medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
Communion in one kind was certainly in place by the time of the
Hussite rebellion, because Communion in both kinds was one of their
demands, and the Chalice became the symbol of the Utraquists. How
much earlier than that it goes I don't truly know.
Andrew E. Larsen
On Apr 8, 2010, at 9:32 AM, John Briggs wrote:
> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and
> culture
>
> "Eventually" was probably around the same date already mentioned
> (Lateran IV). Trent just re-stated the theory of communion in both
> kinds - actual practice for the laity would probably only have been
> after Vatican II.
>
> John Briggs
>
>
> On 08/04/2010 15:14, Cormack, Margaret Jean wrote:
>> And my question is, when was that 'eventually'? I will be
>> mentioning the Council of Trent in class tomorrow,
>> when, if I recall correctly (have to go back over notes!)
>> communion
>> in both kinds was reinstated. And one student
>> is SURE to ask when receiving bread alone had happened!
>> Meg
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> From: medieval-religion - Scholarly discussions of medieval
>> religious culture [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
>> Behalf Of
>> Andrew Larsen
>> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:35 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [M-R] new priest in 1219
>>
>>
>> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion
>> and culture Well, if the letters of St Paul are to be believed, this
>> ritual emerged within the first generation of Christians and was the
>> major activity in worship. So the congregation has always
>> participated
>> in the ritual, although eventually it became standard practice
>> with the
>> Western Church for the laity to receive only the bread.
>>
>> Andrew E. Larsen
>>
>> On Apr 8, 2010, at 7:38 AM, Mariano Paniello wrote:
>>
>>
>> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval
>> religion and culture Sorry for the hasty and clumsy writing. I
>> meant of
>> course "when did the Roman Catholic church first allow..."
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 08:32:40 -0400
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [M-R] new priest in 1219
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>> medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval
>> religion and culture On this note, please allow an ignorant question:
>> when did Roman Catholic first allow congregants to receive the
>> eucharist?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> MP
>>
>> > Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:45:43 -0400
>> > From: [log in to unmask]
>> > Subject: Re: [M-R] new priest in 1219
>> > To: [log in to unmask]
>> >
>> > medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval
>> religion and culture
>> >
>> > In the Orthodox church, everything the priest does in
>> connection with
>> > the eucharist is hidden behind the iconostasis,
>> invisible to the
>> > congretation.
>> > Meg
>
> **********************************************************************
> To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
> to: [log in to unmask]
> To send a message to the list, address it to:
> [log in to unmask]
> To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
> to: [log in to unmask]
> In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
> [log in to unmask]
> For further information, visit our web site:
> http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|