JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives


LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives

LIS-PUB-LIBS Archives


LIS-PUB-LIBS@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-PUB-LIBS Home

LIS-PUB-LIBS Home

LIS-PUB-LIBS  August 2011

LIS-PUB-LIBS August 2011

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: National reference resources and national catalogue

From:

Chris Booty Information & Learning Services Development Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Chris Booty Information & Learning Services Development Manager <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 31 Aug 2011 14:25:35 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)

We have found that careful and selective use of social media (mainly Twitter and Facebook) is a useful way to promote online resources especially when able to aim them at people who will re-tweet to their own communities, or to draw on topical issues to make a link.  One major advantage is that your audience are web-savvy types who will not need convincing that online services are something they want to use. Just one example - a recent tweet about the COBRA online business resource resulted in 39 click-throughs in 24 hours.

 Some of the suppliers are also making good use of social media to spread awareness of the products - Credo being the outstanding example of good practice.



On the wider issues David is quite right. We certainly made the switch from printed resources to online because it represents a better way to spend our money and potentially gets that information to many more end users than would otherwise be the case. It was also because we believed that this represented a better way of delivering quality up-to-date information. There can't be many authorities where the range of titles available is not going to be reduced in the present situation so we may be moving further away from a standard national offer rather than closer, as the selection becomes more disparate rather than more cohesive.



 

Chris Booty

Information & Learning Services Development Manager Adults, Health & Community Wellbeing: Libraries Goldlay Gardens, Chelmsford, Essex CM2 0EW

 

Essex County Council

email: [log in to unmask]

 



-----Original Message-----

From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Lynn Osborne

Sent: 31 August 2011 12:21

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: National reference resources and national catalogue



In the SW we use a shared website www.cyberlibrary.org.uk hosted by Plymouth

City Libraries, to bring together information in the region on all the

online resources available to library users in their own authority.



SWRLS has paid for flyers promoting the site, which double up as a simple

joining form, which are widely distributed, including via FE colleges, some

of whom have included them in their induction packs for new students.



For ideas on promotion, it is also always worth contacting the resource

suppliers who will often provide free posters etc as well as holding

training sessions which provide ideas for increasing usage.



As MLA and Arts Council England have, I believe, just posted a tender notice

for a third Framework Agreement for Reference Online content for English

public libraries, it would be nice to think that promotion would be one of

the requirements?





Lynn Osborne

Director, SWRLS

Website: www.swrls.org.uk 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----

From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

On Behalf Of Ken Chad

Sent: 31 August 2011 12:02

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: National reference resources and national catalogue



Thanks David



Thanks for unpicking the complexity...

The Guardian article (on online resources) reported that: 'Two years ago

Brown's team ran a mystery shopping exercise in Enfield and found that about

30% of the library staff had no idea what was available or did not know how

to find it, and some did not even realise that users only needed their

library card numbers to access the information.' I'd be surprised if Enfield

was unique-- so to answer your question 'where do we go from here?' it seems

addressing that issue would be a good place to start. Maybe a couple of

other 'next steps' could be.....

 

(1) If 30% of *library* staff don't know I guess perhaps what...90% (more?)

of the public don't know. So how about identifying the coverage of maybe

just one or two widely understood (by the public) resources (Britannica and

OED?). That should be easy. It looks to me that a very high percentage

(80%?) of the UK population has free access to these resources through their

local (doesn't have to be a national service per se)  library entitlement. 

(2) Find out about the public awareness of this resource...What percentage

of the public know they can access those resources for free?



I'd be happy to help out on (1) by setting up an open to all, simple to edit

table on LGLibTech. Maybe some people could help gather the data? 



Maybe (2) has already been done? Anyone know? I asked a few (ok actually 6)

people this morning when I was out and about in my local High Street

*Nobody* knew they had free access entitlement. A couple were truly *amazed*

and delighted this was provided free by the library. In times when libraries

are doing all they can to publicise their value to communities this seems

such a simple and effective message ... 



Ken

Ken Chad Consulting Ltd

Tel +44 (0)7788 727 845. Email: [log in to unmask] 

www.kenchadconsulting.com

Skype: kenchadconsulting   Twitter: @KenChad

Open Library Systems Specifications:  http://libtechrfp.wikispaces.com







-----Original Message-----

From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]]

On Behalf Of David Tanner

Sent: 31 August 2011 10:35

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: National reference resources and national catalogue



Hi Ken

The situation, as you would expect is complex. We (public libraries)

subscribe to what we can afford. There are various online resources that my

authority does not subscribe to, not because they aren't any good, or

wouldn't be used but because we don't have the funds. When online resources

started to become available we like many others switched funding from hard

copy to online (eg Britannica). But you eventually reach the point where

your budget can't support any more online resources without a massive

injection of funding - not going to happen in the present climate. Some

authorities have already unsubscribed from Britannica due to poor usage and

low usage of online sources is a concern.

There is also the thorny issue of who has remote access to what nationally.

In theory we have the nascent basis of a national library membership (the

SCL scheme). In practice most of our online sources (including eBooks) are

required to be geographically restricted to "our" users  (go define!). I

have anecdotal evidence of members of local family history/local history

groups finding backdoor ways to join other library authorities to use the

online resources they provide and we do not.

So.... where do we go from here? 



-- 



David Tanner

Manager: Stock and Systems

Adult and Community Services (Information)

North Yorkshire County Council

Library HQ

21 Grammar School Lane

Northallerton

North Yorkshire

DL6 1DF

Tel: 01609 533814

Fax: 01609 780793

email: [log in to unmask]

 

At the moment I am reading 

"Any Human Heart" by William Boyd.





>>> On 31/08/2011 at 10:10 am, in message

<030d01cc67bd$ce393fc0$6aabbf40$@com>,

Ken Chad <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The Guardian has picked up the (somewhat old news) about the combined

> Regions/OCLC UK national catalogue initiative

> http://lglibtech.wikispaces.com/National+Catalogue. It set me thinking

about

> national access to online *reference* resources

> 

>  

> 

> The (already in existence) *Welsh* National Catalogue -'Cat Cymru' -also

> includes links to online reference resources. Looking at individual UK

> library websites it seems most (all?) have free online access to some

great

> resources such as Encyclopaedia Britannica, OED and lots more. 

> 

> Does anyone know what percentage of the UK population has free online

access

> to say Britannica? Is it universal for UK public libraries to offer this?

> Have I missed this data? Do CILIP, MLA, CyMAL, SLIC know? Have any of the

> library campaigns been promoting the fact that libraries give *everyone*

(or

> whatever the statistic is) free online access to......' Have I missed

that?

> Maybe this information is something we could share in the Local Government

> Library Technology (LGLibTech) wiki?

> 

>  

> 

> An article in the Guardian back in may reported on Enfield's work to

promote

> these resources

> 

> 'Enfield boosts digital reference role. London borough has trained staff

to

> increase public's use of online reference sources'. By Mark Say Guardian

> Professional 25 May 2011

> 

>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/government-computing-network/2011/may/25/enfield-d



> igital-refence-library-staff-training-increases-usage

> 

>  

> 

> It reported: 'Most local authorities now have a portfolio of digital

> reference sources, most coming at a cost beyond the pockets of the regular

> library user, but there is evidence that they are not widely used. Brown

> says that over the past five years the Enfield Library Service has built

up

> a range of digital resources - including encyclopaedias, the legal

database

> LexisNexis Butterworths and the Lexis Direct business information database

-

> but several were not being widely used. In some cases there were less than

> 100 searches a year on resources that cost thousands of pounds, which was

> poor value for money'

> 

>  

> 

> Is that situation general?

> 

>  

> 

> Ken

> 

> Ken Chad Consulting Ltd

> 

> Tel +44 (0)7788 727 845. Email:  <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

> [log in to unmask]   <http://www.kenchadconsulting.com/>

> www.kenchadconsulting.com 

> 

> Skype: kenchadconsulting  Twitter: @KenChad

> 

> Open Library Systems Specifications:   <http://libtechrfp.wikispaces.com/>

> http://libtechrfp.wikispaces.com 

> 

>  

Access your county council services online 24 hours a day, 7 days a week at

www.northyorks.gov.uk.



WARNING



Any opinions or statements expressed in this e-mail are those of the

individual and not necessarily those of North Yorkshire County Council.



This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and solely

for the use of the intended recipient. If you receive this in error, please

do not disclose any information to anyone, notify the sender at the above

address and then destroy all copies.



North Yorkshire County Councils computer systems and communications may be

monitored to ensure effective operation of the system and for other lawful

purposes. All GCSX traffic may be subject to recording and/or monitoring in

accordance with relevant legislation.



Although we have endeavoured to ensure that this e-mail and any attachments

are free from any virus we would advise you to take any necessary steps to

ensure that they are actually virus free.



If you receive an automatic response stating that the recipient is away from

the office and you wish to request information under either the Freedom of

Information Act, the Data Protection Act or the Environmental Information

Regulations please forward your request by e-mail to the Data Management

Team ([log in to unmask]) who will process your

request.



North Yorkshire County Council.



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature

database 6424 (20110831) __________



The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.



http://www.eset.com





 



__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature

database 6424 (20110831) __________



The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.



http://www.eset.com

 





  Click https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/CAgiCbXidIjTndxI!oX7Um3TMWn3KSUYm7zoAYL8gAIyLlko61mnHXTl5FEI8sVQIOZxgo3cdrMeaPLWGci2!g==  to report this email as spam.





This email (including any attachments) is intended only for the recipient(s) named above.  It may contain confidential or privileged information and should not be read, copied or otherwise used by any other person unless express permission is given.  If you are not a named recipient, please contact the sender and delete the email from your system. It is the recipient's responsibility to ensure that appropriate measures are in place to check for software viruses. 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager