Hi Thomas,
An initial test is easy - download FEEDS (same download site as the
rest of FSL) test dataset and run it (see the FEEDS evaluation link
on the main FSL website). This will test many of the FSL programs.
The FEEDS webpage also explains how to run the same tests by hand, to
give some of the GUIs a test.
Cheers.
On 27 Sep 2007, at 08:02, Thomas Sattler wrote:
> Hi again ...
>
>> You'll probably have a hard time compiling FSL for sarge. A number of
>> it's dependencies are pretty outdated. Escpecially VTK will be a
>> pain to
>> backport, partly because of the changes in the Python packaging
>> policy.
>
> I've been able to compile fsl-4.0.1 for sarge with only three small
> patches. But I'm 'only' the sysadmin here and do not know much about
> MRI. (So I could just look for compile errors.)
>
> I've asked some people to check whether fsl is working as expected
> but I do not have any feedback yet. Is there anything I can do to
> test fsl?
>
> As I wrote two different mails with different questions to this list
> so I'll better start a new thread, called 'a small patch to compile
> fsl-4.0.1' on debian sarge for the solution.
>
>> Any chance you can upgrade your nodes to etch?
>
> Not ATM.
>
> Thomas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
Stephen M. Smith, Professor of Biomedical Engineering
Associate Director, Oxford University FMRIB Centre
FMRIB, JR Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK
+44 (0) 1865 222726 (fax 222717)
[log in to unmask] http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/~steve
------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
|