Hi *
On Nov 4, 2010, at 23:48 , Maarten Litmaath wrote:
> When the FQAN is just "/vo" we could let lcg-info-dynamic-scheduler
> automatically add a VOView for "VO:vo" besides the one for "VOMS:/vo",
> probably with the sum of all the jobs for the various "VOMS:/....."?
>
> What do you think?
This is probably okay, there is a bit more information needed, having to do with the way the dynamic scheduler works.
Reading all of this thread, I suspect that what we need is a revamp of the attached very old document. Note that the names on this doc are all from Nikhef, but that is only because it's a summary document we constructed, which is summarizing a large body of other information. Some of the people responsible for what was summarized are Sergio Andreozzi, Salvatore Monforte, Gian Luca Rubini, Andrea Sciaba, Simone Campana, Marco Cecchi, Vincenzo Ciaschini, Andrea Ferrarro, Antonia Ghiselli, David Groep, Francesco Giacomini, Alessandro Italiano, Dietrich Liko, Davide Salomoni, and Steve Traylen (many of whom were in the EGEE Job Priorities Working Group).
The issues that Stephen brought up are briefly illustrated in section 2; the way that the dynamic scheduler mapping works is described in section 5. The modification needed to do "inclusive" reporting described in section 4 was never implemented. It sounds like we have not made too much progress in "VOMS grand unification" since 2007!
JT
|