Ken
You still don't get it! You fail to understand the intent and ignore the more accurate statement you stimulated. You seek to apply rigid standards of reference to something you don't appreciate. You do so in an offensive domineering way and then call the response rude. (It was sarcastic and mean't to underline the excessiveness and inappropriateness of your criticism. It also sought to underscore the fact that you can not identify a comparative theory, just a list of unintegrated references for which you make no explicit case.) I am surprised that you had no comment about the definition of intuition I offered or the hard science on insight I referenced. Did you really read the paper?
Oh well. I guess I react to insult just like you do. Maybe that is what we share,
Chuck
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------
|