 |
 |
On 09/04/2012 04:28 PM, Curt Cloninger wrote: > Bishop's essay seems very tautological. It goes something like this: > Art recognized as worthy by the mainstream art world (a "world" implicitly and vaguely understood by the readers of artForum) is worthy by definition. > The mainstream art world has not recognized a lot of this work (which work? can't say, it's not recognized) as worthy art. > So let's take a crack at exploring what's wrong with this work. It's the just artworld fallacy. - Rob.