JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-MAPS Archives


LIS-MAPS Archives

LIS-MAPS Archives


lis-maps@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-MAPS Home

LIS-MAPS Home

LIS-MAPS  April 2014

LIS-MAPS April 2014

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Request to scan our first edition OS maps

From:

"Fleet, Christopher" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for issues related to map & spatial data librarianship <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:56:55 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (71 lines)

Tinho,

Just a few thoughts on this. 

You haven't said whether you are intending to provide access via the web to the scanned images, but this would seem to me to be a desirable outcome?

Often in the past when libraries have been approached by companies wanting to scan their maps, there seems to have been an assumption or agreement that the only access to the images would be via the companies' own products, whatever these are. This need not be the case, provided the company can still sell a product and the library can still provide access. As you say, I think in your case that its important that Liverpool University retains IPR over the images, and is allowed whatever use you would like to make of them in the future, even if it may have to be limited in some way in order to allow Digital Archives to make a return on their investment. I realise that in some cases, external funding of scanning may be an end in itself for income generation, and libraries may decide to delegate all future access to the outputs through commercial channels, but this is less good for the man on the street, and I think the income generated may not be large in the long-term.

I think its good too to consider the whole workflow from recording of sheet metadata, handling, scanning, and then the outputs in the form of web-based access, zoomable images, georeferencing, etc. Usually, external companies may only want to fund one part of the process, such as the scanning, but the related processes would ideally all take place for a better outcome.

Whilst the appropriate resolution is debatable, I'd suggest 400 dpi at an absolute minimum, and 600 dpi if you can. The One-Inch is finely engraved, and although at 600 dpi your images will be larger, they would have a much longer-term value.

I don't know too whether you can use Roger Hellyer's provisional carto-bibliography of the One-Inch at http://www.charlesclosesociety.org/files/OldSeriesCarto.pdf to help with metadata? Roger kindly allowed NLS to use a fuller Word version of this for our recent scanning of the One-Inch Revised New Series, that saved us time. This may also help with access to the maps in the future, and understanding of particular states, etc. CCS have very kindly made available sheet lines for the One-Inch too at: http://www.charlesclosesociety.org/KMLFILE that could be useful for online access.

If helpful, I'd be very happy to chat further on these things or share info on our map digitisation in NLS.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for issues related to map & spatial data librarianship [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Oliver, Richard
Sent: 09 April 2014 17:53
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Request to scan our first edition OS maps

If this is the 'Liverpool' set of the Old Series to which I was introduced by the late J.B. Harley, then it is a 'good 'un' and well worth someone's scanning it! But provision of some sort of introductory note might be a condition of use.

Richard Oliver
________________________________________
From: A forum for issues related to map & spatial data librarianship [[log in to unmask]] on behalf of Cartographics [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 09 April 2014 11:03
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Request to scan our first edition OS maps

Tinho,
The Digital Archives Association produce good quality scans of useful maps at a reasonable price.  I doubt that there is any commercial profit involved.
My only comment is that their CDs have no introduction or descriptive text and the user has to make his own judgement about the history and context of the contents.  This will be a particular problem with the one-inch Old Series maps where there are many later states with the publication date unchanged.
Richard Dean


On 08/04/2014 17:49, Da Cruz, Tinho wrote:
Dear friends,
I've been approached by a Warrington-based company who'd like to scan our first edition Ordnance Survey one-inch maps.  The company is the Digital Archives Association and describes itself as 'a small group of amateurs producing high resolution images of historical maps on CD and DVD.'
 This is their website: http://digitalarchives.co.uk/ They sell to local history and genealogy enthusiasts.

I thought I'd ask this group's advice regarding digitisation projects from outside commercial companies. Being new to this sort of thing I'm minded to tread carefully.

What would we get out of it? A digital copy of our maps. The knowledge that we've helped make some old maps more accessible.
Concerns: care of the maps as they are taken away to scan. Copyright of the images made.

Any comments or thoughts?
Best wishes
Tinho
.............................
António da Cruz (Tinho)     [log in to unmask]<[log in to unmask]" target="_blank">http:[log in to unmask]>
Map Curator,
Department of Geography and Planning, School of Environmental Sciences, Roxby Building, University of Liverpool, LIVERPOOL  L69 7ZT
Telephone:  0151 794 2844
Fax:  0151 794 2866
Please note: I do not work on Monday afternoons or Thursday afternoons.

     If half the world knew how the other strives
     'Twould spoil the comfort of their easy lives.
From: Innes Juvenlie Library, The Cries of London or Pretty Moving Market, London, c.1800
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook

National Library of Scotland, Scottish Charity, No: SCO11086

This communication is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the addressee please inform the sender and delete the email from your system. The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of National Library of Scotland. This message is subject to the Data Protection Act 1998 and Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002. No liability is accepted for any harm that may be caused to your systems or data by this message.

www.nls.uk 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager