Hi Terry,
I was thinking more about direct, intended research outcomes that
constitute a contribution to the field, rather than the indirect
consequences.
But just to clarify, you're saying a "no" then. (?)
cheers
Robbie
Terence Love wrote:
> Hi Robbie,
>
> I find research often has resulted the research products of a stiff back and
> an empty wallet. Should these also be included as publications?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Terry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: PhD-Design - This list is for discussion of PhD studies and related
> research in Design [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Robbie
> Napper
> Sent: Friday, 1 May 2009 7:31 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Dissemination (from ecology and journals threads)
>
> Chris, Ken and list,
>
> Thanks for the posts on dissemination, it helps to clear up some of the
> mystique in this area that I have encountered so far in my studies. The tips
> on getting work online and available are very helpful for this new
> researcher.
>
> Ken's comment:
>
> "There are many other ways to publish -- books and monographs, book
> chapters, refereed web sites, papers at leading conferences..."
>
>
> ... raises a question I have been thinking about for a while. I was
> discussing only yesterday with my supervisors the nature of design research;
> where the written word is a large part of our communication, but not the
> only part. In many situations, mine included, the research has resulted in
> manufactured products. Should we design researchers consider these artefacts
> as a publication? If so, who will count them?
>
> best regards,
>
> Robbie Napper
> Industrial Design
> Monash University
> p) +61 3 990 31059
> f) +61 3 990 31440
>
|