Humblest apologies,
English being my fourth language and the one never got any training,
there is a fair possibility that many of my expressions tend to be
inarticulate.
The word "world" was aimed as a shorthand for "something in the
world, and only a tiny bit at a time".
Or was it a Freudian slip, a shade from a revolutionary past?
best regards,
--Kari
At 21:29 +1000 27.4.2010, David Sless wrote:
>Kari,
>
>indeed! Why stop at changing the world? Why not the universe?
>
>It's about time the laws of nature were overhauled. The first
>attempt, by general consensus, has been a mess. Surely designers
>could do a better job?
>
>In the meantime, I have a busy couple of days, but will return to
>Terry's 'new field of design' with some fresh questions, after a
>brief pause.
>
>David
>--
>
|