medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
Another detailed argument, by a veteran opponent of the ascription of the _Epistolae duorum amantium_ to Heloise and Abelard, is Peter von Moos, "Die _Epistolae duorum amantium_ und die säkulare Religion der Liebe: Methodenkritische Vorüberlegungen zu einem einmaligen Werk mittellateinsicher Briefliteratur," _Studi Medievali_, serie 3a, 44 (2003), 1-115.
Best,
John Dillon
On Tuesday, January 13, 2009, at 12:15 pm, Paul Chandler wrote:
> For a detailed argument on stylistic grounds against the authenticity
> of the
> letters published by Mews, see Jan M. Ziolkowski, "Heloise, Abelard,
> and the
> *Epistolae duorum amantium*: Lost and Not Yet Found", *Journal of Medieval
> Latin* 14 (2004): 171-202.
>
>
>
> 2009/1/13 Daniel K. Gullo <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
> >
> > I would also add to the discussion the new/lost letters of Heloise.
> >
> > Constant J. Mews. The Lost Love Letters of Heloise and Abelard: Perceptions
> > of Dialogue in Twelfth-Century France. With translations By Neville
> > Chiavaroli and Constant J. Mews. New York: St. Martin's, 1999.
> >
> > Best, Daniel
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|