Even more likely if the item in question was a graphic novel featuring Desperate Dan & co. :-)
-----Original Message-----
From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Alan Issler
Sent: 15 August 2008 15:17
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: fines:secrets and lies or shadow boxing?
If a charge for the late return of a book is levied on a flamboyant
individual might this be termed fine and dandy?
Alan Issler
Neighbourhood and Enterprise Manager
Brighton & Hove City Libraries
Jubilee Library
Jubilee Street,
Brighton BN1 1GE
tel:01273-296948
mob: 07795336492
fax:01273-296976
'e' mail: [log in to unmask]
website: www.citylibraries.info
Williams Alun H DAT/DGO
<AlunHughesWilliams@GWYN To: [log in to unmask]@SMTP@Exchange
EDD.GOV.UK> cc: (bcc: Alan Issler/CR/HTH/BHC)
Sent by: "lis-pub-libs: Subject: Re: fines:secrets and lies or shadow boxing?
UK Public Libraries"
<[log in to unmask]
C.UK>
15/08/2008 15:11
Please respond to
Williams Alun H DAT/DGO
<AlunHughesWilliams@GWYN
EDD.GOV.UK>
"We need libraries to be 'judged' by a set of standards NOT related to the
simple issue of books"
Couldn't agree more. It's high time we were freed from the tyranny of issue
(whether or not that includes renewal) statistics.
This reliance on stats has a mendacious effect on the public library
service. Because of the reliance on statistics, some librarians will feel
the need to buy books which are LIKELY to be borrowed on a large scale; at
the expense of quality. So, you end up with libraries where "classic
literature" (good, edifying, vocabulary-enhancing stuff) merits a
five-shelf
column to itself, surrounded by tons of pulp-fiction (which is expected to
fly off the shelves).
Does that mean, perhaps, that we as librarians are more concerned with
keeping ourselves busy than with offering the public a taste of something
loftier than the everyday run of things?
Just a thought...
Alun
-----Original Message-----
From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries [mailto:[log in to unmask]
]
On Behalf Of Frances Hendrix
Sent: 15 August 2008 14:04
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: fines:secrets and lies or shadow boxing?
But if one borrower has an item for a long period (and I don't see a
problem
with that if there isn't a waiting list), how is that indicative of
effective performance of stock?. You have of course satisfied one borrower
very much, but it is hardly an indication of the performance of the stock
is it?
Surely issue figures relate to one book to one borrower on one occasion,
not
multiple occasions if it is renewed by the same person.
I do think this all needs to be bottomed out, but I can see the risks if
everyone now decides to come clean on why charge fines, and why massage
issue figures. We need libraries to be 'judged' by a set of standards NOT
related to the simple issue of books. remember the Laser work done by PwC
on
Output measures, much more sophisticated and worth doing.
Now we are bandying figures and comments about without the help of hard
evidence (and I don't mean the now suspect issue figures).
f, well make a guess!
Frances Hendrix
Martin House Farm, Hilltop Lane, Whittle le Woods, Chorley, Lancs PR6 7QR,
UK
tel: 01257 274 833. fax: 01257 266 488
email: [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Day Robert" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 9:25 AM
Subject: Re: fines:secrets and lies or shadow boxing?
It's only misleading if the initial assumption is that issue figures do NOT
contain renewals and given that all authorities report performance data to
the same body subject to the same criteria I don't believe this to be the
case. Is any authority really claiming that renewals are new issues to a
different borrower?
I think you can make a good case that it shouldn't happen and that renewals
should count separately from issues or, in some other way, be able to
calculate issues to unique borrowers. On the other hand, regardless of
whether it be an issue or renewal it means that the item in question is in
use and thus when looking at the effective performance of a stock item both
need to be taken into account. Historically I imagine there was also a case
to be made that renewals occupied as much staff time as a new issue and
thus
needed to be recorded similarly - this is much less so now with the
facility
for customers to either use the web OPAC and/or use automatd telephone
renewal systems.
Finally, I have to ask since it's been puzzling me but just what is the
lower case 'f' all about?
Regards
Robert Day
Cambridgeshire Libraries, UK
-----Original Message-----
From: lis-pub-libs: UK Public Libraries
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of Frances Hendrix
Sent: 15 August 2008 08:58
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: fines:secrets and lies or shadow boxing?
Well if a renewal by the same person is counted as a new issue to a
different borrower, that is misleading. There has been an indication of
this
in the responses. off line there have been far more worrying trends
mentioned that inflate or massage the figures of use etc which have been
happening for many many years, and quite honestly astonishes and
disappoints
me. I know we live in a number crunching world (but these practices seemt
o
pre date that),where performance tick box data is the norm, but I just
thought libraries were different and better.
It would appear my 'thought out of the blue' was correct.
I look forward to reading your thoughts and comments in the Guardian.
f
Frances Hendrix
Martin House Farm, Hilltop Lane, Whittle le Woods, Chorley, Lancs PR6 7QR,
UK
tel: 01257 274 833. fax: 01257 266 488
email: [log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Loz Pycock" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:17 PM
Subject: Re: fines:secrets and lies or shadow boxing?
> Frances Hendrix wrote:
>> Just had a thought.
>> Have the statistics on lending been skewed for years? If every renewal
>> of a book (maybe even to avoid fines), has been counted by public
>> libraries as a new loan and a new borrower, hasn't it been a case of
>> misleading information?
>>
> Please could you explain why you think it's misleading?
>
> --
> - --
> Loz
>
> "Dora The Explorer tastes like brain damage."
> - http://www.shortpacked.com/d/20070803.html
> "I support gay marriage because I believe they have a right to be just
> as miserable as the rest of us." - Kinky Friedman
>
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you receive this
email by mistake please notify the sender and delete it immediately.
Opinions expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily
represent the opinion of Cambridgeshire County Council. All sent and
received email from Cambridgeshire County Council is automatically scanned
for the presence of computer viruses and security issues
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mae'r e-bost hwn ac unrhyw atodiad iddo yn gyfrinachol ac fe'i bwriedir ar
gyfer y sawl a enwir arno yn unig. Gall gynnwys gwybodaeth freintiedig. Os
yw wedi eich cyrraedd trwy gamgymeriad ni ellwch ei gopio, ei ddosbarthu
na'i ddangos i unrhyw un arall a dylech gysylltu a'r anfonwr ar unwaith.
Mae unrhyw gynnwys nad yw'n ymwneud a busnes swyddogol y corff sy'n anfon
yr e-bost yn bersonol i'r awdur.
-------------------------------------------------------------
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended for the named
recipient only. The content may contain privileged information. If it has
reached you by mistake, you should not copy, distribute or show the content
to anyone but should contact the sender at once.
Any content that is not pertinent to the official business of the
organisation is personal to the author.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Arbedwch bapur, ynni ac arian - Peidiwch argraffu'r neges yma oni bai ei
bod yn hollol angenrheidiol.
Save paper, energy and money - Do not print this message unless it is
absolutely necessary.
Notice to recipient:
The information contained in this electronic mail message is intended only for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed and may contain information which is privileged and confidential, the disclosure of which is prohibited by law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error please notify the sender immediately. Thank you in anticipation of your co-operation.
You can visit our website at http://www.brighton-hove.gov.uk
Please consider the environment, only print out this email if absolutely necessary.
The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. If you receive this email by mistake please notify the sender and delete it immediately. Opinions expressed are those of the individual and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Cambridgeshire County Council. All sent and received email from Cambridgeshire County Council is automatically scanned for the presence of computer viruses and security issues
|