JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  April 2013

PHD-DESIGN April 2013

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Brand Name into PhD Document

From:

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:06:55 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (58 lines)

Dear Vincent,

Since you’ve asked a question of this nature on the list, I’ll give you the answer I would give to anyone at my own university if someone were to ask me. I hope this does not seem too blunt, but you’ve asked a serious research question and this is a responsible answer.

The first part of the answer to your question has to do with the context. As I understand your question, you are a PhD student who has already completed a series of experimental or quasi-experimental activities. You are now at the point of writing up your activities for your thesis.

It is difficult to understand how you have come to the point of writing up your research before discussing an issue of this kind with your supervisor. You should review your research procedures, methods, and methodology with your supervisor before you begin to do the work.

For a PhD student to jump into lab work or conduct experiments before reviewing plans with a supervisor can require a PhD student to rework the methods and procedures. In the worst case, it can require an entirely new project. At the least, it raises questions about the literature review – if you had done a literature review, some of the issues involving the use of a brand name would have likely been discussed, and you’d have a model of past practice on which to rely or from which to depart.

The second problem involves ethics clearance. It seems that you have been working with human beings. If you have gone over all aspects of the project with a supervisor and with your university ethics committee, I would have thought that someone would have caught this question in managing the ethics review. I am not familiar with regulations on ethics in France, but in Australia, any project involving human beings from a simple survey or questionnaire to a laboratory simulation requires an ethics review.

Finally, there is the nature of the expertise you need to answer the questions you are asking. The PhD at Le Laboratoire Conception de Produits et Innovation at ENSAM is a PhD in industrial engineering. This particular issue involves aspect of design research that touches on the social sciences. If your supervisor at ENSAM is an engineer, you should have conferred with a social scientist to explore the dimensions of this question.

That said, I have a short answer.

You are where you are in the process. I don’t know how much you have done on your own and how much supervision you have received. I don’t know your university regulations concerning experimental work with human beings, but the EU has a significant body of law governing different forms of research. You should not undertake human experiments of any kind without reviewing the rules with your supervisor and the appropriate university committee to gain approval. In the course of explaining your methods, someone should have offered advice on any questionable aspects of your process.

Ethics clearance is a matter of law in every nation. What we think about how each university manages the ethics clearance process may be open to discussion, but everyone must respect the laws of each jurisdiction. If you used brand names for the experiment, that would be an aspect of ethics clearance, and this issue should have been considered.

That leads to the final answer: if using specific brand names was part of your experimental or quasi-experimental process, you are obliged to report them in your thesis. If this somehow “contaminates” your results, the contamination is a laboratory factor and not a matter to decide now. Since I know nothing about the project, I’m not saying that this did “contaminate” the process. I am saying that whatever happened must be reported.

You introduced brand names to influence the thinking and behavior of the human beings who took part in the experiment. If there was no influence, you must report it. If there was an influence, you must report it. For this purpose, it may not be necessary for you to gain permission from the brands whose trademarked names you used. If permission is required under European or French law, you must get permission.

Some years ago, a colleague of mine needed to use a specific film script for a thesis. It took half a year of letters and telephone calls with negotiation and signed permissions to get an approved copy of the script and the right to use it and quote from it. That was her project and that’s what she needed to do.

The same thing often applies to people who wish to use copyrighted or trademarked images, or brand names.

For your research project, you have already used the brand names. Since you used them to materially and conceptually influence your participants, your report will in some respect reflect this fact. To withhold a factor that influences how people conceptualise their activities and how they behaved will skew your results. Withholding this information will raise serious problems for the thesis.

My suggestion is that you meet with your advisor or with the director of your laboratory. Talk these issues through and see what you can do at this point to examine and clarify the issues.

Solving these problem may be simple, or they may not. Either way, this is an issue that requires expert advise from some who can review with you the specific details of your project.

Good luck with your work.

Ken

Ken Friedman, PhD, DSc (hc), FDRS | University Distinguished Professor | Swinburne University of Technology | Melbourne, Australia | [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> | Mobile +61 404 830 462 | Home Page http://www.swinburne.edu.au/design/people/Professor-Ken-Friedman-ID22.html<http://www.swinburne.edu.au/design>    Academia Page http://swinburne.academia.edu/KenFriedman About Me Page http://about.me/ken_friedman

Guest Professor | College of Design and Innovation | Tongji University | Shanghai, China

Vincent Rieuf wrote:

--snip--

I've been working on in-lab experiments on design activities which are piloted by fictive breifs. I found it important to include in the breif a client represented by a popular brand names like Nike, Nesspresso... so that the designers could associate themselves to a set of values, invested markets and brand identity. However now that I am explaining my document and writting about my experiments, I wonder if I should name the brands in the document. I do not whish to advertise them nor name them without their permission and I feel that my research work should not be tainted by any brand.

--snip--



-----------------------------------------------------------------
PhD-Design mailing list  <[log in to unmask]>
Discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design
Subscribe or Unsubscribe at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/phd-design
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager