JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  April 2013

PHD-DESIGN April 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Ideas and definitions of what is "a design" in a broad sense

From:

Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 5 Apr 2013 19:08:25 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (466 lines)

yes, mp,

i couldn't agree with you more about the general notion of design, including the cultivation of vegetation. but i still think we should be aware of and focus explicitly on the meanings a design has for their stakeholders and assure to the best of our ability that it be beneficial to target communities without disenfranchising non-users. without the latter qualification, our proposals could serve oppression. without a concern for meaning, it would not come to use. but that use has also to be justified in terms of its larger consequences. i don't think engineers and farmers have the knowledge or interest in addressing the larger cultural/ecological issues of what they are doing.  mind you that profits from reckless use of non-renewable resources and large scale farming has caused much damage to the very ecology we humans live and ultimately die with. in the u.s. we currently have a debate on gun control. it is clearly against the interests of gun manufacturers to consider the hazardous consequences of the wide spread availability of guns. designers certainly should consider all the consequences of their proposals before making them, even refuse designing harmful technology .

i am certainly happy that you seek to broaden the scope of design.

best wishes

klaus

From: Ranjan MP [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 2:43 PM
To: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Cc: Klaus Krippendorff; Ranjan MP
Subject: Re: Ideas and definitions of what is "a design" in a broad sense


Dear Klaus

I included that part of nature that I believe are mediated by human actions and prolonged selective practices of culture formation, sometimes over centuries of action and existence of social practices, beliefs and preferences. The plants and vegetables that we cultivate are all products of such sustained design action. According to Claude Levi Strauss many of our vegetables come from the Mayan civilization and in our study of the bamboo crafts of the Northeast of India for our book Bamboo and Cane Crafts of Northeast India (1986) we found evidence of selective cultivation of particular bamboo species by local communities so that these could be used for extraordinary applications that could support their preferred lifestyles and meet sustainable practices in theior rural settings. I have reflected on this particular aspect in my paper titled "Ecology and Design: Lessons from the Bamboo Culture" (1991 Oita, Japan) and you can download the text from this link here as a pdf file
<http://tinyurl.com/d32a5f7>

In this paper (1991 Oita, Japan) I have a definition of design and I quote it here for immediate reference
I quote

Design: An Alternate definition
When I use the term 'design', I do not wish to refer to design as an elitist preoccupation but to design asa developmental activity, a powerful tool for economic and social development. The development of this definition of design represents the current state of art in the area of design as a discipline as we now see it in India and in our perception this interpretation can be used to improve the quality of our lives. Design as a multi-dimensional process and design as a strategy are quite different from the more commonly understood definition that covers the limited roles that designers play in the service of organized industry. Design as a discipline necessarily draws on a vast body of human knowledge that are appropriate to the task at hand to generate the scenarios that could be subjected to rigorous evaluation. design activity focusses on the user's needs.
UnQuote

With warm regards

M P Ranjan
from my Mac at home on the NID campus
6 April 2013 ar 12.10 am IST

-------------------------------------------------------------
Prof M P Ranjan
Design Thinker and author of blog - www.Designforindia.com<http://design-for-india.blogspot.com/>
E8 Faculty Housing
National Institute of Design
Paldi
Ahmedabad 380 007 India

Tel: (res) 91 79 26610054
email: ranjanmp@g<mailto:[log in to unmask]>mail.com<http://mail.com>

blog: <http://www.design-for-india.blogspot.com<http://www.design-for-india.blogspot.com/>> (current and with downloads)
education blog: <http://www.design-concepts-and-concerns.blogspot.com<http://www.design-concepts-and-concerns.blogspot.com/>> (archival)
education blog: http://www.visible-information-india.blogspot.com<http://www.visible-information-india.blogspot.com/> (archival)

------------------------------------------------------------

On 5 April 2013 22:36, Klaus Krippendorff <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
yes, MP,



this is an eloquent definition of design. since you include nature in the process, this may well include random mutations. as i mentioned in the semantic turn, the very pleasure in introducing changes without intentions for a particular outcome can sometimes yield something that survives cultural selection. (but you might say that you include this possibility is part of opportunity minus the "for what").



i wonder if this elegant generality is too helpful.



i prefer to relate a definition of design to what professional designers (should) do. therefore, i like to:

*         distinguish everyday design, which humans engage in everyday life, but largely for themselves, and professional design, which is design for others.

*         focus design for others on making sense to those affected, being meaningful, usable, valuable, which is encapsulated by being human-centered and cultural sensitive. this qualification does not deny engineering, chemistry, even ergonomics, as involving design activity in the general sense, although rarely self-affirmed as such, and indeed indirectly benefitting other people, but not drawing on knowledge of human users and their cultures. to me the latter are central concerns for professional designers.

*         invoke designer's accountability - without claiming general ethical principles, which always favor established elites - to those affected by the interventions they invariably cause. designs should always (a) benefit the community of their stakeholders and users, (b) minimize unintended and undesirable constraints along other dimensions of their lives, and (c) not harm or disable communities of non-users.



i don't see a conceptual conflict between the kari-hans' larger definition, and tim's more individual approach, but i do think it is necessary to focus professional designers on what they are good at, where they can make knowledgeable contributions, and for which they are appreciated.



klaus



-----Original Message-----
From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] On Behalf Of Ranjan MP
Sent: Friday, April 05, 2013 3:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Ideas and definitions of what is "a design" in a broad sense


Dear Kari-Hans



Interesting question and position.



For me a "Design" is a response to an opportunity or challenge. A product of some agency human or natural. (animal architecture)


These could be deeply thoughtful and skillful (think and do) responses or intuitive ones (do and think - if at all) or even accidental or emotional responses, the incidental response (the great India *Jugaad*) or much worked through multiple iterations and trials (professional design) or (plodding and boring 'design' and scientific research as in molecule finding algorithms in the biotech space).



"Design" as a result of human agency is visible all around us including the trees and plants in our landscape through selective breeding and cultivation. The intangible cultural norms and social practices too are "Design" manifestations in culture and society. Laws, policies and business models as well as processes and events are "Designs".



So, we have objects - parts and wholes, communications - elements and messages, spaces and structures and systems, environments and eco-systems all manifestations of design, cultures and social norms.


Arjun Appadurai gives us the concept of social imaginary which could give us a rich description of design - ethnoscapes, mediascapes <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediascape>,

technoscapes,

financescapes, ideoscapes.

<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arjun_Appadurai>



All humans and other actors contribute and it would be an interesting space for serious research.



With warm regards



M P Ranjan

from my Mac at CEPT University

5 April 2013 at 1.00 pm IST



-------------------------------------------------------------
*Prof M P Ranjan*

*Design Thinker and author of blog -

www.Designforindia.com<http://www.Designforindia.com><http://design-for-india.blogspot.com/<http://www.Designforindia.com%3chttp:/design-for-india.blogspot.com/<http://design-for-india.blogspot.com/>>>

*

E8 Faculty Housing

National Institute of Design

Paldi

Ahmedabad 380 007 India



Tel: (res) 91 79 26610054
email: ranjanmp@g <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>mail.com<http://mail.com>



<http://www.ranjanmp.in/>blog: <http://www.design-for-india.blogspot.com>

(current and with downloads)

education blog: <http://www.design-concepts-and-concerns.blogspot.com>

(archival)

education blog: http://www.visible-information-india.blogspot.com (archival)


<http://www.visible-information-india.blogspot.com/>

------------------------------------------------------------





On 5 April 2013 11:37, Kommonen Kari-Hans <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>>wrote:



> Dear Tim,

>

> It is clear that we have a different idea of design (as a phenomenon).

> For you, design requires the agent and intention, you do not think

> designs exist without that relation with the agent, and you prefer

> that design researchers focus on the designing by the specialists -

> this is what I infer from what you said. This is not all you said and

> not the essence, but key points where I think we think differently.

>

> I think that design is something that various evolutionary processes

> create, and that in this grand evolutionary scheme of things, humans

> are a very special species among organisms that has the capability to

> design consciously and intentionally (other species also create

> designs, and even make specific new tools to match a new need, but

> humans are in a different league). This has made a cultural evolution

> possible, which produced our human culture, which includes a lot of

> intentional as well as emergent design (designs that form the structures, processes, etc, of culture).

>

> Within this extremely large phenomenon of design, professional

> designers and their activities form a fairly small special case of the

> design phenomenon, albeit a very important and influential one. As the

> field of design has at its core a specialist expertise of designing to

> practice, reproduce and develop further, it is clear that it mostly

> focuses on that specialist idea of design. However, my belief is that

> that "other" design has increasing significance in society that also

> design experts and the society would probably do well to recognize and

> consider as something that belongs to the design phenomenon, as

> opposed to being outside of it or something that is "non-design".

>

> The phenomena in this field of "other" design are not ignored

> completely, they are of course tackled in many ways by other

> disciplines and also discussed by the field of design, but typically

> without considering it as a kind of design. I feel that it is useful

> to find ways to apply similar conceptual tools for both the specialist

> design and these other kinds of design. Which is something that I feel

> Papanek, Cross, Nelson and Stolterman and Krippendorff and some others

> do, in their own way, maybe with some other conviction and intentions compared to mine.

>

> All in all, I feel it is a useful exercise to try to understand what

> are the characteristics of that design (the phenomenon), and as part

> of that endeavor, I am trying to think about what kinds of designs

> (the design of the thing, not the thing itself) are being created in

> those processes. But it is interesting that even in the field of

> specialist design, there are few definitions of what "a design" is,

> and apparently, few needs to engage in that; for most it is enough to engage in defining what "designing" is.

>

> cheers, KH

>

> ----

> On Apr 5, 2013, at 2:10 AM, Tim Smithers wrote:

>

> > Dear Kari-Hans,

> >

> > Thanks for your reply!  I hope you won't mind if I respond some.

> >

> > You're interested in

> >

> >  "...  how to describe designs that have emerged without an

> >   intentional designer ..."

> >

> > and say that

> >

> >  "... it is useful in many situations to think about

> >   intentionally designed designs and emergent or

> >   unintentionally produced designs in the same way, because

> >   they all have their effects and consequences in the world,

> >   regardless of where they came from."

> >

> > I would say designs don't emerge, intentionally or unintentionally,

> > and designs can be described in any way someone (an agent) finds

> > useful.  Anything can be place in a design role by an any agent--a

> > thing that can do designing or not.  So, in my way of thinking about

> > what a design is--anything placed by an agent in the design

> > relation--is as inclusive as they come.  Agents, things like us, can

> > put anything they like in this role, whenever they like, for

> > whatever reason they like.  There's no stopping this, not with good

> > reason, at least.

> >

> > But may be I'm confused about what you're interested in?

> > Things (and stuff) don't have "effects and consequences in the

> > world" because they are designs.  They have effects and consequences

> > because they are things or stuff.  Things don't have to be designs

> > before they can have effects in the world.

> >

> > So, are you trying to divide the world (or Universe) of things and

> > stuff in to Natural things and stuff, and things and stuff that

> > arise from agent actions?  And you want to use the word design to

> > distinguish the two kinds?  If so, why is this interesting for a

> > better understanding of designing?

> >

> > Accepting that I may be confuse about your aims here, I'd still take

> > exception to the way you talk of evolution.

> >

> > Evolution does not produce designs.  It gives rise to things that

> > can be considered as designs--put in the design relation by an

> > agent.  Remember, no agent, no designs.  And evolution is no agent!

> >

> > Evolution doesn't produce cats, human beings, cells, eyes, viruses.

> > It's a Natural process (a complicated one) that gives rise to things

> > we (agents!)  call cats, human beings, cells, eyes, viruses, etc.

> >

> > So, when you ask "... how can/should we define that design?"

> > are you asking how are the forms and constructions of these

> > things--cats, human beings, etc--to be described?  Or are you asking

> > how they are designed?  Evolution, in my view, does not do any

> > designing.  And, in my way of thinking, since we can place anything

> > we like in a design relation (to us) we also get to chose how we

> > describe the thing when considered as a design, rather than as a

> > particular thing.

> >

> > Being a design is not a property or quality of something.

> > It's a role that something can be given by an agent.  A role the

> > something can be given no matter how it came to be (and do, of

> > course).

> >

> > As I say, my sense is that I'm not understanding well what you're

> > trying to do and why.

> >

> > Best regards,

> >

> > Tim

>

>

> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>> Discussion of PhD

> studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at

> https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design

> -----------------------------------------------------------------

>





-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]><mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>> Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design

-----------------------------------------------------------------


-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager