I meant Hi and not Hy
:0)
On 01-06-2011 12:02, Meghan Kelly wrote:
> Hi Miles and Nicolas,
> Working in a different discipline, I had a tendency to assume a difference in academic level through the name.
>
> For example, in the same context there are a number of names for Visual Communication Design such as Communication Design, Visual Communication and Graphic Design. In this instance the name Graphic Design has been adopted more in the TAFE sector in Australia (Technical and Further Education) whereas Visual Communication Design, Communication Design and Visual Communication as a name has been adopted more by the University Sector. This change has been progressive in an attempt to differentiate the courses and what they deliver. In this vein, without knowing the courses or where they are offered, I would have positioned Product Design in the TAFE sector and Industrial Design in the University sector.
>
> Regards
> Meghan
>
>
>
>
> _________________________________________
>
> Meghan Kelly
> Visual Communication Design Honours Coordinator
> Deakin University
> Faculty of Arts& Education
> School of Communication& Creative Arts
> 211 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Victoria 3125
> Phone: 03 9244 6332
>
> Deakin University CRICOS Provider Code 00113B
> ________________________________________
> From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Nicolas Maffei [[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 7:56 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Whats' in a name - Industrial Design or Product Design
>
> Hi Miles,
> Might be worth talking to staff at the Royal College of Art, as they have had courses called Industrial Design Engineering and Design Products. Both of which are variations on the terms you are interested in. But, imply that these terms are inadequate and other more diverse and distinctive terms are needed
> Of course there is writing on the terminology of design, esp. the difference between design, craft and art (Lees-Maffei in The Journal of Design History; Paul Greenhalgh, Peter Dormer, Culture of Craft) and Raymond Williams Keywords.
> I wonder if the term 'industrial' seems anachronistic and was dropped for this reason in terms like Design Products and Product Design. On the other hand, it survives in terms like the culture industry, which is used as an all encompassing phrase, esp. in higher education.
> This is a great question. I'm looking forward to the responses.
> Nic
>
> Dr. Nicolas P Maffei, PhD (RCA)Senior LecturerSchool of DesignNorwich University College of the Arts Francis House 3-7 Redwell Street Norwich
> NR2 4SN
> tel +44(0) 1603 610561 fax +44(0) 1603 615728 [log in to unmask]
>
>
>
>> Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 15:26:54 +1000
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Whats' in a name - Industrial Design or Product Design
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> Hi all,
>> Is anyone aware of any scholarly writing about the preference for the use of the terms 'Industrial Design' or 'Product Design' or otherwise - be it to describe professional practices, educational programs and regional differences? There appears to be a number of posts on such matters on various design forums, and these opinions are important, but is there any work out there that addresses the specifics of each, maps or compares what each term may mean and its differing perceptions in various contexts or locations?
>>
>> Miles
>>
>> Dr Miles Park
>> Program Director | Industrial Design
>> Faculty of the Built Environment | University of New South Wales | Sydney NSW 2052 | Australia
>> [log in to unmask]
>> Location: Room 4042 Red Centre
>> T +61 0(2) 9385 4853 | F +61 0(2) 9385 4270 | M 0432 784 997 | Skype milespark
>>
>> http://idsydney.posterous.com/
|