On 09/04/2012 04:28 PM, Curt Cloninger wrote:
> Bishop's essay seems very tautological. It goes something like this:
> Art recognized as worthy by the mainstream art world (a "world" implicitly and vaguely understood by the readers of artForum) is worthy by definition.
> The mainstream art world has not recognized a lot of this work (which work? can't say, it's not recognized) as worthy art.
> So let's take a crack at exploring what's wrong with this work.
It's the just artworld fallacy.