I understand. Average contiental geotherm may be a good alternative.
Cheers
patrice
On 14/05/09 1:16 PM, "Reia M. Chmielowski" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Thank you to the list--two useful replies within a half an hour of
> posting the question! (Though, of course, if others have replies
> coming through later, they will be appreciated as well.) For the
> record I opted to use the term "normal geotherm" because that was the
> term labeled on the curve on the1979 diagram, not because I thought
> it was the best word choice for what I'm looking for...
>
> --Reia
>
> Reia M. Chmielowski
> PhD Candidate
> Department of Earth Sciences/CODES
> University of Tasmania, Australia
> (03) 6239 6666
> 0408 238 590
> http://utas.academia.edu/ReiaChmielowski
Dr P. F. Rey
Earthbyte Research Group / www.earthbyte.org
Structural Geology, Tectonics, Geodynamics
The School of Geosciences
The University of Sydney
Sydney
NSW 2006
Tel: +61 2 9351 2067
Fx: +61 2 9351 0184
URL: http://www.geosci.usyd.edu.au/users/prey
|