More Evidence That Current Pediatric Vitamin D Recommendation Is Often Inadequate

processing....

 

June 22, 2010 (San Diego, California) - The current American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendation that all children receive 400 IU of vitamin D each day might not be adequate for all pediatric patients, researchers reported here at the ENDO 2010: The Endocrine Society 92nd Annual Meeting.

Investigators at the East Tennessee Children's Hospital in Knoxville reviewed 25-hydoxy vitamin D (25-[OH]D) levels and recommended doses of vitamin D for pediatric patients who had their vitamin D levels checked repeatedly over a recent 12-month period.

The study found that 400 IU of vitamin D daily might not be adequate for all pediatric patients, especially those known to have insufficient or deficient vitamin D levels.

In 2008, the AAP revised its daily vitamin D recommendation from 200 to 400 IU daily for children of all ages, from newborns to teenagers. Low vitamin D levels have been linked to bone disease and an increased risk for cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and autoimmune disorders.

"While more specific and controlled studies should be conducted, our research suggests that a universal recommendation for vitamin D supplementation may be inadequate for the entire pediatric population," Carmen D. Tapiador, MD, pediatric endocrinologist at the East Tennessee Children's Hospital, told Medscape Endocrinology.

She noted that although all children in the study were diabetic, the results might apply to the general pediatric population. "Studies have shown that even in Florida, where there is a lot of sun exposure, there is still a high percentage of kids with low vitamin D," she said. "So I think we can safely extrapolate our findings to the general pediatric population and not just the pediatric diabetic population."

Patients in the study were categorized by sex into 3 age groups: 0 to 5 years, 6 to 10 years, and 11 years and older.

The study was divided into 4 seasons: winter (January 1 to March 20), spring (March 21 to June 20), summer (June 21 to September 21), and fall (September 22 to December 22).

At the initial evaluation, baseline 25-(OH)D levels, an accepted measure of vitamin D status, were measured. Children were then classified as deficient (<20 ng/mL), insufficient (20 to 29 ng/mL), or sufficient (>30 ng/mL). The 3 groups were prescribed 2000 IU, 1000 IU, and 400 IU of vitamin D, respectively.

A review of patient charts revealed that vitamin D levels of 23 children (18%) were sufficient, of 74 children (59%) were insufficient, and of 28 children (23%) were deficient.

Treatment with 400 IU for those in the sufficient group prevented a marked decline in final 25-(OH)D levels. However, it did not "substantially increase" the vitamin D levels of these patients.

For those in the insufficient and deficient categories, 1000 IU and 2000 IU improved vitamin D levels. "Thus, recommendations above 400 IU appeared to be necessary for all groups," Dr. Tapiador said.

Of African American/biracial patients, 91% had insufficient or deficient 25-(OH)D levels, and the increase in their levels was only 54% of those of their white counterparts.

The study also found that vitamin D levels generally increased during spring and summer and declined in the fall. "This was expected and is known to be due to the increased ultraviolet exposure during the spring and summer months," Dr. Tapiador said.

Based on the study, she recommends that physicians consider increasing dosage recommendations for individual patients on the basis of age, race, season, and baseline vitamin D level, and that all patients receive at least 1000 IU during the winter months.

In addition, Dr. Tapiador recommends that 3 groups receive at least 1000 IU of vitamin D daily year-round: all children younger than 5 years of age, females 10 years of age and older, and all patients with darker skin pigmentation.

"The study adds to the growing body of evidence demonstrating that more people are vitamin D-deficient than we had originally thought," James L. Rosenzweig, MD, endocrinologist and associate professor of medicine at Boston University School of Medicine in Massachusetts, told Medscape Endocrinology.

He cited research showing that vitamin D deficiency is more pronounced in the northern United States because of the lack of sun exposure. "People living in northern states have to compensate with adequate vitamin D intake or increased sun exposure," he said.

Dr. Tapiador emphasized that more research is needed to confirm his study's findings.

Dr. Tapiador and Dr. Rosenzweig have disclosed no relevant financial relationships. 

ENDO 2010: The Endocrine Society 92nd Annual Meeting. Abstract P1-170. Presented June 19, 2010.

 

 

Regards,

 

Steve

 

Steve Coward

Operational Manager, Automation

Clinical Biochemistry

Belfast Trust

028 9063 3007

 

This message contains information from Belfast Health and Social Care Trust which may be privileged and confidential. If you believe you are not the intended recipient any disclosure, distribution or use of the contents is prohibited. If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately. This email has been swept for the presence of computer viruses

 

From: Clinical biochemistry discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Hallworth Mike (RLZ)
Sent: 29 June 2010 15:03
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Sunshine vitamin CAP article

 

And it's not too late to book for this year's AACC meeting in Anaheim - 25-29 July. 

Symposium on the role of Vitamin D (featuring Reinhold Vieth, Sandra Rainbow and Adrian Martineau), workshop on methods for vitamin D - and the chance to boost your own levels while you're there!!

 

www.aacc.org

 

Mike Hallworth

Chair, Organizing Committee, AACC Anaheim 2010

 

 

 

________________________________

From: Clinical biochemistry discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of O'Connor John (Royal Devon and Exeter Foundation Trust)
Sent: 29 June 2010 14:54
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Sunshine vitamin CAP article

 

 

Also read Michael Horlick's opinion in May Clin Chem http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/content/full/56/5/729

 

 

Where he writes

 

 

"With the recognition of widespread vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency in children and adults, there is no need to measure everybody's blood 25(OH)D. It would be much more cost-effective to implement a vitamin D supplementation program for all children and adults until there is higher fortification of vitamin D in more foods."

 

BW John

 

________________________________

From: Clinical biochemistry discussion list [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Mohammad Al-Jubouri
Sent: 29 June 2010 14:48
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Sunshine vitamin CAP article

 

Also read Michael Holick NEJM article, it is fascinating:

 

http://www.uvadvantage.org/portals/0/pdf/NEJournalofMedicine.pdf


 

Mohammad

 

________________________________

From: David James <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tue, 29 June, 2010 14:22:22
Subject: Re: Sunshine vitamin CAP article

For those interested

http://www.cap.org/apps/cap.portal?_nfpb=true&cntvwrPtlt_actionOverride=%2Fportlets%2FcontentViewer%2Fshow&_windowLabel=cntvwrPtlt&cntvwrPtlt%7BactionForm.contentReference%7D=cap_today%2F0610%2F0610c_boningup.html&_state=maximized&_pageLabel=cntvwr

link takes you to article in latest Newsletter from College of American Pathologists

dj

Dr David James
Consultant Chemical Pathologist and Clinical Director
Department of Pathology
Taunton & Somerset NHS Trust
Taunton
TA1 5DA

Tel: 01823 34 22 72
Cell: 077 6688 0838
Fax: 01823 27 10 23

>>> Mohammad Al-Jubouri <[log in to unmask]> 29/06/2010 12:06 >>>
Clinicians are diagnosing vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency more than ever before, thanks to the easy availability of a blood test. We, like most of you, have seen soaring demand for serum vitamin D measurement for all sorts of things ranging from musculoskeletal, psychiatric, GIT, gynaecological ..etc complaints. From the hundreds of samples that we have vitamin D measured on them, it is uncommon to see vitamin D levels above 20 ug/L. The literature suggests that more than 60% of UK population are vitamin D deficient or insufficient. This is one vitamin deficiency of public health dimension, so should we really continue measuring vitamin D levels, or just mass supplement the whole population with 800-1000 IU daily? Which is more cost effective and clinically safe to pursue?

Your opinion is as ever most welcome.

Best regards


Mohammad




Dr. M A Al-Jubouri, MB ChB, MSc, FRCP Edin, FRCPath
Consultant Chemical Pathologist 




------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk <http://www.acb.org.uk/>  
Green Laboratories Work
http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk <http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk/>  
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html 
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

This message may contain confidential and privileged information.

If you are not the intended recipient please accept our apologies.

Please do not disclose copy or distribute information in this e-mail or take any action in reliance on its contents: to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

Please inform us that this message has gone astray before deleting it.

Thank you for your co-operation.

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk <http://www.acb.org.uk/> 
Green Laboratories Work
http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk <http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk/> 
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

 

------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk Green Laboratories Work http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk List Archives http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html <http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html>  List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/ ------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk Green Laboratories Work http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk List Archives http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html <http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html>  List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/

------ACB discussion List Information-------- This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry. Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content. ACB Web Site http://www.acb.org.uk Green Laboratories Work http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk List Archives http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html <http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html>  List Instructions (How to leave etc.) http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/ 


________________________________

This message contains information from Belfast Health And Social Care Trust which may be privileged and confidential.
If you believe you are not the intended recipient any disclosure, distribution or use of the contents is prohibited.
If you have received this message in error please notify the sender immediately.

This email has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses.

------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
Green Laboratories Work
http://www.laboratorymedicine.nhs.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/