software is sufficiently flexible to cope with whatever geological sector you are working in.

We are always keen to receive feedback on our products, so I hope you will be in touch.

Best regards

Roddy Muir
Managing Director
________________________________
Have you upgraded FieldMove Clino to FieldMove Clino Pro? 
For more information: www.mve.com/software/fieldmoveclino
Download from these app stores: 

   

Midland Valley Exploration Ltd.
2 West Regent Street
Glasgow G2 1RW
United Kingdom
T: +44 (0) 141 332 2681
F: +44 (0) 141 332 6792
E: [log in to unmask]
W: www.mve.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Julie Rowland
Sent: 27 August 2014 23:15
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: GV mapper versus Fieldmove

GV Mapper has an english version. The workflows looked really good with easy movement between map and sections. It appears to be very flexible in terms of project set-up. At under USD3000 + 800 per year maintenance for the professional version it seems like a pretty good option. But obviously fieldmove academic is free. As someone who works on mineral and geothermal systems I was concerned by your comments about the limitations with Fieldmove. But, I am not sure if GV mapper is better, though I suspect it is.  Comments from anyone familiar with GV Mapper would be much appreciated.

JR

Dr Julie Rowland
SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92109
Auckland
1004
New Zealand
________________________________________
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Pavlis, Terry L [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, 28 August 2014 9:57 a.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: GV mapper versus Fieldmove

In all honesty, that is the first I had seen GV mapper.  It looks interesting, although my bad Spanish made it a bit of a challenge to figure out exactly what all the capabilities of the software were.  Hopefully someone will chime in?
Terry

-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Julie Rowland
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: GV mapper versus Fieldmove

Hi all - going in a slightly different direction. Terry, thanks for the great info on your link. Have you or anyone else compared GV mapper, from GEOVECTRA,  to Fieldmove? I liked what I saw of it in Chile and wondered if someone familiar with both digital mapping options can comment.

JR

Dr Julie Rowland
SCHOOL OF ENVIRONMENT
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92109
Auckland
1004
New Zealand
________________________________________
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of JONES R.R. [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, 28 August 2014 8:50 a.m.
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Suitability of iphones as digital compass-clinos -- scary observations

Just to follow-up on Terry's comments, and to reiterate some of our own findings that I posted a few months ago ...

We have carried out quite a lot of systematic testing of the suitability of iPhones as compass-clinos for measuring geological planes - and we have experienced very mixed results.

From our point of view, the good news is that ...
(1) we have managed to get good, repeatable results that are approximately as precise as a set of analogue compass-clinos (Silva liquid filled housings, double spirit-level, no electronics).
(2) once we're up and running, using an iPhone is much quicker than any analogue compass-clino we've used; so ideal for taking large numbers of measurements from a single sampling site (e.g. fracture transects).
(3) we've now taken many, many thousand measurements with iPhones that we believe are within acceptable precision.

The bad news is that ...
(1) if we're not very rigorous in setting-up and calibrating the devices, we usually get randomly bad results.
(2) even if we are very careful, the iPhones sometimes don't self-calibrate properly - so we always cross-check the iPhone against an analogue compass-clino before and after a measurement session.
(3) there's no obvious way of examining the device itself to see whether it's likely to be functioning correctly - you must have another device with which to compare it.

So personally, I'm extremely sceptical of the general validity of any orientation data that have been collected with smartphones - unless the user has documented their calibration procedure carefully, and that the calibration has not relied wholly of the device's own calibration [... or until someone has documented why this isn't necessary].
Based on this, I'd also recommend that any orientation data that are published (or form the basis for interpretations that are published) include a statement on the equipment and method used.

... Of course, perhaps implicit in the above is an assumption that the old non-digital compass-clinos that we've used for years are universally precise, accurate and reliable beyond doubt - which really isn't the case at all.

If we get chance soon, myself and/or colleagues will document all the results of our iPhone testing and put into the public domain, so that it's not just ad-hoc comments on a discussion list. Sorry not to have done it already.

Richard


----------------------------------------------
Richard Jones, Managing Director
Geospatial Research Ltd.
Office Suite 7, Harrison House,
Hawthorn Terrace
Durham DH1 4EL, UK
http://www.geospatial-research.com/
----------------------------------------------



-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pavlis, Terry L
Sent: 27 August 2014 20:07
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Functionality videos for FieldMove Clino--scarey observation

For what it is worth, we did a little experiment at an Earthcube workshop 3 weeks ago.  Poorly controlled experiment in that we didn't force people to calibrate their devices.  Even with that disclaimer though, the results were very very sobering.   I think we tested 7 or 8 devices; a couple iphones and a bunch of android devices.  There was a spread of about 60 degrees in strike measurements with none closer than 5 degrees of the known orientation (using standard analog compass, which was also confirmed with a "geoclino device"--not geoclino software on a phone, the pricey Japanese device).  Not sure what this means since the experiment wasn't well controlled, but it definitely fits what Midland Valley has been telling us, which is "know your phone".  It seems the sensors are basically useless in some of these devices, whereas others can be quite good.  Depends on how lucky you are with your device?
Terry Pavlis

-----Original Message-----
From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Andrea Billi
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 12:23 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Functionality videos for FieldMove Clino

Roddy,

I join Julia with the same problems and errors.

Thanks in advance for your advice.

Ciao
Andrea





Julia Kramer <[log in to unmask]> ha scritto:

> Hi Roddy,
>
>
>
>
>
> do you have any comments/ suggestions on the hardware side for your 
> compass app? Neither my nor my colleague's iphone 5S or ipad mini 
> produce any reliable measurements. With my ipad mini it is especially 
> the northern quadrant that is off by as much as 40 degrees, whereas 
> dip directions towards other cardinal directions are quite accurate.
> The iphone is completely useless. I have read that it might be a 
> device-specific software problem that is currently being reviewed by 
> Apple, but maybe you have already gathered some experience on top of 
> what is described in terms of device calibration in your user manual.
>
>
>
> Any advise would be highly appreciated!
>
>
>
> Thank you and kind regards,
>
> Julia
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dr. Julia Kramer Bernhard
> Senior Consultant (Structural Geology)
>
> SRK Consulting
> Oceanic Plaza, 22nd Floor, 1066 West Hastings Street Vancouver, BC, 
> Canada V6E 3X2
> Tel: +1 604 235 8574
> Mobile: +1 778 995 5330
> Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>; skype:
> Julia.Kramer.Bernhard www.na.srk.com<http://www.na.srk.com/>
> www.linkedin.com/in/juliakramer
> ________________________________
> From: Tectonics & structural geology discussion list 
> [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Roddy Muir [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 6:25 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Functionality videos for FieldMove Clino
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Just a quick note to let you know that we have released four short 
> videos explaining how to set up a project, collect data, view and edit 
> your data and then export your project from the FieldMove Clino app.
>
> The links to the four films can be found on the FieldMove Clino page 
> on the Midland Valley website:
>
> http://www.mve.com/software/fieldmoveclino
>
> We hope that you find these useful.
>
> Roddy Muir
> Managing Director
> ________________________________
> Have you upgraded FieldMove Clino to FieldMove Clino Pro?
> For more information:
> www.mve.com/software/fieldmoveclino<http://www.mve.com/software/fieldm
> oveclino>
> Download from these app stores:
>
> [cid:image001.jpg@01CFC202.C27BF360]<https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/fieldmove-clino/id647463813?mt=8>   [cid:image002.jpg@01CFC202.C27BF360]
> <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.mve.fieldmove.clino
> >
>
> Midland Valley Exploration Ltd.
> 2 West Regent Street
> Glasgow G2 1RW
> United Kingdom
> T: +44 (0) 141 332 2681
> F: +44 (0) 141 332 6792
> E: [log in to unmask]
> W: www.mve.com
> [cid:image003.jpg@01CFC202.C27BF360]
>
>



_________________________________________________
Andrea Billi (PhD)
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, IGAG, c.o. Dipartimento Scienze della Terra, Sapienza Università di Roma, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185, Rome, Italy.

Phone: +39 06-49914955
Skype: a.billi
Email: [log in to unmask]
Web site: http://www.andreabilli.com
Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/andreabilli68/
_________________________________________________

Dalla Costituzione della Repubblica Italiana Art. 9: "La Repubblica promuove lo sviluppo della cultura e la ricerca scientifica e tecnica."
Art. 33: "L'arte e la scienza sono libere e libero ne è l'insegnamento."

"Non è grave il clamore chiassoso dei violenti, bensì il silenzio spaventoso delle persone oneste." Martin Luther King



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager