JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  July 2009

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM July 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Australian ERA Metrics

From:

John Bryson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

John Bryson <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 30 Jul 2009 12:00:45 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (1 lines)



And some academics in the UK throught the RAE was problamatic. We can just be content that the UK has yet to introduce this method of assessment to Geography. 



It is important to appreciate that this method has been common in Business Schools for some years. I have sat on selection panels for some posts in Business Schools and have been amazed by the reliance placed on the list of approved weighted journals. The contribution and the ideas no longer matter, but the place of publication become all important. In some Business Schools they even reward academics who publish in the top ten journals with a one off salary supplement of C£1000 per paper. 



John 





-----Original Message-----

From: A forum for critical and radical geographers [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jon Swords

Sent: 30 July 2009 10:15

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Australian ERA Metrics



What a fascinating list and set of descriptors. I wonder how the editors of the Journal of Economic Geography must feel about their journal's absence.



Good news for institutions with members on discipline panels, however. They won't be losing their academics for nearly as much time during the assessment as there will be no need to read anyone's submissions; a quick tally of entries against the master list and job done. In fact, why not just get a computer to do all the work?



Jon



-----Original Message-----

From: A forum for critical and radical geographers [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of David Bissell

Sent: 30 July 2009 09:16

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Australian ERA Metrics



Whilst full implementation of the Australian ERA is from 2010, only the Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences (PCE) and Humanities and Creative Arts (HCA) lists have been finalised at present. 



The Environment and Planning journals currently feature in the finalised HCA list under "Urban and Regional Planning" as follows:



A*	Environment and Planning A

A	Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design	

B	Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy

B	Environment and Planning D: Society and Space

(see http://www.arc.gov.au/xls/hca_journals_unique.xls)



I should also mention, the list in my original message is taken from the *Draft* list - as many of the Human Geography journals are not listed under the HCA list (see here http://lamp.infosys.deakin.edu.au/era/) 



The *draft* list puts each of the Environment and Planning journals as A*. When the final Social Science lists are released, their status will hopefully be reflected here. But I'm not sure whether the same journal can be represented in multiple lists AND given a different ranking .... Would be great if someone in the know could advise (I'm new to Australian academic and trying to get my head around it...)



The generic rankings are described as follows. Apparently Antipode is an "important outlet for the work of PhD students and early career researchers."



A* (top 5%)

Typically an A* journal would be one of the best in its field or subfield in which to publish and would typically cover the entire field/subfield.  Virtually all papers they publish will be of a very high quality.  These are journals where most of the work is important (it will really shape the field) and where researchers boast about getting accepted.  Acceptance rates would typically be low and the editorial board would be dominated by field leaders, including many from top institutions.



A (next 15%)

The majority of papers in a Tier A journal will be of very high quality. Publishing in an A journal would enhance the author’s standing, showing they have real engagement with the global research community and that they have something to say about problems of some significance.  Typical signs of an A journal are lowish acceptance rates and an editorial board which includes a reasonable fraction of well known researchers from top institutions.



B (next 30%)

Tier B covers journals with a solid, though not outstanding, reputation.  Generally, in a Tier B journal, one would expect only a few papers of very high quality. They are often important outlets for the work of PhD students and early career researchers.  Typical examples would be regional journals with high acceptance rates, and editorial boards that have few leading researchers from top international institutions.



C (next 50%)

Tier C includes quality, peer reviewed, journals that do not meet the criteria of the higher tiers.



(http://www.arc.gov.au/era/tiers_ranking.htm) 

Full details of how indicators are arrived at: http://www.arc.gov.au/era/indicators.htm







-----Original Message-----

From: A forum for critical and radical geographers [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Peter Thomas

Sent: 30 July 2009 17:21

To: [log in to unmask]

Subject: Re: Australian ERA Metrics



If you look online at the list for Cultural studies you can see that

'Fibreculture', which I believe is an online open access journal, and has

been ranked A*. It was ranked as a C in the draft. Apparently upgraded

after some lobbying for it.



'Borderlands' another online open access journal was ranked a B.



So I think online open access journals can have a place, if somebody is

shouting loud enough for them in the process.



There does seem to be some bizarre rankings given to some of these

journals. Unless we go down the metrics line this process will always be

subjective to a certain degree. I wonder how 'rigourous' this ranking

process was? Anybody in the know? Australian specific journals seem to be

coming out consistantly high throughout this whole process. What does this

mean for the reach of Australian academia in the long term?



A shame that Environment and Planning D has been placed in two other

categories but not human geography.



Peter











On Thu, July 30, 2009 7:33 am, Lawrence Berg wrote:

> David,

> Thanks for posting this to the CGF.  It is interesting to see this list,

> as

> much as for what it leaves out as for what it includes (and how it ranks

> them in relation to each other).  As an editor of ACME, an open-access

> journal with an impact factor ranking us about 22nd, or in the middle of

> the

> Geography pack (albeit an unofficial one, since we do not submit ourselves

> to ISI rankings), it¹s interesting to see that no open access journals are

> included in this list.  If the list stays the same as it is now, it seems

> that Australia will be moving in the opposite policy direction to many

> other

> states like Canada and the USA.  In these places, scholars are being

> required by national granting councils to publish at least some of their

> findings in open-access venues.  Even more interestingly, almost every

> journal in the Australian list is published by commercial, for-profit,

> publishing houses.  As I note in a critical essay on Geographical

> Publishing

> that¹s coming out in the International Encyclopedia of Human Geography

> (ironically, published by a giant corporate publisher), corporate

> publishers

> have been making significant profit increases year-on-year because of

> their

> captive market and because of their extensive use of free academic labour

> (further subsidized by state-funded universities and state-funded research

> grants).   The list of journals that you have provided us with suggests to

> me that in Australia the commercial publishers will gain a stranglehold on

> publishing because their journals are required publication venues under

> the

> ERA.  Hopefully, there will be some push-back from Australian academics.

> Best wishes,

> Lawrence

> --

> Lawrence D. Berg, D.Phil.

> Co-Director, The Centre for Social, Spatial & Economic Justice

> Graduate Coordinator, Human Geography

>

> Community, Culture and Global Studies

> University of British Columbia

> 3333 University Way

> Kelowna, BC, Canada, V1V 1V7

> Voice: +1 250.807.9392, Fax: +1 250.807.8001

> Email: [log in to unmask]

> WEB: http://www.chrdi.org/ldb/index.html

>

> Editor: ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies

> http://www.acme-journal.org

>

> Co-Leader: BC Disabilities Health Research Network

> http://www.dhrn.ca

>

>

> On 29/07/09 9:01 PM, "David Bissell" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>

>> In the context of continuing debates in the UK on the RAE/REF (and

>> following

>> from the excellent article by Richards et. al recently published in

>> Area),

>> list members might be interested in the metrics system currently under

>> review

>> in the Australian context. The ŒExcellence in Research for Australia¹

>> (ERA)

>> initiative will use a combination of metrics and Œexpert review¹. One of

>> these

>> indicators is a discipline-specific tiered journal ranking system.

>> Whilst the

>> ŒHuman Geography¹ list is yet to be finalised, the provisional list is

>> below

>> with journals ranked from C to A*.

>>

>> Clearly some significant implications for research and dissemination

>> practiceŠ

>>

>> A* Annals of the Association of American Geographers 0004-5608

>> A* Body and Society

>> A* Economic Geography 0013-0095

>> A* Environment and Planning A 0308-518X

>> A* Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design 0265-8135

>> A* Environment and Planning C

>> A* Environment and Planning D-Society & Space 0263-7758

>> A* International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 0309-1317

>> A* Journal of Rural Studies 0743-0167

>> A* Progress in Human Geography 0309-1325

>> A* Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 0020-2754

>> A Applied Geography 0143-6228

>> A Area 0004-0894

>> A Australian Geographer 0004-9182

>> A Canadian Geographer-Geographe Canadien 0008-3658

>> A Cities 0264-2751

>> A Community Development Journal 0010-3802

>> A Environment and Behavior 0013-9165

>> A European Urban and Regional Studies 0969-7764

>> A Geoforum 0016-7185

>> A Geographical Research 1745-5863

>> A Journal of Urban Affairs 0735-2166

>> A Political Geography 0962-6298

>> A Professional Geographer 0033-0124

>> A Regional Studies 0034-3404#

>> A Theory Culture & Society 0263-2764

>> A Urban Affairs Review 1078-0874

>> A Urban Studies 0042-0980

>> B Antipode 0066-4812

>> B Australasian Journal of Regional Studies

>> B Cultural Geographies 1474-4740

>> B Gender Place and Culture 0966-369X

>> B Geografiska Annaler Series B-Human Geography 0435-3684

>> B Geographical Analysis 0016-7363

>> B Geographical Journal 0016-7398

>> B Geography 0016-7487

>> B Geojournal

>> B New Zealand Geographer 0028-8144

>> B Papers in Regional Science 1056-8190

>> B Social & Cultural Geography 1464-9365

>> C Boletin de la Asociacion de Geografos Espanoles 0212-9426

>> C Children and Society 0951-0605

>> C Children Youth and Environments

>> C Children's Geographies

>> C Education and Urban Society 0013-1245

>> C Eurasian Geography and Economics 1538-7216

>> C EURE-Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Urbano Regionales 0250-7161

>> C Geographical Review 0016-7428

>> C Geographische Zeitschrift 0016-7479

>> C Habitat International 0197-3975

>> C Journal of Geography 0022-1341

>> C Journal of Urban Analysis 0091-1909

>> C Journal of Urban Technology 1063-0732

>> C Mitteilungen der Osterreichischen Geographischen Gesellschaft

>> C Mobilities 1745-0101

>> C Post-Soviet Geography and Economics 1088-9388

>> C Scottish Geographical Journal 0036-9225

>> C Scripta Nova-Revista Electronica de Geografia y Ciencias Sociales

>> C South Australian Geographical Journal 1030-0481

>> C Urban Geography 0272-3638

>> C Urban Interest 0192-4974

>> C Urban League Review 0147-1740

>> C Urban Life 0098-3039

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> ___________________________________

>> Dr. David Bissell

>> School of Social Sciences | Research School of Social Sciences

>> The Australian National University

>> ACT 0200, Australia

>>

>> Tel +61 2 6125 4209

>> Email [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>

>> Web www.davidbissell.com <http://www.davidbissell.com>

>>

>>

>>

>

>

>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager