Hi Pete
Reading that page I do not see "should" but "suggestions". As Derek
points out UK-T1-RAL is only the WLCG designator though I have seen
other names used by the experiments.
Jeremy
On 14 Sep 2010, at 14:48, Peter Gronbech wrote:
> The web page here says we should use the WLCG name: UK-T1-RAL
>
> http://goc.grid.sinica.edu.tw/gocwiki/How_to_publish_my_site_information
>
> I know when I encouraged SouthGrid sites to set it we took advice
> from this or an earlier edition of it, but we chose
> RAL-LCG2, so I was think we got it wrong...
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Peter Gronbech Senior Systems Manager and Tel No. : 01865 273389
> SouthGrid Technical Co-ordinator Fax No. : 01865 273418
> Department of Particle Physics,
> University of Oxford,
> Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK E-mail : [log in to unmask]
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes [mailto:TB-
> [log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of J Coles
> Sent: 14 September 2010 14:42
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent
>
> Hi Richard
>
> We should adopt the official name which is given in the GOCDB and that
> is RAL-LCG2. Unless of course the Tier-1 intends to rename itself.
> Perhaps those using UK-T1-RAL (which is a more logical name) could
> explain where it came from initially?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeremy
>
>
>
> On 14 Sep 2010, at 14:24, Hellier, Richard (STFC,RAL,ESC) wrote:
>
>> Sam,
>>
>> As to origin, your guess is as good as mine! What I wanted to do was
>> stimulate some discussion and agree on one label every T2 can use.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sam Skipsey
>> Sent: 14 September 2010 14:06
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Getting Tier2 BDII configs consistent
>>
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Did you consider that this may be an artifact of other things (YAIM
>> configuration settings, for example) changing? It's possible that the
>> mapping is correlated with the last time the BDIIs were each
>> reconfigured. (RAL-LCG2 is certainly a valid, old, default.)
>>
>> Sam
>>
>> On 14 September 2010 13:53, Hellier, Richard (STFC,RAL,ESC)
>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> While upgrading the RAL top-level BDIIs last week, I spotted a few
>>> inconsistencies (including the "Latitude Change"
>>>
>> http://www.gridpp.rl.ac.uk/blog/2010/09/14/ral-tier1-takes-unexpected-excurs
>> ion-to-suffolk/).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The main thing I noticed was that "opinion is divided" between the
>>> UK
>> Tier2s
>>> on how to refer to the Tier1. According to:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://goc.grid.sinica.edu.tw/gocwiki/How_to_publish_my_site_information
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> (link given to me in a GGUS ticket when I queried this), the
>>> parameter
>>> WLCG_PARENT should be set to UK-T1-RAL whereas some sites are using
>>> RAL-LCG2.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Here's the state of play:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> EFDA-JET, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-LT2-Brunel, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-LT2-IC-HEP, UK-T1-RAL
>>>
>>> UKI-LT2-QMUL, UK-T1-RAL
>>>
>>> UKI-LT2-RHUL, UK-T1-RAL
>>>
>>> UKI-LT2-UCL-HEP, UK-T1-RAL
>>>
>>> UKI-NORTHGRID-LANCS-HEP, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-NORTHGRID-LIV-HEP, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-NORTHGRID-MAN-HEP, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-NORTHGRID-SHEF-HEP, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-SCOTGRID-DURHAM, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-SCOTGRID-ECDF, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-SCOTGRID-GLASGOW, UK-T1-RAL
>>>
>>> UKI-SOUTHGRID-BHAM-HEP, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-SOUTHGRID-BRIS-HEP, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-SOUTHGRID-CAM-HEP, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-SOUTHGRID-OX-HEP, RAL-LCG2
>>>
>>> UKI-SOUTHGRID-RALPP, UK-T1-RAL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> AFAIK, nothing is broken by the variation but might as well be
>>> tidied up
>>> next time the BDII config is being updated.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Richard.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> PS: The same is true of how Tier1 sites refer to CERN but that's
>>> another
>>> story ...
|